Using Technology to Augment the Implementation and Effectiveness of PCIT

NCT01294488 | Completed Phase 2 DMC

• 1 other identifier: CDC-NCIPC-5085
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 317
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The overarching aim of the proposed study is to test the implementation effectiveness of two implementation approaches-Remote Real-Time (RRT) using the internet telemedicine technology and traditional Phone Consultation (PC) for training practitioners in PCIT. The study will add to emerging knowledge about how technology can facilitate the transport of evidence-based intervention models into field settings.

Conditions

Child Externalizing Problems

Keywords

PCIT; Child Maltreatment Prevention; Practitioner Fidelity

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Child Maltreatment

  12 months

Study Arms (2)

Phone Consultation

EXPERIMENTAL

Therapists receive phone consultation for 6 months during the course of the project.

Behavioral: Parent-Child Interaction Therapy

Remote Real-Time Consultation

EXPERIMENTAL

Therapists receive consultation for 6 months via polycommunication technology.

Behavioral: Parent-Child Interaction Therapy

Interventions

Parent-Child Interaction Therapy BEHAVIORAL

Therapists receive training in Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) and receive supervision in their implementation of PCIT skills via phone consultation and polycommunication technology, each for 6 months.

Phone Consultation; Remote Real-Time Consultation

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 20 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• The agency should be committed to developing a PCIT program, not simply training staff. There should be a commitment by leadership to the program's long-term sustainability, including sustaining the program through staff turn-over.
• The agency should identify a minimum of three staff for PCIT training (with two staff members acceptable from very small agencies that do not have three child service providers), at least one of which is a supervisor. Licensed mental health practitioner staff with a Master's degree or higher are strongly preferred, although exceptions may be made in cases where agencies do not have Master's level staff. (For example, some agencies conducting culturally relevant programs for minority or rural populations are not always able to employ licensed mental health provider staff. Because RRT may be especially salient for some of these agencies, these agencies will not be excluded from the study.)
• The agency should be committed to providing the resources and staff availability to complete the basic PCIT training package, standard PC consultation, and staff participation in approximately six months of RRT training.
• The agency should have or be in the process of developing the physical infrastructure to deliver PCIT. Physical infrastructure includes PCIT rooms with sound equipment, bug-in-the-ear equipment, and video recording equipment.
• The agency will need to have a dedicated broadband internet line for the RRT equipment.
• The agency should be able to demonstrate that it has or will develop a referral network sufficient to provide enough PCIT cases so that therapists can develop mastery. This can include referral commitments and support from local child welfare offices, courts, schools, and so forth. If the agency plans to serve child welfare parents whose children are in foster care, it is imperative that there are firm commitments for a transportation plan. Preliminary work may be necessary to gain the cooperation of child welfare and courts to insure that service plans and court orders are consistent with PCIT (i.e. allowing joint parent-child sessions).
• The agency agrees that basic PCIT training will meet OUHSC training guidelines (to be described later).
• If clients consent to participate, the agency agrees to archive video recordings of all PCIT sessions and basic PCIT clinical measures from clients.
• The agency is in a state that agrees to provide OUHSC with child welfare outcome data.
• In the event the agency's PCIT start-up plan requires that they begin PCIT services prior to the start of the study, they will commence archiving session and client data so that early session fidelity and competency and client outcomes can be tracked. Standard PC consultation will be provided until the study begins. Session- and client-level data are routinely collected as part of PCIT implementation, to guide clinical intervention and assure quality of services. However, no data will be used for research purposes unless therapists and clients provide informed consent for its use.
• The study will retain the right to involuntarily remove an agency and its therapists from the study if PCIT implementation and data collection at the agency proves infeasible.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: lead

Study Sites (1)

OUHSC

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73190, United States

Location

Study Officials

• Beverly Funderburk, Ph.D.

  OUHSC

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: phase 2
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: PREVENTION
• Intervention Model: CROSSOVER
• Sponsor Type: FED
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: February 10, 2011
• First Posted: February 11, 2011
• Study Start: January 1, 2007
• Primary Completion: August 1, 2011
• Study Completion: August 1, 2011
• Last Updated: May 8, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-05

Locations

US (1)