Prevention of Ovulation Achieved by Single Intra-vaginal Administration of Levogel as Compared to Oral LNG
A Randomized, Cross-over, Clinical Trial to Assess the Prevention of Ovulation Achieved by Single Intra-vaginal Administration of 0.75 mg Levonorgestrel (LNG) Gel (Levogel) as Compared to 1.5 mg Oral LNG
1 other identifier
interventional
20
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
It has been proposed that levonorgestrel (LNG) in a vaginal gel could be used as an 'on demand' contraceptive when used before coitus. Levonorgestrel was selected as it is a component of many approved oral contraceptive pills and also it is the active agent in Plan B, an FDA-approved regimen for emergency contraception (EC). In previous studies it was demonstrated that an LNG vaginal gel was absorbed and was effective in preventing follicular rupture. The overall proportion of cycles with lack of follicular rupture within 5 days of LNG administration or with ovulatory dysfunction (follicle rupture preceded by an inadequate LH surge) was 96% for LNG gel and 39% in the inert gel cycles (control group).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started Jan 2011
Longer than P75 for phase_1
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 28, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 31, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2014
CompletedAugust 15, 2017
August 1, 2017
3.8 years
January 28, 2011
August 11, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of LNG gel and oral LNG on follicle rupture
The main objective of the study is to compare the effect of LNG gel and oral LNG on follicle rupture as assessed by ultrasound.
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Evaluate effect of single intra-vaginal administration
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Levonorgestrel (LNG) gel (Levogel)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis is a randomized study with a cross-over design comparing two single dose treatment sequences of either Levogel (LNG vaginal gel 0.750 mg/4g) or oral LNG (1.5mg). All women with a leading follicle diameter of ≥18 mm will be randomized to treatment with a single intra-vaginal application of LNG gel or oral LNG. After a washout cycle, the women will be crossed over to receive the other treatment and the study procedures will be repeated.
oral LNG (1.5mg)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis is a randomized study with a cross-over design comparing two single dose treatment sequences of either Levogel (LNG vaginal gel 0.750 mg/4g) or oral LNG (1.5mg). All women with a leading follicle diameter of ≥18 mm will be randomized to treatment with a single intra-vaginal application of LNG gel or oral LNG. After a washout cycle, the women will be crossed over to receive the other treatment and the study procedures will be repeated.
Interventions
This is a randomized study with a cross-over design comparing two single dose treatment sequences of either Levogel (LNG vaginal gel 0.750 mg/4g) or oral LNG (1.5mg). All women with a leading follicle diameter of ≥18 mm will be randomized to treatment with a single intra-vaginal application of LNG gel or oral LNG. After a washout cycle, the women will be crossed over to receive the other treatment and the study procedures will be repeated.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy women aged 21-39 years with regular menstrual cycles (25-35 days) and not at risk of pregnancy.
You may not qualify if:
- All contraindications to the use of progestins
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Instituto Chileno de Medicina Reproductiva
José Victorino Lastarria 29, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile
Profamilia
Socorro Sanchez No. 160, Santo Domingo Province, Apartado Postal 1053, Dominican Republic
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Vivian Brache, Lic.
Profamilia
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Regine Sitruk-Ware, PhD.
Population Council
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
María José Miranda Gaete, MD
Instituto Chileno de Medicina Reproductiva
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 28, 2011
First Posted
January 31, 2011
Study Start
January 1, 2011
Primary Completion
November 1, 2014
Study Completion
November 1, 2014
Last Updated
August 15, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-08