Oleogel-S10 in Wound Healing of Inherited Epidermolysis Bullosa (BEB-10)
Open, Prospective, Controlled Case Series Documentation to Compare Intra-individually the Efficacy and Tolerance of Sericare® Versus Non-adhesive Wound Dressing Alone in Accelerating the Epithelialization of Skin Lesions of Patients With Epidermolysis Bullosa Hereditaria
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to compare intra-individually the reepithelialization of skin lesion(s) in inherited Epidermolysis bullosa (either 1 wound ≥10 cm2 and ≤200 cm2 in size divided in 2 equal halves or 2 comparable wounds of ≥5 cm2 each) treated with Oleogel-S10 and non-adhesive wound dressing versus non-adhesive wound dressing only.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Nov 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 27, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 11, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 23, 2018
CompletedJanuary 23, 2018
May 1, 2017
7 months
October 27, 2010
October 22, 2016
May 27, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Intra-individual Difference in Reepithelialization of Wound (Halves) at Day 14 in 'Recent Wounds' or Day 28 in 'Chronic Wounds'
The primary end point was the progress of reepithelialization from baseline to either Day 14 ('recent wounds') or Day 28 ('chronic wounds') of the EB wound (half) treated with Oleogel-S10 and non-adhesive wound dressing (Mepilex®) intra-individually compared to the other wound (half) covered with non-adhesive wound dressing only (intra-individual comparison). Two independent experts were blind to treatment and assessed efficacy based on chronological series of cropped and coded photographs by wound (half) that were taken before start of treatment, during wound dressing changes and at the end of treatment on Day 14/Day 28. They evaluated each series and decided whether 1 wound (half) reepithelialized faster than the other ('winner'), or whether there was no difference in reepithelialization.
14 days for 'recent wounds', 28 days for 'chronic wounds'
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Percentage of Wound Epithelialization at Day 7±1
Day 7±1
Percentage of Wound Epithelialization at Day 14±1
Day 14±1
Study Arms (2)
Oleogel-S10
EXPERIMENTALThe eligible wound (half) was topically treated with Oleogel-S10 and covered with a non-adhesive wound dressing (Mepilex®) on Day 0. Wound dressings were changed about every 24 to 48 hours until discharge from hospital or until the end of treatment at Day 14 in 'recent wounds' or Day 28 in 'chronic wounds'.
Non-adhesive wound dressing
OTHERMepilex® soft silicone faced polyurethane foam dressing was used as non-active comparator. The eligible wound (half) was covered with Mepilex® as control on Day 0. Wound dressings were changed about every 24 to 48 hours until discharge from hospital or until the end of treatment at Day 14 in 'recent wounds' or Day 28 in 'chronic wounds'.
Interventions
1 cm or 125 µL or 115 mg Oleogel-S10 per cm2 wound area (corresponds to thickness of approximately 1 mm or 0.04 inch) every 24 to 48 hours until discharge from hospital or until the end of treatment at Day 14 in 'recent wounds' or Day 28 in 'chronic wounds'.
Mepilex® soft silicone faced polyurethane foam dressing was changed about every 24 to 48 hours until discharge from hospital or until the end of treatment at Day 14 in 'recent wounds' or Day 28 in 'chronic wounds'.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 1-95 years
- Patient and/or his/her legal representative was informed, read and understood the patient information/informed consent form and gave written informed consent
- Patients with inherited EB with at least 1 skin lesion between 10 cm2 and 200 cm2 (alternatively 2 comparable lesions of at least 5 cm2 each)
- Patient and/or his/her legal representative was able and willing to follow study procedures and instructions including the following:
- Application of Oleogel-S10 on (1 half of) the wound at every wound dressing change
- Regular visits during the treatment period (14 days in 'recent wounds' to 28 days in 'chronic wounds')
- Negative pregnancy test in women of childbearing potential within 7 days before start of treatment
- Women of childbearing potential agreed to use an effective method of contraception (Pearl Index \< 1, e.g. hormonal contraception including the combined oral contraceptive pill, the transdermal patch, and the contraceptive vaginal ring, intrauterine devices or sterilization) during treatment and for at least 6 months thereafter
- Men of procreative capacity agreed to use an effective method of contraception during treatment and for at least 6 months thereafter
You may not qualify if:
- Systemic treatment with steroids during the last 30 days
- Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or diabetic ulcers
- Diseases or conditions that could, in the opinion of the investigator, interfere with the assessment of safety, tolerance or efficacy
- Skin disorders adversely affecting wound healing or involving the areas eligible for study treatment
- Hypersensitivity to the trial medication or surgical dressings to be used
- Multiple allergic disorders
- Administration of investigational drugs within 3 months before screening
- Investigations or changes in management for an existing medical condition
- Low probability to complete the study per protocol for whatever reason
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Birken AGlead
Study Sites (1)
EB Center at the Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79104, Germany
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Small sample size, subjects with dystrophic Epidermolysis bullosa only, difficult wound size analysis at fixed study days due to several episodes of re-trauma in both intervention and control wounds
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Head of Clinical Development
- Organization
- Amryt Pharma
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Agnes Schwieger-Briel, MD
University Medical Center Freiburg
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Blinded comparison of wound photo series by two independent experts
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 27, 2010
First Posted
February 11, 2011
Study Start
November 1, 2010
Primary Completion
June 1, 2011
Study Completion
June 1, 2011
Last Updated
January 23, 2018
Results First Posted
January 23, 2018
Record last verified: 2017-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share