NCT01298167

Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to look at which nonpermanent superficial closure method, cyanoacrylate tissue glue or fast absorbing gut suture, leads to a better cosmetic and functional outcome in repairs of facial wounds after Mohs surgery.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
14

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2011

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2011

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 15, 2011

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 17, 2011

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2011

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2012

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 9, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

November 9, 2012

Status Verified

October 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

February 15, 2011

Results QC Date

September 10, 2012

Last Update Submit

October 10, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

CyanoacrylateFast Absorbing GutMohs SurgeryEpidermal closure method

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The Visual Analog or Analogue Scale (VAS)\* is designed to present to the respondent a rating scale with minimum constraints. Respondents mark the location on the 10-centimeter line corresponding to their feeling. It also gives the maximum opportunity for each respondent to express a personal response style. The scale is interpreted as the greater the scale score (as the score approaches 10), the greater the cosmetic and functional outcome of the healed wound. * Aitken, R. C. B. (1969). Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine. 62, 989 - 993 * Freyd, M. (1923). The graphic rating scale. Journal of Educational Psychology, 43, 83 - 102 * Hayes, M. H. S. \& D. G. Patterson (1921). Experimental development of the graphic rating method. Psychological Bulletin, 18, 98-99

    3 months

Study Arms (2)

Cyanoacrylate Superior/Inferior

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This arm contains data from only the Cyanoacrylate used on superior ½ of wounds \& inferior ½ of wounds in randomized patients to determine the impact of Cyanoacrylate tissue glue versus Fast Absorbing Gut suture.

Device: Cyanoacrylate tissue glue versus Fast absorbing gut

Fast Absorbing Gut Suture Superior/Inferior

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This arm contains data from only the Fast Absorbing Gut Suture used on superior ½ of wounds \& inferior ½ of wounds in randomized patients to determine the impact of Cyanoacrylate tissue glue versus Fast absorbing gut suture.

Device: Cyanoacrylate tissue glue versus Fast absorbing gut

Interventions

All wounds will be closed using a linear, bilayered closure method, where the buried intradermal absorbing suture (5-0, Polysorb) will be placed along the length of the incision, consistent with standard surgical procedure. Only patients with wounds with a length of 3cm or greater will be enrolled. Each wound will be measured, and the length divided in half. Half of the surgical wound will be randomly selected (by coin toss) for epidermal reapproximation with cyanoacrylate, whereas the other half will be repaired with 6-0 fast absorbing gut suture in standard running fashion.

Cyanoacrylate Superior/InferiorFast Absorbing Gut Suture Superior/Inferior

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The subject is willing and able to give informed consent.
  • The subject is willing and able to participate in the study as an outpatient and is willing to comply with study requirements.
  • The subject is 18 years of age or older.
  • The subject has a diagnosis of a non-melanoma skin cancer on the face requiring Mohs micrographic surgery.
  • The subjects also has a final wound length of 3cm or greater.
  • The subject is able to abide by the protocol of standard postoperative care and is able to attend standard post-operative visits at 3 months after the surgery.

You may not qualify if:

  • The subject is on systemic immunosuppressants and/or is an organ transplant recipients.
  • The subject has reported or suspected hypersensitivity to cyanoacrylate or fast absorbing gut suture.
  • The subject has a dermatologic disease in the target site that may interfere with examination.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Yale Dermatologic Surgery

New Haven, Connecticut, 06510, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Kim J, Singh Maan H, Cool AJ, Hanlon AM, Leffell DJ. Fast Absorbing Gut Suture versus Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive in the Epidermal Closure of Linear Repairs Following Mohs Micrographic Surgery. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2015 Feb;8(2):24-9.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Basal CellCarcinoma, Squamous Cell

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CarcinomaNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsNeoplasms, Basal CellNeoplasms, Squamous Cell

Results Point of Contact

Title
David Leffell, MD
Organization
Yale University

Study Officials

  • David Leffell, MD

    Yale University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2011

First Posted

February 17, 2011

Study Start

February 1, 2011

Primary Completion

August 1, 2011

Study Completion

August 1, 2012

Last Updated

November 9, 2012

Results First Posted

November 9, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-10

Locations