Comparison in Japan T80/A5 (Telmisartan 80 mg and Amlodipine 5 mg) and T40/A5 (Telmisartan 40 mg and Amlodipine 5 mg)
An Eight-week Randomised Double-blind Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Telmisartan 80mg Plus Amlodipine 5 mg Fixed-dose Combination vs. Telmisartan 40 mg Plus Amlodipine 5 mg Fixed-dose Combination in Patients With Hypertension
1 other identifier
interventional
225
1 country
8
Brief Summary
Blood pressure in hypertensive patients is rarely controlled to an optimal level by one drug alone, often a combination of two or more drugs is essential to achieve a sufficient antihypertensive effect. Therefore in Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH) 2009 combination therapy is recommended. In JSH 2009 it is advised to start the combination therapy at a low dose, and to increase the dosage when the antihypertensive effect is not sufficient. In the Japanese long-term safety study, 259 patients received the T40/A5 mg fixed-dose combination (FDC), and after 6 weeks treatment 48 patients of them could not control their blood pressure (DBP =90) (U09-2494-01). For those patients who cannot control their blood pressure with T40/A5 mg FDC, a switch to a higher dose such as T80/A5 mg is recommended. In the overseas 4x4 factorial design trial, a clinically meaningful difference of the blood pressure lowering effect between T80/A5 mg free combination and T40/A5 mg free combination was shown (U07-3503-02). But the sponsor has no data that verifies this difference in Japanese patients. Thus, this clinical trial is being conducted to investigate the antihypertensive effect and safety of high dose T80/A5 mg FDC compared with low dose T40/A5 mg FDC in Japanese patients with essential hypertension. In this trial, a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel group comparison method is employed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3 hypertension
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 28, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 31, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 22, 2012
CompletedJune 27, 2014
January 1, 2014
8 months
January 28, 2011
September 20, 2012
June 17, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Reduction From the Reference Baseline in Mean Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Trough
Reference baseline: Status of patients after the 12-week open-label run-in period with telmisartan monotherapy followed by 40 mg telmisartan and 5 mg amlodipine combination therapy, where patients' eligibility to enter the double-blind treatment period was examined At trough: 24-hour post-dosing
Reference baseline, 8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Reduction From the Reference Baseline in Mean Seated Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Trough
Reference baseline, 8 weeks
Changes From the Reference Baseline in the 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) Mean (Relative to Dose Time) for DBP
Reference baseline, 8 weeks
Changes From the Reference Baseline in the 24-hour ABPM Mean (Relative to Dose Time) for SBP
Reference baseline, 8 weeks
Changes From the Pseudo-baseline in the 24-hour ABPM Mean (Relative to Dose Time) for DBP
Pseudo-baseline, 14 weeks
Changes From the Pseudo-baseline in the 24-hour ABPM Mean (Relative to Dose Time) for SBP
Pseudo-baseline, 14 weeks
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
80mg telmisartan and 5mg amlodipine FDC
EXPERIMENTALonce daily
40mg telmisartan and 5mg amlodipine FDC
ACTIVE COMPARATORonce daily
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Essential hypertensive patients
- If already taking antihypertensive drugs, mean seated diastolic blood pressure (DBP) must be \>=90 and \>=114 mmHg
- If not taking any antihypertensive drugs, mean seated DBP must be \>=95 and \>=114 mmHg
- Able to stop all current antihypertensive drugs without risk to the patient based on the investigators opinion.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients taking 3 or more antihypertensive drugs at signing the informed consent form
- Patients with known or suspected secondary hypertension
- Patients with clinically relevant cardiac arrhythmia
- Congestive heart failure with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III-IV
- Patients with recent cardiovascular events
- Patients with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack within last 6 months before signing the informed consent form
- Patients with a history of sudden deterioration of renal function with angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) or angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors; or patients with post-renal transplant or post-nephrectomy
- Patients who have previously experienced characteristic symptoms of angioedema (such as facial, tongue, pharyngeal, or laryngeal swelling with dyspnea) during treatment with ARBs or ACE inhibitors
- Patients with known hypersensitivity to any component of the investigational product, or a known hypersensitivity to dihydropyridine-derived drugs
- Patients with hepatic and/or renal dysfunction
- Pre-menopausal women who are nursing or pregnant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (8)
1235.37.01 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Chuo-ku,Tokyo, Japan
1235.37.07 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan
1235.37.08 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Itoshima, Fukuoka, Japan
1235.37.02 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Katsushika-ku, Tokyo, Japan
1235.37.05 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Osaka, Osaka, Japan
1235.37.03 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Ota-ku, Tokyo, Japan
1235.37.06 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Suita, Osaka, Japan
1235.37.04 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Boehringer Ingelheim Call Center
- Organization
- Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Boehringer Ingelheim
Boehringer Ingelheim
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 28, 2011
First Posted
January 31, 2011
Study Start
January 1, 2011
Primary Completion
September 1, 2011
Last Updated
June 27, 2014
Results First Posted
October 22, 2012
Record last verified: 2014-01