Comparison of Kinematics for Subjects Implanted With a PFC Sigma Rotating Platform or Fixed Bearing TC3 Prosthesis
PFC & TC3
In Vivo Comparison of Kinematics for Subjects Implanted With a Press Fit Condylar Sigma Rotating Platform or Fixed Bearing Total Condylar III Prothesis
2 other identifiers
observational
22
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The objectives of this study are four-fold:
- 1.To determine the three-dimensional, in vivo kinematics for subjects having either a fixed- or mobile-bearing Press Fit Condylar (PFC) Sigma Total Condylar III Prosthesis, comparing the in vivo kinematics to determine if one implant type leads to a benefit for the patient.
- 2.To determine if bearing mobility occurs in PFC Sigma Rotating Platform Total Condylar III Prosthesis under in vivo, weight-bearing conditions during multiple activities (gait, stair descent, deep knee bend and chair rise).
- 3.To determine if there is a correlation between in vivo kinematic data obtained using fluoroscopy, electromyography (EMG) and ground reaction force (GRF) data and determine if variability occurs between these two TKA types.
- 4.To determine if a clinical benefit is either visibly detected (video camera) or quantifiably determined (questionnaire) for either TKA type.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Feb 2011
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 3, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 7, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 7, 2014
CompletedOctober 21, 2019
October 1, 2019
7 months
February 3, 2011
March 18, 2013
October 8, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
In Vivo Linear Kinematics for Fixed-bearing and Rotating Platform (RP) TKA System During 4 Weight-bearing Activities.
The values that were reported indicate the motion of the contact point from the start of the activity to the end of the activity. If the point translated forward (anteriorly) atop the tibial tray, the number was reported as positive. If the point traveled backwards (posteriorly) atop the tibial tray, the number was reported as negative.
March 2013
In Vivo Angular Kinematics for Fixed-bearing and Rotating Platform (RP) TKA System During 4 Weight-bearing Activities.
Angular kinematics for fixed bearing and rotating platform TKA system - Axial Rotation The values that were reported indicate the rotation of the femur atop the tibial tray from the start of the activity to the end of the activity. If the femur rotated externally (posterior rollback of the lateral condyle, generally pivoted about the medial condyle), the number was reported as positive. If the femur rotated internally (anterior slide of the lateral condyle, generally pivoted about the medial condyle), the number was reported as negative.
March 2013
Study Arms (2)
TC3 TKA
Subjects implanted with a DePuy fixed-bearing Total Condylar III (TC3) TKA
PFC RP TC3 TKA
Subjects implanted with a DePuy PFC Rotating Platform TC3 TKA
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Subjects requiring total knee arthroplasty
You may qualify if:
- Patients must be at least three months post-operative.
- Potential subjects will have a body weight of less than 250 lbs.
- Candidates must have had a HSS score \>90 post-operatively.
- Patients must have passive flexion of at least 100.
- All potential subjects will have a Press Fit Condylar (PFC) Rotating Platform Total Condylar III Prosthesis (Depuy Orthopaedics, Warsaw, IN) or fixed-bearing Total Condylar III Prosthesis.
- Must be willing to sign both Informed Consent and HIPAA forms.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant females.
- Patients that do not meet study requirements.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The University of Tennessee, Knoxvillelead
- DePuy Orthopaedicscollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Porter Adventist Hospital
Denver, Colorado, 80210, United States
Perkins Hall
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37996, United States
Science and Engineering Research Facility
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37996, United States
Limitations and Caveats
No limitations were encountered.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Richard Komistek, Professor
- Organization
- The University of Tennessee
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Richard D. Komistek, Ph D
The University of Tennessee
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Douglas Dennis, MD
Colorado Joint Replacement, Porter Adventist Hosp
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 3, 2011
First Posted
February 7, 2011
Study Start
February 1, 2011
Primary Completion
September 1, 2011
Study Completion
February 1, 2013
Last Updated
October 21, 2019
Results First Posted
March 7, 2014
Record last verified: 2019-10