Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Susanna Implant in Patients With Refractory Glaucoma.
1 other identifier
interventional
76
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Study clinical multicenter, phase III, open-label, prospective character to evaluate the efficacy and safety Susanna Implant in patients with refractory glaucoma.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started May 2011
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 4, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 14, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2011
CompletedMay 10, 2011
May 1, 2011
5 months
August 4, 2010
May 9, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Study clinical multicenter, phase III, open-label, prospective character to evaluate the efficacy and safety Susanna implant in patients with refractory glaucoma.
Evaluate the effectiveness of implant susanna in patients with refractory glaucoma.
180 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Study clinical multicenter, phase III, open-label, prospective character to evaluate the efficacy and safety Susanna implant in patients with refractory glaucoma. "
180 days
Study Arms (1)
Susanna Implant
NO INTERVENTIONPatients with refractory glaucoma neovascular type or that failed in trabeculectomy will undergo surgery to place implants Susana.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Neovascular glaucoma group:
- Patient with neovascular glaucoma whose intraocular pressures which must be above 21 in at least three measurements, at different times in at least two different days during one month, despite maximum tolerated medical therapy.
- Visual acuity better than hand movements in the study eye.
- Patients 18 years or more.
- Patients with fixed residence in the health district where the surgery will be performed.
- Patients who fit the term of consent.
- Group post-trabeculectomy failure:
- Patients diagnosed with primary open angle glaucoma, pseudoesfoliação, pigmented or primary angle closure who underwent surgery with trabeculectomy procedure after failure of at least two months of surgery. The pressure must be above 21 in at least three measurements, at different times in at least two different days during one month, despite maximum tolerated medical therapy.
- Patients diagnosed with primary open angle glaucoma, pseudoesfoliação, pigmented or primary angle closure who underwent surgery with trabeculectomy procedure after failure of at least two months for surgery and who can not afford the expenses of medical treatment. The pressure must be above 21 in at least three measurements, at different times in at least two different days during one month.
- Visual acuity better than hand movements in the study eye.
- Patients 18 years or more.
- Patients with fixed residence in the health district where the surgery will be performed.
- Patients who fit the term of consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Group post-trabeculectomy failure:
- Presence of staphyloma that does not allow the procedure.
- Presence of history of scleritis
- Presence of psychiatric disorder that has required hospitalization.
- Presence of retinal detachment surgery with placement of a buckle or track.
- Presence of corneal opacity that could prevent the adequate view of the anterior chamber.
- Presence of shallow anterior chamber that would prevent the placement of the implant.
- Presence of vitreous in aphakia or anterior chamber.
- Presence of psychiatric disorder that has required hospitalization.
- Neovascular glaucoma group:
- Presence of staphyloma that does not allow the procedure.
- Presence of history of scleritis.
- Presence of corneal opacity that could prevent the adequate view of the anterior chamber.
- Presence of shallow anterior chamber that would prevent the placement of the implant.
- Presence of vitreous in aphakia or anterior chamber.
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05651-901, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Remo Susanna, Investigator
Hospital das Clínicas de São Paulo
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Renato Lisboa, Investigator
UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cláudia Galvão, Investigator
Hospital Universitário Prof. Edgar Santos - BA
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Flávia Villas, Investigator
- Instituto brasileiro de Oftalmologia e prevenção da cegueira- BA
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Fábio Kanadani, Investigator
Hospital Universitário São José - Belo Horizonte
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Augusto Paranhos, Investigator
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 4, 2010
First Posted
March 14, 2011
Study Start
May 1, 2011
Primary Completion
October 1, 2011
Study Completion
October 1, 2011
Last Updated
May 10, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-05