Forensic Assertive Community Treatment: An Emerging Model of Service Delivery
FACT
1 other identifier
interventional
53
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The FACT model (ACT + legal leverage in the form of judicial monitoring) will be compared to enhanced outpatient treatment (close outpatient follow-up without judicial monitoring). Seventy adults with psychotic disorders in Monroe County who are convicted of a misdemeanor will be randomly assigned to each treatment group and followed for 12 months. Primary outcomes will include criminal justice and mental health service utilization rates, treatment adherence, psychiatric symptoms, substance abuse, homelessness, perceived coercion, and consumer satisfaction. Service utilization outcomes will be tracked using established mental health and criminal justice databases. Hypotheses are:
- 1.FACT (ACT plus judicial monitoring) will have a greater effect than enhanced TAU in promoting treatment adherence among high-risk adults with psychotic disorders.
- 2.FACT (ACT plus judicial monitoring) will have a greater effect than enhanced TAU in preventing arrest, incarceration, emergency department and inpatient hospital use among high-risk adults with psychotic disorders.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started May 2008
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 8, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 11, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2014
CompletedFebruary 28, 2017
February 1, 2017
6 years
March 8, 2011
February 24, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Jail Recidivism
The study will measure number of arrests, number of incarcerations, and total number of jail and/or prison days in the time frame described above.
For the one year subjects are in the study.
Mental Health Service Utilization
The study will measure number of hospitalizations, number of hospital days, number of emergency room visits, number of outpatient mental health visits as primary outcome measures, and treatment appointment adherence.
For the one year subjects are in the study.
Study Arms (2)
Forensic Assertive Community Treatment (FACT)
EXPERIMENTALIndividuals in this arm will receive the services of an Assertive Community Treatment team and close supervision of a judge trained in the FACT model.
Enhanced Treatment as Usual
ACTIVE COMPARATORIndividuals in this arm of the study will receive an expedited appointment at a clinic specializing in the treatment of psychotic disorders. These individuals will receive the services of a therapist, psychiatrist, and case manager.
Interventions
Individuals in this arm will receive the services of an Assertive Community Treatment team and close supervision of a judge trained in the FACT model.
Individuals in this arm of the study will receive an expedited appointment at a clinic specializing in the treatment of psychotic disorders. These individuals will receive the services of a therapist, psychiatrist, and case manager.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Individuals diagnosed with any psychotic disorder such as Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Disorder with Psychotic Features, Depressive Disorder with Psychotic Features, and Psychotic Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified.
- Individuals currently facing misdemeanor or violation charges who have not yet been sentenced.
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals do not have or cannot be diagnosed with a psychotic disorder.
- Individuals currently facing felony charges
- Individuals currently involved in any type of legal leverage including probation, parole, drug or mental health court supervision, Assisted Outpatient Treatment, or Criminal Procedure Law status.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Monroe County Jail
Rochester, New York, 14614, United States
Related Publications (3)
Lamberti JS, Deem A, Weisman RL, LaDuke C. The role of probation in forensic assertive community treatment. Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Apr;62(4):418-21. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.4.pss6204_0418.
PMID: 21459994BACKGROUNDLamberti, J., & Weisman, R. (2010). Forensic assertive community treatment: Origins, current practice, and future directions. In H. Dlugacz (Ed.), Reentry Planning for Offenders With Mental Disorders (1 ed., Vol. 1, pp. 145-169). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.
BACKGROUNDLamberti, JS. (2011). Legal Leverage in the Treatment of Adults With Severe Mental Illness, in Workplace Violence in Mental Health and General Health Care Settings. Pages 225 - 236. M. Privitera, editor. Jones and Bartlett, Pages 225-236.
RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
J Steven Lamberti, MD
University of Rochester
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, Department of Psychiatry
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 8, 2011
First Posted
March 11, 2011
Study Start
May 1, 2008
Primary Completion
May 1, 2014
Study Completion
May 1, 2014
Last Updated
February 28, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02