Is Non-cycloplegic Photorefraction Applicable for Screening Refractive Risk Factors of Amblyopia?
1 other identifier
interventional
185
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Purpose: : This study was performed to compare the accuracy of non-cycloplegic photorefraction with cycloplegic refraction in detection of refractive amblyopia risk factors and determine some corresponding beneficial cut points. Method: In this diagnostic accuracy study, right eyes of 185 children (1 to 14 years) underwent first non-cycloplegic photorefraction (with PlusOptix SO4 photoscreener) and then cycloplegic refraction from October 2009 to August 2010. Based on the cycloplegic refraction results, hyperopia (≥+3.5D), myopia (≥-3D), astigmatism (≥1.5D), and anisometropia (≥1.5D) were set as criteria based on AAPOS guidelines. The difference in detection of refractive amblyopia risk factors between the two methods was the main outcome measure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Oct 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 3, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 4, 2011
CompletedMarch 8, 2011
October 1, 2009
March 3, 2011
March 7, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
refraction
cycloplegic auto refraction \& Non-cycloplegic photorefraction
10 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
hyperopia (≥+3.5D), myopia (≥-3D), astigmatism (≥1.5D), and anisometropia (≥1.5D) were set as criteria based on AAPOS guidelines.
10 months
Study Arms (1)
one arm
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \> 1 year old /with consent
You may not qualify if:
- mental retardation
- impaired fixation
- strabismus
- ptosis and any other organic ophthalmic disorder interfering with refraction
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Labbafinejad medical center
Tehran, Iran
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2011
First Posted
March 4, 2011
Study Start
October 1, 2009
Study Completion
August 1, 2010
Last Updated
March 8, 2011
Record last verified: 2009-10