PuLsE 2-Observational Long-Term Effectiveness Follow-Up Study of PuLsE 1
PuLsE 2
A Post-Market, Open Observational Long-term Effectiveness Follow-up Study of Participants With Drug-resistant Epilepsy With Partial-onset Seizures Previously Enrolled in a Randomized Controlled Trial (E-100: PuLsE) Comparing Best Medical Practice With or w/o Adjunctive Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy
2 other identifiers
observational
81
7 countries
18
Brief Summary
This is a post-market, open observational long-term effectiveness follow-up study of participants with drug-resistant epilepsy with partial-onset seizures previously enrolled in a randomized controlled trial (PuLsE) comparing Best Medical Practice with or without adjunctive Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Mar 2011
Typical duration for all trials
18 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 19, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 21, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2014
CompletedOctober 16, 2014
October 1, 2014
2.6 years
January 19, 2011
October 14, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Exploratory evaluations
The objective of this post-market study is to perform exploratory evaluations to identify clinically and statistically significant predictors of response at all follow-up visits in participants with drug-resistant epilepsy with partial-onset seizures treated with Best Medical Practice with or without adjunctive VNS Therapy. This will be accomplished through regression modeling of the response variates (including change in baseline quality of life score and percent reduction in seizure frequency).
5 years
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change from baseline at all follow-up visits of Best Medical Practice with adjunctive VNS Therapy compared to Best Medical Practice
5 years
Change from baseline at all follow-up visits across all health outcome measurements
5 years
Evaluation of safety and tolerability
5 Years
Evaluation of change from baseline at all follow-up visits of Best Medical Practice with and without adjunctive VNS Therapy on health outcome measurements and quality of life (QOL)
5 Years
Sub-analysis to evaluate the change from baseline on quality of life
5 Years
Study Arms (2)
VNS Therapy
Best Medical Practice
Eligibility Criteria
The study population will consist of participants previously enrolled in the original PuLsE study diagnosed with drug-resistant epilepsy with partial-onset seizures. All patients will be analyzed according to the treatment that they have actually received and followed in this new study regardless of what treatment groups they were randomized in the previous study.
You may qualify if:
- To be eligible for the study, the participant must meet all the following criteria:
- Participant must have been randomized in the original PuLsE study.
- Participant must have baseline data from the original PuLsE study.
- Participant is able to give accurate seizure counts, health outcomes information, and complete study instruments with minimal assistance.
- Participant or legal guardian understands study procedures and has voluntarily signed an informed consent for PuLsE 2 in accordance with institutional and local regulatory policies.
You may not qualify if:
- The presence of any of the following will exclude a participant from the study:
- Participant has a history of non-compliance with the completion of a seizure diary.
- Participant currently uses, or is expected to use during the study, short-wave diathermy, microwave diathermy, or therapeutic ultrasound diathermy.
- Participant is expected to require full body magnetic resonance imaging during the clinical study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cyberonics, Inc.lead
Study Sites (18)
ULB Hopital Erasme
Brussels, Belgium
UZ Gent
Ghent, Belgium
QE2 Health Sciences Centre Department of Neurology
Halifax, Canada
Hopital Notre Dame
Montreal, Canada
CHU Grenoble
Grenoble, France
Hopital Roger Salengro Service de Neurologie
Lille, France
Hopital Neurologique Unite d' epileptologie
Lyon, France
Hopital Gui De Chauliac
Montpellier, France
Universitatskliniken Bonn
Bonn, Germany
Universitatsklinl Erlangen Zentrum fur Epilepsie
Erlangen, Germany
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria
Ancona, Italy
Universita di Bologna
Bologna, Italy
Universita di Pisa
Pisa, Italy
Azienda Ospedialiera "Bianchi Melacrino Morelli"
Reggio Calabria, Italy
Unisersita Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore
Rome, Italy
Centro Epilessia
Torino, Italy
Hans Berger kliniek Neurology
Oosterhout, Netherlands
The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery
London, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Philippe Ryvlin, MD
Unité d'épileptologie
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 19, 2011
First Posted
January 21, 2011
Study Start
March 1, 2011
Primary Completion
October 1, 2013
Study Completion
April 1, 2014
Last Updated
October 16, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-10