Laparoscopic Management of Periappendicular Abscess
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
According to retrospective studies the conservative management of periappendicular abscess is associated with decreased complication and re-operation rate compared with open appendectomy. Large abscesses require percutaneous drainage. Sometimes percutaneous drainage is not possible because of anatomical position of the abscess and surgical treatment is needed. The purpose of this study is evaluate whether laparoscopic appendectomy is suitable for the first-line treatment in patients with periappendicular abscess. The hypothesis of the study is that laparoscopic management of periappendicular abscess is suitable for the first-line treatment and it does not increase time of hospitalization or complication rate compared with conservative management.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Jan 2011
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 20, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 26, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2014
CompletedSeptember 23, 2014
September 1, 2014
3.6 years
January 20, 2011
September 21, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time of hospitalization within the first 60 days after randomization
Day 60 after randomization
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Need of additional interventions
Within the first 60 days after randomization
Residual abscess
On day 7 after randomization
Attempted procedure not successfully performed
During the first 24 hours after randomization
The number of complications
Within 60 days from randomization
Number recurrent abscesses
Within 60 days after randomization
Study Arms (2)
Conservative management
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients are treated with intravenous Cefuroxime 1,5 g x 3 per day plus Metronidazole 500 mg x 3 per day. If the abscess is at least 3 cm in diameter percutaneous ultrasound guided drainage is performed.
Laparoscopic appendectomy
EXPERIMENTALLaparoscopic appendectomy and laparoscopic drainage of the abscess. If appendectomy is not possible due to technical difficulties only laparoscopic drainage is performed. Patients are treated with the same antimicrobial therapy as the control group
Interventions
Laparoscopic appendectomy and laparoscopic drainage of the abscess. If appendectomy is not possible due to technical difficulties only laparoscopic drainage is performed. Patients are treated with the same antimicrobial therapy as the control group (intravenous Cefuroxime 1,5 g x 3 per day plus Metronidazole 500 mg x 3 per day).
Patients are treated with intravenous Cefuroxime 1,5 g x 3 per day plus Metronidazole 500 mg x 3 per day. If the abscess is at least 3 cm in diameter percutaneous ultrasound guided drainage is performed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Periappendicular abscess at least 2 cm in size
You may not qualify if:
- Missing written informed consent
- Antimicrobial therapy lasted over 24 hours before randomization
- Attempt of drainage before randomization
- Age over 80 years or under 18 years old
- Pregnancy
- Allergy to either Cefuroxime or Metronidazole
- Severe chronic disease, that substantially increases the risk for operative mortality
- Previous major intra-abdominal surgery, that may have caused intra-abdominal adhesions
- Carrier of a resistant bacterial strain
- Being institutionalized or hospitalized for at least 2 weeks before randomization
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Helsinki University Central Hospital, Meilahti Hospital
Helsinki, 00029, Finland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Panu Mentula, M.D. Ph.D.
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Surgeon
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 20, 2011
First Posted
January 26, 2011
Study Start
January 1, 2011
Primary Completion
August 1, 2014
Study Completion
August 1, 2014
Last Updated
September 23, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-09