Culotte Technique Versus TAP Stunting for the Treatment of de Novo Coronary Bifurcation Lesion With Drug-eluting Stents
BBK2
Randomised Comparison of T-stenting Versus Culotte Technique for the Treatment of de Novo Coronary Bifurcation Lesion With Drug-eluting Stents.
1 other identifier
interventional
300
1 country
1
Brief Summary
BBK- 2 - study: STUDY-SUMMARY Background: The need for stenting of the main and side branch (double stenting) in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesion primarily depends on the complexity of the bifurcation lesion. If the bifurcation lesion is very complex (Medina classification 111, severe stenosis of both branches, severe calcified lesion, long lesions etc.) double stenting may be the treatment of choice. When double stenting is required, the most frequently used stenting techniques are T-stenting and Culotte-stenting. It is still unclear, however, which double stent technique yields the best long-term outcome. Aim: This randomized study will compare the long-term safety and efficacy of T-stenting versus Culotte-stenting in the treatment of de-novo coronary bifurcation lesions with drug-eluting stents. Methods: Three-hundred patients in whom a double-stenting technique is intended for the treatment of a de-novo coronary bifurcation lesion will be randomly assigned to T-stenting or Culotte-stenting with an approved drug-eluting stent. Patients will undergo 9-month angiographic follow-up with quantitative coronary angiography. Clinical follow-up is planed at 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years and 5 years. The primary study endpoint is the maximal percent diameter stenosis in the bifurcation lesion at 9 months. Secondary endpoints include binary restenosis (estimated by Quantitative Coronary Angiography (QCA) analysis), Target Lesion Revascularisation (TLR), Freedom from Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) and the rate of stent thrombosis according to the definition of the Academic Research Consortium (ARC definition). The study will have 90% power to detect a 25% reduction in the primary endpoint at p \< 0.05.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 coronary-artery-disease
Started Feb 2010
Longer than P75 for phase_4 coronary-artery-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 28, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 29, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2016
CompletedSeptember 7, 2016
September 1, 2016
5 years
December 28, 2010
September 4, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Maximal percent diameter stenosis at the bifurcation (QCA)
Maximal percent diameter stenosis at the bifurcation (QCA)
9 months post index PCI
Secondary Outcomes (1)
TLR of the main and side branch
12 months post index PCI
Study Arms (2)
T Stenting group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPCI of bifurcation lesion with modified T Stenting.
Culotte stenting group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPCI of bifurcation lesion with Culotte stenting
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical indication for interventional treatment of the bifurcation lesion.
- There is indication to perform the double stenting as judged by the operator.
- Bifurcation lesions according to the Medina classification of a native coronary artery with a reference vessel diameter: main branch \>2,5 mm; side branch \>2,25 mm (the difference between vessel diameter of the main and side branch should be ≤1 mm)
- The target lesion (main branch and / or side branch) must be at least 50% diameter stenosis.
- The target lesion has not been previously treated with any interventional procedure.
- The target vessel (main branch and side branch) must be feasible for stent implantation (successful passage with the guide wire; successful predilataion with an appropriately sized balloon; no heavy calcification; no diffuse distal disease that might impede run off).
- Patient has no other treatment planned within 30 days of the procedure.
- Patient has been informed of the nature of the study and agrees to its provisions and has written informed consent as approved by the Ethics Committee.
- Patient is willing to comply all required post-procedure follow-up.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient had an acute myocardial infarction (\> 3x normal CK ) within 72 hours preceding the index procedure and CK has not returned to normal limits at the time of the procedure.
- Patient will have a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin, clopidogrel, prasugrel, stainless steel, sirolimus, everolimus, zotarolimus, biolimus or contrast sensitivity that cannot be adequately pre- medicated.
- Non successful treatment of other lesion during the same procedure
- Patient has a platelet count of \<100,000 cells/mm³ or \>700,000 cells/mm³, a White Blood Cells of \<3,000 cells/mm³, or documented or liver disease.
- Patient has a history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy.
- Patient has suffered a stroke within the past six months.
- Active peptic ulcer or upper gastrointestinal bleeding within the prior 6 months.
- Patient has a co-morbidity (i.e. cancer or congestive heart failure) that may cause the patient to be non-compliant with the protocol, or is associated with limited life- expectancy (less than 2 years).
- Indication for oral anticoagulation
- Patient must be excluded from the study if any of these angiographic criteria are met:
- The target vessel contains intraluminal thrombus.
- The target lesion or vessel shows angiographic evidence of severe calcification.
- The patient has undergone previous PCI to the target vessel within 6 months.
- Pre treatment of the lesion is done with a technique other than balloon angioplasty.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Herz-Zentrum Bad Krozingen
Bad Krozingen, Suedring 15, 79189, Germany
Related Publications (4)
Ferenc M, Gick M, Kienzle RP, Bestehorn HP, Werner KD, Comberg T, Kuebler P, Buttner HJ, Neumann FJ. Randomized trial on routine vs. provisional T-stenting in the treatment of de novo coronary bifurcation lesions. Eur Heart J. 2008 Dec;29(23):2859-67. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn455. Epub 2008 Oct 9.
PMID: 18845665BACKGROUNDAdriaenssens T, Byrne RA, Dibra A, Iijima R, Mehilli J, Bruskina O, Schomig A, Kastrati A. Culotte stenting technique in coronary bifurcation disease: angiographic follow-up using dedicated quantitative coronary angiographic analysis and 12-month clinical outcomes. Eur Heart J. 2008 Dec;29(23):2868-76. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn512. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
PMID: 19001472BACKGROUNDErglis A, Kumsars I, Niemela M, Kervinen K, Maeng M, Lassen JF, Gunnes P, Stavnes S, Jensen JS, Galloe A, Narbute I, Sondore D, Makikallio T, Ylitalo K, Christiansen EH, Ravkilde J, Steigen TK, Mannsverk J, Thayssen P, Hansen KN, Syvanne M, Helqvist S, Kjell N, Wiseth R, Aaroe J, Puhakka M, Thuesen L; Nordic PCI Study Group. Randomized comparison of coronary bifurcation stenting with the crush versus the culotte technique using sirolimus eluting stents: the Nordic stent technique study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Feb;2(1):27-34. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.804658. Epub 2009 Feb 10.
PMID: 20031690BACKGROUNDHildick-Smith D, de Belder AJ, Cooter N, Curzen NP, Clayton TC, Oldroyd KG, Bennett L, Holmberg S, Cotton JM, Glennon PE, Thomas MR, Maccarthy PA, Baumbach A, Mulvihill NT, Henderson RA, Redwood SR, Starkey IR, Stables RH. Randomized trial of simple versus complex drug-eluting stenting for bifurcation lesions: the British Bifurcation Coronary Study: old, new, and evolving strategies. Circulation. 2010 Mar 16;121(10):1235-43. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.888297. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
PMID: 20194880BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Miroslaw Ferenc, MD
Herz-Zentrum Bad Krozingen
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 28, 2010
First Posted
December 29, 2010
Study Start
February 1, 2010
Primary Completion
February 1, 2015
Study Completion
April 1, 2016
Last Updated
September 7, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share