Hypothermia and Circulatory Arrest During Surgery on the Ascending Aorta: A Comparison Between Two Cooling Methods
1 other identifier
observational
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
PURPOSE: To compare crash cooling versus gradient cooling methods for patients undergoing planned surgery on the ascending aorta in deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. To investigate the impact of hypothermia and circulatory arrest on the coagulation, stress-response, and cerebral outcome. BACKGROUND: Cooling to 18 °C using extracorporeal circulation allows for circulatory arrest during surgery on the ascending aorta. Two different methods are used either lowering the temperature of the blood by 10 °C at a time, gradient cooling, or as cold as possible, crash cooling. The distribution of hypothermia is expected to be different for the two methods, the latter predominantly cooling the body core. The influence on the physiological response is expected to vary with the two methods. The surgical procedure and the cooling greatly elicit a stress response and the coagulation is profoundly influenced. There can be adverse effects on the neurological outcome due to the procedure. The two methods are considered equal, but have never been subjected to comparison. The surgery and circulatory changes can have a negative influence on the cerebral outcome . METHODS: Twenty patients between 18 and 80 yrs randomized either to crash cooling or gradient cooling, ten patients in each group.. Patients with severe comorbidities or known coagulopathy are excluded. Anesthesia and operation as performed routinely in the department. The primary endpoint is duration of cooling, secondary endpoints include coagulation parameters (thromboelastography, clot stability), stress response parameters (adhesion molecule expression on endothelial cells, oxidative stress analysis, inflammatory markers), neuropsychological tests, MRI of the cerebrum, markers of cerebral ischemia, and ultrasound imaging of the great vessels for detection of air bubbles. Baseline values are obtained for all parameters.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Mar 2011
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 7, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 2, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedMarch 21, 2012
March 1, 2012
1.5 years
January 7, 2011
March 20, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Duration of cooling
intraoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (7)
MRI of cerebrum
Baseline prior to surgery and 4 to 5 days postoperatively
Markers of neurological injury
baseline, postoperative
neurological exam
baseline, postoperative, after 4 months
cognitive test
baseline, postoperative, after 4 months
markers of elevated inflammatory response
perioperatively
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Gradient cooling group
Study group receiving gradient cooling during the procedure using extracorporeal circulation (ECC). The procedure is used routinely in the department and is not an experimental procedure. A maximum of 10 degrees celsius is allowed between the measured nasopharyngeal body temperature and the heater-cooler unit of the ECC-machine, when cooling or rewarming.
Crash cooling group
Study group receiving rapid cooling using extracorporeal circulation. The protocol for rapid cooling is using routinely in the department and is not an experimental procedure. When cooling, the investigators aim for maximal difference in temperature between the heater-cooler unit of the ECC-machine.
Eligibility Criteria
Tertiary care clinic. Patients eligible for planned ascending aorta aneurism repair under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest.
You may qualify if:
- Patients scheduled for surgery on the ascending aorta
- Need for deep hypothermic circulatory arrest during the procedure
You may not qualify if:
- Known coagulopathy
- Ejection fraction less than 30 %
- Severe psychiatric or neurological disease
- Severe liver disease
- Severely reduced lung function
- Glomerular filtration rate less than 15 ml/min/1.73 m2
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Aarhuslead
- Aarhus University Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Department of anesthesia and intensive care, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby
Aarhus, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark
Biospecimen
Bloodsamples serum plasma
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 7, 2011
First Posted
March 2, 2011
Study Start
March 1, 2011
Primary Completion
September 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
March 21, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-03