NCT01264419

Brief Summary

Cerebral embolization during carotid artery stenting (CAS) can often precipitate severe adverse neurological effects. Most major clinical studies of CAS have used distal filters for cerebral protection and have compared the neurologic complication rates with those of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Many currently available embolic protection devices, however, have limited efficacy in capturing microembolic debris that is liberated during stenting, pre-dilatation and post-dilatation. Distal protection systems are furthermore limited by the need to cross the lesion prior to deployment. Some studies have shown a relatively high incidence of cerebral infarction even when distal protection devices are employed. Cerebral protection with carotid flow reversal is a method that was developed by Parodi, et al., as an alternative to the use of distal protection devices. While novel in its approach, this method too has its limitations. Criado, et al., developed a derivative technique that employs carotid flow reversal prior to traversing the stenosis and can be accomplished by directly accessing carotid anatomy without the use of the transfemoral approach. Major benefits to this method include the ability to perform the procedure on patients with severe carotid tortuosity and difficult aortic arch anatomy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
75

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2009

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2009

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 17, 2010

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 21, 2010

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2012

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2012

Completed
7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 8, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

February 17, 2020

Status Verified

January 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

December 17, 2010

Results QC Date

January 7, 2019

Last Update Submit

January 30, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Safety Evaluation as Composite of Occurrences of Major Stroke, Myocardial Infarction and Death

    Safety will be evaluated as a composite of major stroke, myocardial infarction and death during the 30-day post procedural period.

    0 days post-procedure to 30 days post-procedure

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Participants Demonstrating Acute Device Success, Procedural Success, and Tolerance to Reverse Flow

    peri-operative to 30 days post-procedure

Study Arms (1)

Silk Road Embolic Protection System

EXPERIMENTAL

Eligible subjects who are to receive a carotid artery stent, via transcervical access using reverse flow cerebral protection, as treatment for high-grade extracranial carotid artery disease

Device: Silk Road Embolic Protection System

Interventions

System that delivers a carotid artery stent, via transcervical access using reverse flow cerebral protection, as treatment for high-grade extracranial carotid artery disease

Silk Road Embolic Protection System

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subject must be \> 21 years of age.
  • Subject has the ability to understand and cooperate with study procedures and agrees to return for all required follow-up visits, tests and exams.
  • Subjects taking warfarin may be included if their dosage is reduced before the procedure to result in an International Normalized Ratio (INR) of 1.5 or less. Warfarin may be restarted to therapeutic dose after the procedure.
  • The subject must sign a written informed consent prior to the procedure, using a form that is approved by the local medical ethics committee (EC).
  • The life expectancy of the subject is at least one year.
  • The subject has a lesion located in the internal carotid artery (ICA); the carotid bifurcation may be involved.
  • The subject must have a minimum distance of 5 cm between the clavicle and bifurcation, as assessed by duplex Doppler ultrasound, computed axial tomographic (CT) angiography or magnetic resonance (MR) angiography.

You may not qualify if:

  • The subject was participating in another investigational trial that would interfere with the conduct or result of this study.
  • The subject had dementia or a neurological illness that may confound the neurological evaluation.
  • Presence of any one of the following anatomic risk factors:
  • Previous radiation treatment to the neck or radical neck dissection
  • Tracheostomy or tracheal stoma
  • Laryngectomy
  • Contralateral laryngeal nerve palsy
  • Severe tandem lesions
  • Inability to extend the head due to cervical arthritis or other cervical disorders
  • A total occlusion of the target vessel.
  • There was an existing, previously placed stent in the target artery.
  • The subject had a known life-threatening allergy to the contrast media that cannot be treated.
  • Subject had history of intolerance or allergic reaction to any of the study medications including aspirin, Clopidogrel bisulfate (Plavix®) or Ticlopidine (Ticlid®), heparin or Bivalrudin (Angiomax™). Subject was unable to tolerate a combination of aspirin and Clopidogrel/Ticlopidine.
  • The subject had a GI bleed that would interfere with antiplatelet therapy.
  • The subject had known cardiac source of potential emboli.
  • +15 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Augusta-Krankenhaus

Düsseldorf, 40472, Germany

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Pinter L, Ribo M, Loh C, Lane B, Roberts T, Chou TM, Kolvenbach RR. Safety and feasibility of a novel transcervical access neuroprotection system for carotid artery stenting in the PROOF Study. J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1317-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.04.040. Epub 2011 Jun 12.

    PMID: 21658889BACKGROUND
  • Alpaslan A, Wintermark M, Pinter L, Macdonald S, Ruedy R, Kolvenbach R. Transcarotid Artery Revascularization With Flow Reversal. J Endovasc Ther. 2017 Apr;24(2):265-270. doi: 10.1177/1526602817693607. Epub 2017 Feb 17.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carotid Artery Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Richard Ruedy, Exec VP Clinical Affairs
Organization
Silk Road Medical, Inc.

Study Officials

  • Sumaira Macdonald, MD, PhD

    Chief Medical Officer

    STUDY CHAIR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2010

First Posted

December 21, 2010

Study Start

March 1, 2009

Primary Completion

June 1, 2012

Study Completion

July 1, 2012

Last Updated

February 17, 2020

Results First Posted

July 8, 2019

Record last verified: 2020-01

Locations