Study Stopped
lack of sufficient enrollment
High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Bubble Nasal CPAP for the Treatment of Transient Tachypnea of the Newborn in Infants ≥ 35 Weeks Gestation
High Flow Nasal Cannula vs Bubble Nasal CPAP for the Treatment of Transient Tachypnea of the Newborn in Infants ≥ 35 Weeks Gestation
1 other identifier
interventional
7
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary objective is to determine whether High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) is a superior respiratory modality for neonates ≥36 weeks with transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN) when compared to the standard of care modality (NCPAP).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2010
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 21, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 5, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 16, 2017
CompletedFebruary 16, 2017
December 1, 2016
1.8 years
December 21, 2010
December 4, 2015
December 23, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Duration of Respiratory Support
Data not collected due to insufficient enrollment for any data analysis.
average of 7 days
Study Arms (2)
High Flow Nasal Cannula
EXPERIMENTALUnlike the nasal prongs for NCPAP (which fit tightly in the nares), the nasal cannula for HFNC have smaller, loose-fitting prong. With HFNC, positive airway pressure is achieved by high gas flow through the cannula into the external nares which provide resistance to expiration and facilitate inspiration. The distending pressure is determined by the size and structure of the nasal cannula, gas flow rate, and the neonate's airway anatomy 4,5,7. Newborns randomized to HFNC will be started on a flow rate of 4L/min and supplemental oxygen will be provided to maintain oxygen saturations between 88-93% (experimental group). Once initiated, the gas flow rate will be titrated as needed by the attending neonatologist to ameliorate signs of respiratory distress to a maximum flow rate of 6L/min. The nasal cannula size (0.2 cm or 0.3 mm outer diameter) will determined by the caliber of the subject's nares).
Control Group- Bubble Nasal CPAP
ACTIVE COMPARATORNCPAP provides continuous distending airway pressure during inspiration and expiration via nasal prongs; this has been shown to increase lung volume by increasing alveolar size, recruiting collapsed alveoli, and preventing atelectasis. Improved lung volumes decrease V/Q mismatch and improve the clinical course of neonates with RDS, and as such, early NCPAP use often avoids the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation. Newborns receiving bubble NCPAP will be placed on a PEEP 5cm H2O, and supplemental oxygen will be provided to maintain oxygen saturation between 88-93% (standard of care group) as is standard practice. The size of the nasal prongs used will be based on the subject's weight as per the manufacturer instructions.
Interventions
Humidified high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has emerged as an alternative respiratory modality for late preterm newborns with respiratory distress. Like NCPAP, oxygen is delivered to the infant via nasal prongs and provides a continuous distending pressure. Unlike the nasal prongs for NCPAP (which fit tightly in the nares), the nasal cannula for HFNC have smaller, loose-fitting prong. With HFNC, positive airway pressure is achieved by high gas flow through the cannula into the external nares which provide resistance to expiration and facilitate inspiration. The distending pressure is determined by the size and structure of the nasal cannula, gas flow rate, and the neonate's airway anatomy 4,5,7.
NCPAP provides continuous distending airway pressure during inspiration and expiration via nasal prongs; this has been shown to increase lung volume by increasing alveolar size, recruiting collapsed alveoli, and preventing atelectasis. Improved lung volumes decrease V/Q mismatch and improve the clinical course of neonates with RDS, and as such, early NCPAP use often avoids the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation. Newborns receiving bubble NCPAP will be placed on a PEEP 5cm H2O, and supplemental oxygen will be provided to maintain oxygen saturation between 88-93% (standard of care group) as is standard practice. The size of the nasal prongs used will be based on the subject's weight as per the manufacturer instructions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- gestational age ≥ 35 weeks
- diagnosis of TTN, defined as respiratory rate \>60, presence of subcostal and /or intercostal retractions, nasal flaring, grunting, oxygen saturations 70-93% on room air, and radiological evidence of perihilar streaking and patchy infiltrates
- admission to the NICU at Mount Sinai hospital within first 24 hours of life
You may not qualify if:
- gestational age \< 35 weeks
- history of thick meconium stained fluid and/or diagnosis of meconium aspiration syndrome
- diagnosis of major congenital pulmonary or cardiac anomalies
- initial CXR demonstrating air leak
- respiratory distress first occurring after 24 hours of life
- presumptive diagnosis of RDS as indicated by the need for FiO2 \> 40%, severe retractions and grunting with poor air entry, and diffuse alveolar consolidation on chest radiograph
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
New York, New York, 10029, United States
Related Publications (6)
Dani C, Pratesi S, Migliori C, Bertini G. High flow nasal cannula therapy as respiratory support in the preterm infant. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2009 Jul;44(7):629-34. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21051.
PMID: 19499590BACKGROUNDJasin LR, Kern S, Thompson S, Walter C, Rone JM, Yohannan MD. Subcutaneous scalp emphysema, pneumo-orbitis and pneumocephalus in a neonate on high humidity high flow nasal cannula. J Perinatol. 2008 Nov;28(11):779-81. doi: 10.1038/jp.2008.99.
PMID: 18974751BACKGROUNDLampland AL, Plumm B, Meyers PA, Worwa CT, Mammel MC. Observational study of humidified high-flow nasal cannula compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure. J Pediatr. 2009 Feb;154(2):177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.07.021. Epub 2008 Aug 30.
PMID: 18760803BACKGROUNDLocke RG, Wolfson MR, Shaffer TH, Rubenstein SD, Greenspan JS. Inadvertent administration of positive end-distending pressure during nasal cannula flow. Pediatrics. 1993 Jan;91(1):135-8.
PMID: 8416477BACKGROUNDShoemaker MT, Pierce MR, Yoder BA, DiGeronimo RJ. High flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for neonatal respiratory disease: a retrospective study. J Perinatol. 2007 Feb;27(2):85-91. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211647.
PMID: 17262040BACKGROUNDSreenan C, Lemke RP, Hudson-Mason A, Osiovich H. High-flow nasal cannulae in the management of apnea of prematurity: a comparison with conventional nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Pediatrics. 2001 May;107(5):1081-3. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.5.1081.
PMID: 11331690BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
low enrollment, data not analyzed - too small for any meaningful interpretation
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Andrea Weintraub
- Organization
- Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrea Weintraub, MD
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 21, 2010
First Posted
January 5, 2011
Study Start
July 1, 2010
Primary Completion
April 1, 2012
Study Completion
April 1, 2012
Last Updated
February 16, 2017
Results First Posted
February 16, 2017
Record last verified: 2016-12