Use of High Cost Monitoring During Letrozole Ovulation Induction
2 other identifiers
interventional
21
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate monitoring methods during ovulation induction cycles with letrozole and their effect on pregnancy rates. Monitoring ovulation induction cycles with letrozole can be done with a variety of methods, the two most commonly utilized are home-based urinary LH kits (or ovulation predictor kits) and office-based midcycle follicular ultrasound. Letrozole coupled with follicular monitoring by ultrasound may add extra cost per cycle with no improvement in fecundability (pregnancy rates per cycle).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Jan 2011
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 18, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 19, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 6, 2015
CompletedJanuary 6, 2015
January 1, 2015
2.2 years
January 18, 2011
December 18, 2014
January 5, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pregnancy Success Rate
Percentage of women in each arm who became pregnant within the study time frame.
3 menstrual/treatment cycles (approximately 28-33 days each)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Time to Conception, Measured in Cycles
3 menstrual/treatment cycles, or upon conception, whichever comes first
Study Arms (2)
Urinary LH Kits
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients randomized to this arm will monitor ovulation with home-based urinary LH kits (Ovulation Predictor Kits, OPK's).
Midcycle ultrasound + hCG injection
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients randomized to this arm will undergo ovulation monitoring with midcycle ultrasound and receive hCG injection if evidence of a mature size follicle.
Interventions
Mid-cycle ultrasound with administration of hCG (single dose of standardized pre-filled injection, 250 mcg, at time of ultrasound) when appropriate.
Subjects randomized to monitoring with LH kits at home will keep a monthly calendar documenting when LH testing begins, day LH surge occurs and day(s) of intercourse/insemination.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women ages 21-39 undergoing letrozole ovulation induction (as part of routine clinical care) at a single academic-infertility center.
- Normal uterus and evidence of at least tubal patency on one side (as assessed by saline-infusion sonography or hysterosalpingogram per clinical care).
You may not qualify if:
- Current pregnancy
- Nursing mothers
- Prior hypersensitivity to hCG preparations
- Primary ovarian failure or menopausal levels of FSH (\>12 mIU/mL)
- Patients with abnormal uterine bleeding of undetermined origin or ovarian cyst of undetermined origin, sex-hormone dependent tumors, documented bilateral tubal obstruction, uncorrected uterine anomalies,
- Previous letrozole or gonadotropin use and/or previous treatment with in vitro fertilization
- Other uncorrected medical condition that would be a contraindication to attempting elective ovulation induction (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, intracranial lesion, thyroid or adrenal disease).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Center for Reproductive Medicine, University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48108, United States
Related Publications (7)
Pritts EA. Letrozole for ovulation induction and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;22(4):289-94. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32833beebf.
PMID: 20592587BACKGROUNDMitwally MF, Casper RF. Use of an aromatase inhibitor for induction of ovulation in patients with an inadequate response to clomiphene citrate. Fertil Steril. 2001 Feb;75(2):305-9. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01705-2.
PMID: 11172831BACKGROUNDMitwally MF, Abdel-Razeq S, Casper RF. Human chorionic gonadotropin administration is associated with high pregnancy rates during ovarian stimulation and timed intercourse or intrauterine insemination. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2004 Jul 7;2:55. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-2-55.
PMID: 15239837BACKGROUNDDeaton JL, Clark RR, Pittaway DE, Herbst P, Bauguess P. Clomiphene citrate ovulation induction in combination with a timed intrauterine insemination: the value of urinary luteinizing hormone versus human chorionic gonadotropin timing. Fertil Steril. 1997 Jul;68(1):43-7. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81473-2.
PMID: 9207582BACKGROUNDZreik TG, Garcia-Velasco JA, Habboosh MS, Olive DL, Arici A. Prospective, randomized, crossover study to evaluate the benefit of human chorionic gonadotropin-timed versus urinary luteinizing hormone-timed intrauterine inseminations in clomiphene citrate-stimulated treatment cycles. Fertil Steril. 1999 Jun;71(6):1070-4. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00116-8.
PMID: 10360912BACKGROUNDLewis V, Queenan J Jr, Hoeger K, Stevens J, Guzick DS. Clomiphene citrate monitoring for intrauterine insemination timing: a randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 2006 Feb;85(2):401-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.07.1331.
PMID: 16595218BACKGROUNDSmith YR, Randolph JF Jr, Christman GM, Ansbacher R, Howe DM, Hurd WW. Comparison of low-technology and high-technology monitoring of clomiphene citrate ovulation induction. Fertil Steril. 1998 Jul;70(1):165-8. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00119-8.
PMID: 9660442BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The original intent was to study 400 women, but due to recruiting and time restraints, final enrollment was only 21. Therefore, statistical analyses of the results were eliminated, as well as some additional outcome measures originally planned for.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Senait Fisseha, MD, JD
- Organization
- University of Michigan
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Senait Fisseha, MD, JD
University of Michigan
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medical Director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 18, 2011
First Posted
January 19, 2011
Study Start
January 1, 2011
Primary Completion
March 1, 2013
Study Completion
March 1, 2013
Last Updated
January 6, 2015
Results First Posted
January 6, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-01