A Study That Evaluates the Decrease in Irritation When Using Additional Acne Treatment Products
An Investigator-Blind, Phase 4 Study Assessing Mitigation of Facial Irritation When Comparing the Use of Two Acne Treatment Products (Retin-A Micro® 0.1 % Pump and Aczone®) With One Treatment Product (Retin-A Micro® 0.1 % Pump) Using a Split-Face Model
1 other identifier
interventional
26
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is to see if there's any difference in the amount of facial irritation when two acne products are used together on one side of the face, compared to one acne treatment product used alone on the other side of the face. All people participating in this trial will be required to return to the same study center every weekday for two weeks for the investigator to check for irritation on the face and to have the products applied - on weekends they will have to put them on at home. If one side of the face is more irritated than the other side, a picture will be taken as well.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Dec 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 10, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 14, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 19, 2012
CompletedFebruary 15, 2012
February 1, 2012
Same day
March 10, 2011
October 14, 2011
February 14, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Expert Grader Assessment - Erythema
Ordinal erythema scores (on a scale of 0=none to 8=severe scaling and fissuring) were collected on weekdays for two weeks and the total daily score (for all subjects) was treated as a single interval measurement for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 2000 (highest possible score of 8, times 10 days, times 25 subjects).
Baseline to 2 Weeks
Expert Grader Assessment - Dryness
Ordinal dryness scores (on a scale of 0=none to 8=deep) were collected on weekdays for two weeks and the total daily score (for all subjects) was treated as a single interval measurement for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 2000 (highest possible score of 8, times 10 days, times 25 subjects).
Baseline to 2 Weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Subject Assessment - Burning/Stinging
Baseline to 2 Weeks
Subject Assessment - Itching
Baseline to 2 Weeks
Subject Assessment - Tightness
Baseline to 2 Weeks
Facial Tolerance
Baseline to 2 Weeks
Study Arms (2)
Dapsone plus Tretinoin Gel
EXPERIMENTALDapsone gel, followed by tretinoin gel one hour later, applied once daily to the assigned side of the face for 2 weeks - all subjects participate in both arms in a split-face model
Tretinoin Gel Alone
ACTIVE COMPARATORTretinoin gel applied once daily to the assigned side of the face for 2 weeks - all subjects participate in both arms in a split-face model
Interventions
Dapsone gel, followed by tretinoin gel one hour later, applied once daily to the assigned side of the face for 2 weeks
Tretinoin gel applied once daily to the assigned side of the face for 2 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Fitzpatrick Skin Type I, II or III with healthy skin as judged by the investigator
- Bilateral skin is clear of any confounding irritation, rashes, acne, rosacea, etc., prior to study start
- Subjects are willing to avoid applying emollients or cosmetics to the face 24 hours before they start, and during the study
- If subject is of childbearing potential, subject has been using a protocol-approved method of birth control for a certain amount of time, and is willing to continue using it throughout the study
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects who are pregnant or nursing, or intend to be during the study
- Subjects with any condition or medical history, or using any drug or medication, that might negatively affect the subject's safety or the validity of study results, either as listed in the protocol or in the opinion of the investigator
- Subjects who have facial hair that may obstruct or hinder the evaluation of any reactions
- Subjects who use any known photosensitizing agents
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Skin Study Center
Broomall, Pennsylvania, 19008, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- David Lineberry, Associate Director, Clinical Operations
- Organization
- Valeant Pharmaceuticals International Inc
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
David Lineberry
Bausch Health Americas, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 10, 2011
First Posted
March 14, 2011
Study Start
December 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2010
Study Completion
January 1, 2011
Last Updated
February 15, 2012
Results First Posted
January 19, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-02