NCT01279057

Brief Summary

This study compared the safety and efficacy of a generic fluticasone furoate (Lek Pharmaceuticals) nasal spray to the reference listed drug in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Additionally both the test and the reference formulations were tested for superiority against a placebo nasal spray.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
727

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2010

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

7 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 27, 2010

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 17, 2011

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 19, 2011

Completed
20 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 8, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 8, 2011

Completed
10 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 3, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

February 3, 2021

Status Verified

January 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

January 17, 2011

Results QC Date

January 14, 2021

Last Update Submit

January 14, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

RhinitisSeasonal Allergic RhinitisFluticasone furoateEquivalenceHay fever

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • PRIMARY: Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)

    Patients were required to record a 12 hour "reflective" score twice a day approximately 12 hours apart. For the rTNSS patients were asked to "look back" or "reflect" on their severity of nasal symptoms over the previous 12 hours. The first rating on each day was taken prior to dosing. Patients were asked to score 4 nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, runny nose, sneezing and itchy nose) on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). The means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the randomized treatment period were summed to give the mean rTNSS, which ranged from 0 to 12 with a lower score indicating less severe symptoms. Mean baseline rTNSS was calculated by summing the means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the 72 hours before the randomized treatment period. Mean change from baseline was calculated as "mean baseline rTNSS" - "mean post-randomization rTNSS". A positive change from baseline in rTNSS is considered a favorable outcome.

    Baseline, 14 days

  • PRIMARY: Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)

    Patients were required to record a 12 hour "reflective" score twice a day approximately 12 hours apart. For the rTNSS patients were asked to "look back" or "reflect" on their severity of nasal symptoms over the previous 12 hours. The first rating on each day was taken prior to dosing. Patients were asked to score 4 nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, runny nose, sneezing and itchy nose) on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). The means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the randomized treatment period were summed to give the mean rTNSS, which ranged from 0 to 12 with a lower score indicating less severe symptoms. Mean baseline rTNSS was calculated by summing the means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the 72 hours before the randomized treatment period. Mean change from baseline was calculated as "mean baseline rTNSS" - "mean post-randomization rTNSS". A positive change from baseline in rTNSS is considered a favorable outcome.

    Baseline, 14 days

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Mean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)

    Baseline, 14 days

  • Mean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)

    Baseline, 14 days

  • Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)

    Baseline, 14 days

  • Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)

    Baseline, 14 days

  • Mean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Score (iTOSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)

    Baseline, 14 days

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Test

EXPERIMENTAL

Fluticasone furoate 27.5 mcg/actuation nasal spray (Lek Pharmaceuticals) administered once daily at a dose of 110 mcg (4 actuations) for 14 days.

Drug: Fluticasone furoate 27.5 mcg/actuation nasal spray (Lek Pharmaceuticals)

Reference

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Fluticasone furoate (Veramyst®) 27.5 mcg/actuation nasal spray administered once daily at a dose of 110 mcg (4 actuations) for 14 days.

Drug: Fluticasone furoate (Veramyst®) 27.5 mcg/actuation nasal spray

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Placebo nasal spray administered once daily for 14 days.

Drug: Placebo

Interventions

Nasal spray administered once daily at a dose of 110 mcg (4 actuations) for 14 days.

Test

Nasal spray administered once daily at a dose of 110 mcg (4 actuations) for 14 days.

Reference

Placebo nasal spray administered once daily (4 actuations) for 14 days.

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age12 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or non-pregnant, non-lactating female 12 years of age or older with a minimum of 2 years of previous history of seasonal allergic rhinitis to the pollen/allergen in season at the time the study is being conducted.
  • Signed informed consent (assent) form.
  • Documented positive allergic skin test to local pollen.
  • An average score of at least 6 on the reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) with a minimum score of at least 2 for "nasal congestion" and at least 4 on the reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS).

You may not qualify if:

  • History of asthma that required chronic therapy (with the exception of occasional acute or mild exercise induced asthma).
  • Some other past and concomitant medical conditions, prohibited medications.
  • Upper respiratory tract infection or any untreated infections.
  • Patient has started immunotherapy/changed the dose.
  • Any known allergy to any of the components of the study nasal spray.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (7)

Sandoz Investigational Site

Austin, Texas, 78731, United States

Location

Sandoz Investigational Site

Austin, Texas, 78750, United States

Location

Sandoz Investigational Site

Austin, Texas, 78759, United States

Location

Sandoz Investigational Site

Kerrville, Texas, 78028, United States

Location

Sandoz Investigational Site

New Braunfels, Texas, 78130, United States

Location

Sandoz Investigational Site

San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States

Location

Sandoz Investigational Site

Waco, Texas, 76712, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rhinitis, Allergic, SeasonalRhinitis

Interventions

fluticasone furoateFluticasone

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Rhinitis, AllergicNose DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesRespiratory HypersensitivityOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesHypersensitivity, ImmediateHypersensitivityImmune System DiseasesRespiratory Tract InfectionsInfections

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AndrostadienesAndrostenesAndrostanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic Compounds

Results Point of Contact

Title
Study Director
Organization
Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2011

First Posted

January 19, 2011

Study Start

December 27, 2010

Primary Completion

February 8, 2011

Study Completion

February 8, 2011

Last Updated

February 3, 2021

Results First Posted

February 3, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-01

Locations