The Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Hemodynamic Response During Double Lumen Endotracheal Intubation
The Effect of Prophylactic Dexmedetomidine on Hemodynamic Disturbances During Double Lumen Endotracheal Intubation. A Double-blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
2 other identifiers
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic responses during laryngoscopy and double lumen endotracheal intubation and assess the adverse effect related to complications of dexmedetomidine.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Mar 2011
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 4, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2011
CompletedDecember 15, 2011
December 1, 2011
9 months
February 1, 2011
December 14, 2011
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
change in systolic blood pressure
direct arterial pressure monitoring
(day 1) before induction, before intubation and every minute for the first 10 minutes after endotracheal intubation
change in diastolic blood pressure
direct arterial pressure monitoring
(day 1) before induction, before intubation and every minute for the first 10 minutes after endotracheal intubation
change in mean arterial pressure
direct arterial pressure monitoring
(day 1) before induction, before intubation and every minute for the first 10 minutes after endotracheal intubation
change in heart rate
(day 1) before induction, before intubation and every minute for the first 10 minutes after endotracheal intubation
Secondary Outcomes (1)
adverse events related to dexmedetomidine
(day 1) during dexmedetomidine administration until 10 minutes after endotracheal intubation
Study Arms (2)
dexmedetomidine
ACTIVE COMPARATORcontrol
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
dexmedetomidine 0.7 microgram per kilogram in saline 20 ml given within 10 minutes before intubation
normal saline 20 ml( the same volume as dexmedetomidine) giving within 10 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA Physical Status I-III
- Undergoing Elective Thoracotomy or Thoracoscopy
- Required Left Sided-double Lumen Endotracheal Intubation
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with bradycardia (heart rate \< 50 beat per minute) or heart block
- Suspected of Difficult Intubation
- Patients Who Are at Risk for Rapid Change of Hemodynamics
- Allergic to Dexmedetomidine
- Hepatic or Renal Impairment (Preoperative Serum Creatinine \> 1.5 mg/dl)
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Chiang Mai University Hospital
Maung, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand
Related Publications (3)
Basar H, Akpinar S, Doganci N, Buyukkocak U, Kaymak C, Sert O, Apan A. The effects of preanesthetic, single-dose dexmedetomidine on induction, hemodynamic, and cardiovascular parameters. J Clin Anesth. 2008 Sep;20(6):431-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.04.007.
PMID: 18929283BACKGROUNDMaguire A, Thompson JP, Guest C, Sadler PJ, Strupish JW, West KJ. Comparison of the effects of intravenous alfentanil and esmolol on the cardiovascular response to double-lumen endobronchial intubation. Anaesthesia. 2001 Apr;56(4):319-25. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.01917.x.
PMID: 11284817BACKGROUNDPipanmekaporn T, Punjasawadwong Y, Charuluxananan S, Lapisatepun W, Bunburaphong P. The effect of prophylactic dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic disturbances to double-lumen endotracheal intubation: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2013;2013:236089. doi: 10.1155/2013/236089. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
PMID: 23983684DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tanyong Pipanmekaporn, MD
Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University , Chiang Mai, Thailand,50200
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 1, 2011
First Posted
February 4, 2011
Study Start
March 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2011
Study Completion
December 1, 2011
Last Updated
December 15, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-12