A Study Comparing Two Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Sprays in the Relief of the Signs and Symptoms of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group, Multi-Site Study to Compare the Clinical Equivalence of Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Spray (Lek Pharmaceuticals) With Veramyst® Nasal Spray (GlaxoSmithKline) in the Relief of the Signs and Symptoms of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
1 other identifier
interventional
727
1 country
7
Brief Summary
This study compared the safety and efficacy of a generic fluticasone furoate (Lek Pharmaceuticals) nasal spray to the reference listed drug in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Additionally both the test and the reference formulations were tested for superiority against a placebo nasal spray.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Dec 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 27, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 17, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 19, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 8, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 8, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 3, 2021
CompletedFebruary 3, 2021
January 1, 2021
1 month
January 17, 2011
January 14, 2021
January 14, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
PRIMARY: Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)
Patients were required to record a 12 hour "reflective" score twice a day approximately 12 hours apart. For the rTNSS patients were asked to "look back" or "reflect" on their severity of nasal symptoms over the previous 12 hours. The first rating on each day was taken prior to dosing. Patients were asked to score 4 nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, runny nose, sneezing and itchy nose) on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). The means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the randomized treatment period were summed to give the mean rTNSS, which ranged from 0 to 12 with a lower score indicating less severe symptoms. Mean baseline rTNSS was calculated by summing the means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the 72 hours before the randomized treatment period. Mean change from baseline was calculated as "mean baseline rTNSS" - "mean post-randomization rTNSS". A positive change from baseline in rTNSS is considered a favorable outcome.
Baseline, 14 days
PRIMARY: Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)
Patients were required to record a 12 hour "reflective" score twice a day approximately 12 hours apart. For the rTNSS patients were asked to "look back" or "reflect" on their severity of nasal symptoms over the previous 12 hours. The first rating on each day was taken prior to dosing. Patients were asked to score 4 nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, runny nose, sneezing and itchy nose) on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). The means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the randomized treatment period were summed to give the mean rTNSS, which ranged from 0 to 12 with a lower score indicating less severe symptoms. Mean baseline rTNSS was calculated by summing the means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the 72 hours before the randomized treatment period. Mean change from baseline was calculated as "mean baseline rTNSS" - "mean post-randomization rTNSS". A positive change from baseline in rTNSS is considered a favorable outcome.
Baseline, 14 days
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Mean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)
Baseline, 14 days
Mean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)
Baseline, 14 days
Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)
Baseline, 14 days
Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)
Baseline, 14 days
Mean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Score (iTOSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)
Baseline, 14 days
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Test
EXPERIMENTALFluticasone furoate 27.5 mcg/actuation nasal spray (Lek Pharmaceuticals) administered once daily at a dose of 110 mcg (4 actuations) for 14 days.
Reference
ACTIVE COMPARATORFluticasone furoate (Veramyst®) 27.5 mcg/actuation nasal spray administered once daily at a dose of 110 mcg (4 actuations) for 14 days.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo nasal spray administered once daily for 14 days.
Interventions
Nasal spray administered once daily at a dose of 110 mcg (4 actuations) for 14 days.
Nasal spray administered once daily at a dose of 110 mcg (4 actuations) for 14 days.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or non-pregnant, non-lactating female 12 years of age or older with a minimum of 2 years of previous history of seasonal allergic rhinitis to the pollen/allergen in season at the time the study is being conducted.
- Signed informed consent (assent) form.
- Documented positive allergic skin test to local pollen.
- An average score of at least 6 on the reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) with a minimum score of at least 2 for "nasal congestion" and at least 4 on the reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS).
You may not qualify if:
- History of asthma that required chronic therapy (with the exception of occasional acute or mild exercise induced asthma).
- Some other past and concomitant medical conditions, prohibited medications.
- Upper respiratory tract infection or any untreated infections.
- Patient has started immunotherapy/changed the dose.
- Any known allergy to any of the components of the study nasal spray.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sandozlead
Study Sites (7)
Sandoz Investigational Site
Austin, Texas, 78731, United States
Sandoz Investigational Site
Austin, Texas, 78750, United States
Sandoz Investigational Site
Austin, Texas, 78759, United States
Sandoz Investigational Site
Kerrville, Texas, 78028, United States
Sandoz Investigational Site
New Braunfels, Texas, 78130, United States
Sandoz Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
Sandoz Investigational Site
Waco, Texas, 76712, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 17, 2011
First Posted
January 19, 2011
Study Start
December 27, 2010
Primary Completion
February 8, 2011
Study Completion
February 8, 2011
Last Updated
February 3, 2021
Results First Posted
February 3, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01