The Effect of Pressure Controlled Ventilation on the Pulmonary Mechanics in Prone Position Using the Wilson Frame: A Comparison With Volume Controlled Ventilation
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Prone position in spinal surgery can increase airway pressure and decrease dynamic lung compliance by a frame used for postural stabilization. Also, it can increase hemodynamic instability such as reduced blood pressure by aggravating cardiac index. Former study shows pressure controlled ventilation on the pulmonary mechanics can improve alveolar use and oxygenation than volume controlled ventilation. The latter one means controlling a patient's breathing completely through tidal volume and set breathing rate. This could be useful for the patients not possible to breath by themselves because it guarantees the perfect breathing. The pressure controlled ventilation is used when there is a possibility to change a patient's environment. The pressure will be maintained steadily, but volume and flux will be changed. That means through the pressure already set, the whole breathing will be maintained from the beginning to end. If a patient's resistance is increased, the volume will be decreased even though the way of blood pressure control is same. However, the tidal volume per minute can be controlled somewhat and barotrauma can be decreased by controlling respiratory rate. Through this study, we are expecting the pressure controlled ventilation in prone position can improve lung mechanics and oxygenation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2010
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 7, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 10, 2011
CompletedFebruary 3, 2012
February 1, 2012
5 months
January 7, 2011
February 2, 2012
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
peak airway pressure
Record peak airway pressure on anesthesia mechanical ventilator after anesthesia induction and 30 minutes after prone positioning.
30 minutes after prone position
Study Arms (2)
PCV
EXPERIMENTALPeak airway pressure were set to deliver a tidal volume of 10 ml/kg of ideal body weight
VCV
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter anesthetic induction, anesthesia maching were set to deliver a tidal volume of 10 ml/kg of ideal body weight
Interventions
Pressure controlled ventilation for peak airway pressure to deliver tidal volume 10 ml/kg.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- scheduled for lumbar spine surgery under general anaesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with coronary artery occlusive disease
- morbid obesity (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2)
- cerebrovascular disease and major obstructive or restrictive pulmonary disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Severance Hospital
Seoul, 120-752, South Korea
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 7, 2011
First Posted
January 10, 2011
Study Start
August 1, 2010
Primary Completion
January 1, 2011
Study Completion
January 1, 2011
Last Updated
February 3, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-02