Comparing the Pain Experience Between Patients Who Have and Who Have Not Undergone Dermatologic Procedures
A Pilot Study of 20 Subjects: Pain Experience in Naive vs. Non-naive Subjects Undergoing Energy-based Dermatologic Procedures
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the pain experience of patients who have not had dermatologic procedures (previously "unexposed") using energy devices (lasers, radiofrequency, ultrasound, etc.) with patients who have previously had procedures (previously "exposed") using energy devices. Based on previous clinical encounters, individuals with no prior experience with cosmetic procedures appear to experience more pain. However, no study to date has thoroughly examined this observation. As a result, this study has been designed to find a possible difference in pain perception between previously exposed and unexposed patients undergoing cosmetic procedures using energy devices.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable pain
Started Feb 2011
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 27, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 28, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 5, 2014
CompletedDecember 6, 2021
December 1, 2021
3 months
January 27, 2011
September 3, 2013
December 2, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain Rated by Subjects
The mean pain scores will be compared between naïve subjects and non-naïve subjects averaged over the anatomical sites: periocular (temple), midface/cheek, and abdomen and over all the different treatments. Pain scores were recorded along a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) with 0 (no pain- better) to 10 (maximal pain-worst). This is a 10 cm long line in which the subject was asked to draw a line on the scale with 0 (no pain- better) at one end to 10 (maximal pain-worst) at the other end. The drawn line was measured on the 10 cm line using a ruler to obtain the score.
3 hours for all treatments in one visit
Study Arms (2)
Naive Subjects
OTHERSubjects who have not previously undergone energy-based dermatologic procedures in the past.
Non-Naive Subjects
OTHERSubjects who have previously undergone energy-based dermatologic procedures in the past.
Interventions
Radiofrequency Device - specific setting will be determined by the location and thickness of skin. Periorbital: 58-140 J/cm2 Midface: 81-124 J/cm2 Abdomen: 95-181 J/cm
Pulsed Dye Laser at the following settings: 7.5 J, 0.6ms, 10mm, DCD 30/20
Ultrasound Device at the following settings: Transducer Frequency Depth Image Depth DS 7-3.0 7 MHz 3.0mm 0-8mm DS 4-4.5 4 MHz 4.5mm 0-8mm DS 7-4.5 7 MHz 4.5mm 0-8mm
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects of both genders, 18 to 65 years of age.
- Subjects who are in good health.
- Non-naïve (patients who have not had cosmetic procedures using energy devices): Subjects who have had three or more non-ablative laser procedures or any skin tightening procedure using an energy device.
- Subjects who understand and are willing to provide informed consent for participation in the study and are able to communicate with the investigator.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects who have an active skin disease or skin infection in or around the treatment.
- Subjects who are unable to understand the protocol or give informed consent.
- Subjects with photophobia or who are unable to tolerate the treatments.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Northwestern University Department of Dermatology
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Murad Alam
- Organization
- Northwestern University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Murad Alam, MD
Northwestern University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of Dermatology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 27, 2011
First Posted
January 28, 2011
Study Start
February 1, 2011
Primary Completion
May 1, 2011
Study Completion
May 1, 2011
Last Updated
December 6, 2021
Results First Posted
February 5, 2014
Record last verified: 2021-12