Comparing Urinary Tract Infections in Children With Spina Bifida Using Two Types of Catheters for Catheterization
A Comparison of the Incidence of Symptomatic Urinary Tract Infections in Children With Spina Bifida Using Hydrophilic or Non-hydrophilic Polyvinyl Chloride Catheters for Clean Intermittent Catheterization: a Randomized Cross Over Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
46
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The primary aim of this study was to determine if using the SpeediCath hydrophilic catheter would reduce the incidence of symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTI)in children with spina bifida who perform clean intermittent catheterization for bladder management. The hypothesis was that the incidence of symptomatic urinary tract infections would be significantly reduced (by 25%) in users of the SpeediCath hydrophilic catheter when compared to users of a reused polyvinyl chloride (PVC) catheter. Subjects were randomly assigned to either starting the study with PVC catheter for 6 months followed by the hydrophilic catheter for 6 months or visa versa. Each subject kept a weekly diary recording urinary tract infections symptoms, hematuria determined by urine dipstick, physician visits, days of missed school and other activities. At the end of each 6 months subjects completed a questionnaire recording their comfort and satisfaction in using the PVC or hydrophilic coated catheter. 70 subjects were randomized and 46 had complete data. There were no differences in febrile UTI, antibiotic use, healthcare visits or school days missed. The incidence of self reported UTI was lower in the PVC group than the hydrophilic group. 40% of subjects indicated that the hydrophilic coated catheter was slippery and difficult to handle compared to 10% for the PVC catheter. However overall satisfaction was no different between products. The study results are consistent with the current Cochrane Review that there is a lack of evidence to state that the incidence of UTI is affected by multiuse or hydrophilic catheter use.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2007
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 16, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 20, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2013
CompletedJune 20, 2013
March 1, 2013
5.8 years
December 16, 2010
June 19, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI)
Symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) as per CDC definitions
6 months and 6 months at crossover
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Subject satisfaction
6 months and 6 months at cross over
Other Outcomes (4)
urinalysis (urine dipstick)
6 months and 6 months at crossover points
Antibiotic use for any reason
6 months and 6 months at cross over points
Physician or healthcare provider visits
6 months and 6 months at crossover points
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Polyvinyl Chloride Catheter
ACTIVE COMPARATORRe-use clean polyvinyl chloride catheters for intermittent catheterization of children with spina bifida.
Hydrophilic catheter
ACTIVE COMPARATORUse hydrophilic catheters (Speedicath) for intermittent catheterization of children with spina bifida.
Interventions
Subjects will use each type of catheter for 6 months and will report weekly in a diary on urinary tract infections (UTIs), urine dip for haematuria \& leukocytes, antibiotic use, and days missed school; and will answer a Satisfaction questionnaire at the end of each 6 month arm.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy Child with spina bifida who requires clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) for ongoing bladder management.
- Child either self catheterizes or receives catheterization by a consistent person.
- Child/parent/caregiver able to read and understand English in order to consent to participation in the study and to respond to verbal questions about the experience and satisfaction with the catheter.
You may not qualify if:
- Urethral deformities (i.e. stricture, false passage)
- Antibiotic prophylaxis
- Allergy to PVC product
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Unwilling to reuse catheters
- History of bladder pathology (ie. tumours, calculus)
- Surgical history of augmentation (cystoplasty, continent diversion)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Alberta Children's Hospital
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2G3, Canada
BC Children's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Winnipeg Children's Hospital
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Katherine N Moore, PhD
University of Alberta
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 16, 2010
First Posted
December 20, 2010
Study Start
April 1, 2007
Primary Completion
January 1, 2013
Study Completion
January 1, 2013
Last Updated
June 20, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-03