Transcranial Doppler on Admission of Patients With Mild to Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury
TCD
Prospective, Multicentre, Observational Study
1 other identifier
observational
369
1 country
21
Brief Summary
Patients with mild to moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI) are at risk for secondary neurological deterioration. Their outcome within the first week after injury could be predicted by clinical signs, brain CT scan and transcranial doppler (TCD) on admission to the emergency room. The investigators aim to evaluate the diagnostic performance of TCD to screen patients presented with mild to moderate TBI and mild lesions on CT scan, i.e., Trauma Coma Data Bank, TCDB classification II. The principal outcome measure is the negative predictive value of TCD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Feb 2011
Typical duration for all trials
21 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 7, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 8, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2013
CompletedApril 28, 2014
April 1, 2014
2.7 years
February 7, 2011
April 25, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Negative predictive value of transcranial doppler
Patient with mild to moderate traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale 9-15) and a CT scan (TCDB II).TCD is performed within 8 hours after the trauma. Aggravation defined by: * a decrease in the Glasgow Coma Scale of 2 points or more from the initial value, in the absence of pharmacological sedation. * a neurological deterioration sufficient to warrant intervention: mechanical ventilation, sedation, osmotherapy, barbiturates, transfer to more intensive care, or neurosurgical intervention.
within the first week after the injury
Secondary Outcomes (2)
the impact of transcranial doppler for initial patient management
within the first week after trauma
Secondary neurological aggravation: risk factors and consequences.
neurological outcome on D7 and D28
Study Arms (1)
Mild TBI with mild lesions on CT scan
Negative predictive value of transcranial doppler for patients with mild to moderate traumatic brain injury and mild brain lesions on initial CT scan (TCDB II)
Interventions
Negative predictive value of transcranial doppler in patients with mild to moderate traumatic brain injury
Eligibility Criteria
Primary admission of patients following mild to moderate traumatic brain injury who need exploration with brain CT scan.
You may qualify if:
- years of age or more
- primary admission for mild TBI (GCS 14-15) or moderate (GCS 9-13) TBI.
- with or without multiple injury.
- with no hemodynamic or respiratory distress: SAP \>90mmHg, SPO2 \>92%,hemoglobin \> 8 g/dl.
- with mild brain lesions on CTscan according to the traumatic coma data bank classification (TCDB) II: diffuse injury with cisterns present and no midline shift, mixed density lesions \<25 ml.
- Transcranial Doppler within 8 hours after the trauma.
- patient affiliated to the social security system or equivalent
You may not qualify if:
- Severe TBI (GCS\<9)
- Penetrating TBI
- patient with no brain CT scan
- patient with normal brain CT scan (TCDB I), or severe brain CT scan (TCDB III-IV)
- Hemodynamic or respiratory distress
- Patient treated with anticoagulants: oral anticoagulant, heparin, anti-platelet agent (except Aspirin)
- previous intracranial surgery
- Patient with sedation and mechanical ventilation
- transcranial Doppler unable
- patient deprived of freedom by judicial or administrative decision
- Follow up at 7 days impossible
- Refusal consent to use data for statistics
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (21)
CHRA Annecy
Annecy, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, 74000, France
CHU Grenoble
Grenoble, Isere, 38043, France
Ch Belley
Belley, France
CHU
Besançon, France
Ch Briancon
Briançon, France
Ch Cannes
Cannes, France
Ch Chambery
Chambéry, France
CHU
Clermont-Ferrand, France
CHU
Dijon, France
Ch Grasse
Grasse, France
Chu Edouard Herriot
Lyon, France
CHU Lyon
Lyon, France
CHU Pierre Benite
Lyon, France
CH Nantes
Nantes, France
Chu Nimes
Nîmes, France
Ch Saint Jean de Maurienne
Saint-Jean-de-Maurienne, France
Ch Saint Julien En Genevois
Saint-Julien-en-Genevois, France
Hopitaux Du Pays Du Mont Blanc
Sallanches, France
Ch Thonon Les Bains
Thonon-les-Bains, France
CH Valence
Valence, France
Ch Voiron
Voiron, France
Related Publications (11)
Thornhill S, Teasdale GM, Murray GD, McEwen J, Roy CW, Penny KI. Disability in young people and adults one year after head injury: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2000 Jun 17;320(7250):1631-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7250.1631.
PMID: 10856063BACKGROUNDDavis DP, Kene M, Vilke GM, Sise MJ, Kennedy F, Eastman AB, Velky T, Hoyt DB. Head-injured patients who "talk and die": the San Diego perspective. J Trauma. 2007 Feb;62(2):277-81. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31802ef4a3.
PMID: 17297312BACKGROUNDLivingston DH, Lavery RF, Passannante MR, Skurnick JH, Baker S, Fabian TC, Fry DE, Malangoni MA. Emergency department discharge of patients with a negative cranial computed tomography scan after minimal head injury. Ann Surg. 2000 Jul;232(1):126-32. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200007000-00018.
PMID: 10862205BACKGROUNDMarshall LF, Marshall SB, Klauber MR, van Berkum Clark M, Eisenberg HM, Jane JA, et al. A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography. J Neurosurg 1991; 75: S14-S20.
BACKGROUNDWardlaw JM, Easton VJ, Statham P. Which CT features help predict outcome after head injury? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002 Feb;72(2):188-92; discussion 151. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.72.2.188.
PMID: 11796768BACKGROUNDSifri ZC, Homnick AT, Vaynman A, Lavery R, Liao W, Mohr A, Hauser CJ, Manniker A, Livingston D. A prospective evaluation of the value of repeat cranial computed tomography in patients with minimal head injury and an intracranial bleed. J Trauma. 2006 Oct;61(4):862-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000224225.54982.90.
PMID: 17033552BACKGROUNDaf Geijerstam JL, Oredsson S, Britton M; OCTOPUS Study Investigators. Medical outcome after immediate computed tomography or admission for observation in patients with mild head injury: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2006 Sep 2;333(7566):465. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38918.669317.4F. Epub 2006 Aug 8.
PMID: 16895944BACKGROUNDStein SC, Burnett MG, Glick HA. Indications for CT scanning in mild traumatic brain injury: A cost-effectiveness study. J Trauma. 2006 Sep;61(3):558-66. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000233766.60315.5e.
PMID: 16966987BACKGROUNDWhite H, Venkatesh B. Applications of transcranial Doppler in the ICU: a review. Intensive Care Med. 2006 Jul;32(7):981-94. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0173-y. Epub 2006 May 10.
PMID: 16791661BACKGROUNDMcQuire JC, Sutcliffe JC, Coats TJ. Early changes in middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity after head injury. J Neurosurg. 1998 Oct;89(4):526-32. doi: 10.3171/jns.1998.89.4.0526.
PMID: 9761044BACKGROUNDJaffres P, Brun J, Declety P, Bosson JL, Fauvage B, Schleiermacher A, Kaddour A, Anglade D, Jacquot C, Payen JF. Transcranial Doppler to detect on admission patients at risk for neurological deterioration following mild and moderate brain trauma. Intensive Care Med. 2005 Jun;31(6):785-90. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2630-4. Epub 2005 Apr 16.
PMID: 15834704BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jean Francois Payen, MD
University Hospital, Grenoble
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 7, 2011
First Posted
February 8, 2011
Study Start
February 1, 2011
Primary Completion
October 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2013
Last Updated
April 28, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-04