NCT01289418

Brief Summary

Influenza vaccines are continuously modified to adjust to the virus antigenic shifts or drifts, and its safety profile may vary. While generally considered safe, influenza vaccines have been associated in the past with increases in cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome (1976) or with oculorespiratory syndrome (2001). The emergence of a novel strain of H1N1 influenza virus (pH1N1) has prompted health departments worldwide to prepare for mass vaccination campaigns with a new H1N1 pandemic vaccine. Following recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO), Canada immunized its population with a dose-sparing adjuvanted vaccine. While the adjuvant developed by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) has been administered to over 39 000 people, only a few hundred will have been vaccinated with the H1N1 formulation in clinical trials before the mass campaign was launched. With this small number, adverse events occurring at a rate \< 1% will not be detected by these clinical trials. Considering that most cases of pH1N1 to date have been relatively mild, it will be imperative to rapidly detect adverse events serious enough to reconsider the use of the vaccine. Passive surveillance is collecting notifications of adverse events but the sensitivity of this system is not high and its timeliness is not necessarily optimal. In Canada, healthcare workers (HCW) are among those who were offered the new pandemic vaccine in priority. Because they were offered the vaccine early in the campaign and because they constitute a well-defined group in good general health, this group of people may be well suited for monitoring the safety of the pH1N1 vaccine. The main objective of this project was to estimate in HCW vaccinated against pH1N1 the frequency of adverse events of sufficient severity to cause work absenteeism or medical consultation. The active surveillance was done in HCW from 3 sites (Canadian hospitals) participating in the Pandemic Influenza Research Network (PCIRN): (1) Halifax (Nova Scotia), (2) Quebec City (Quebec): 3 hospitals, (3) Toronto

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
6,525

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2009

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2009

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2010

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2010

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 2, 2011

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 3, 2011

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 14, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

August 21, 2012

Status Verified

August 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

February 2, 2011

Results QC Date

July 9, 2012

Last Update Submit

August 15, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

H1N1vaccine safetyadverse eventshealth care workers

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Number of Participants Who Had Experienced a New Health Problem or the Worsening of an Existing Health Condition That Resulted in a Medical Consultation.

    at day 8, 15 and 29

  • Number of Participants Who Had Experienced a New Health Problem or the Worsening of an Existing Health Condition That Resulted in Work Absenteeism.

    day 8, 15 and 29

  • the Occurrence of Serious Adverse Events (SAE)

    6 months

Study Arms (3)

Health care workers in Québec

Health care workers from CHUQ hospitals

Health care workers in Toronto

Health care workers from the Mount Sinai Hospital

Health care workers in Halifax

Health care workers from the Queen Elizabeth Hospital

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

The active surveillance was conducted in three Canadian hospitals participating in the Public Health Agency of Canada/Canadian Institutes for Health Research- Influenza Research Network (PCIRN): Quebec City, Toronto, and Halifax. Healthcare workers immunized in these institutions were offered to participate in a web-based active surveillance of vaccine safety.

You may qualify if:

  • To be a health care worker from one of the three Canadian Hospitals participating in the Public Health Agency of Canada/Canadian Institutes for Health Research- Influenza Research Network (PCIRN): Quebec City, Toronto, and Halifax.
  • To have been immunized with the pH1N1 vaccine.
  • To have an email address.
  • To be 18 years old and older.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • De Serres G, Gariepy MC, Coleman B, Rouleau I, McNeil S, Benoit M, McGeer A, Ambrose A, Needham J, Bergeron C, Grenier C, Sleigh K, Kallos A, Ouakki M, Ouhoummane N, Stiver G, Valiquette L, McCarthy A, Bettinger J; PHAC-CIHR influenza Research Network (PCIRN). Short and long-term safety of the 2009 AS03-adjuvanted pandemic vaccine. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e38563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038563. Epub 2012 Jul 3.

Limitations and Caveats

Only 52% answered the 3 surveys. We don't know why 48% didn't complete the 3 surveys (were they too sick or not motivated).We didn't have a group of comparable unvaccinated individuals (to estimate the risks attributable to the vaccine).

Results Point of Contact

Title
Gaston De Serres
Organization
Laval University

Study Officials

  • Gaston De Serres, MD, PhD

    Institut National en Santé Publique du Québec

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Epidemiologist at the National Institute of Public Health of Quebec and professor of epidemiology at the University Laval

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2011

First Posted

February 3, 2011

Study Start

October 1, 2009

Primary Completion

May 1, 2010

Study Completion

May 1, 2010

Last Updated

August 21, 2012

Results First Posted

August 14, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-08