Labour Augmentation by Means of Oxytocin - Obstetric Outcome and Women's Experiences
1 other identifier
interventional
2,072
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Slow labour progress is common in nulliparous women and is associated with childbirth complications and negative birth experiences. Oxytocin augmentation is widely used to treat slow labour despite associated risks for the fetus. An ongoing debate concerns whether oxytocin should be administered directly or postponed after arrested labour. The overall aim is to study labour progress in healthy nulliparous women and to compare childbirth outcomes and experiences in women randomised to expectant versus early oxytocin augmentation for slow labour progress. The hypothesis is that it is to early to start oxytocin treatment when labour progress has been slow for 2 to 3 hours in healthy women having their first baby and therefore beneficial for childbirth outcomes to postpone oxytocin for another 3 hours. In this randomised controlled trial nulliparous women with a normal pregnancy, spontaneous onset of active labor at term, and a cervical dilatation of 4 - 9 centimetres on admission to the delivery ward were included (n=2,072). All women whose labour did not progress after amniotomy (n=630) were randomly allocated either to labour augmentation by oxytocin infusion (Early oxytocin, n=314) or to postponement of oxytocin augmentation for another three hours (Expectant, n=316). One month postpartum the women received a postal questionnaire concerning their experiences of labour and birth. All participating women gave their informed consent. Maternal and neonatal outcomes like mode of delivery, postpartum haemorrhage, perinatal lacerations, low Apgar score, need of neonatal intensive care and maternal experiences of childbirth were compared between the randomised groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 1998
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 1998
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2003
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 17, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 20, 2010
CompletedAugust 11, 2015
August 1, 2015
December 17, 2010
August 10, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mode of delivery (spontaneous vaginal, instrumental vaginal or caesarean delivery)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Postpartum haemorrhage
Sphincter lacerations
Need of neonatal intensive care
Maternal experiences of childbirth
Study Arms (2)
Expectant group
EXPERIMENTALArrest in labour progress for 2-3 hours and no progress after amniotomy. Expectancy of standard oxytocin treatment for 3 hours.
Early oxytocin group
NO INTERVENTIONArrest in labour progress for 2-3 hours and no progress after amniotomy. Oxytocin treatment started within 20 minutes.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Nulliparity Normal pregnancy 37+0 - 41+6 weeks Single foetus Cephalic presentation Spontaneous onset of active labour Informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Prelabour rupture of membranes Serious maternal disease Fetal intrauterine death
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Göteborg Universitylead
- Sahlgrenska University Hospitalcollaborator
- Ryhov County Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Institute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg
Gothenburg, 40530, Sweden
Related Publications (4)
Dencker A, Berg M, Bergqvist L, Ladfors L, Thorsen LS, Lilja H. Early versus delayed oxytocin augmentation in nulliparous women with prolonged labour--a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2009 Mar;116(4):530-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01962.x.
PMID: 19250364RESULTDencker A, Berg M, Bergqvist L, Lilja H. Identification of latent phase factors associated with active labor duration in low-risk nulliparous women with spontaneous contractions. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010 Aug;89(8):1034-9. doi: 10.3109/00016349.2010.499446.
PMID: 20636242RESULTDencker A, Taft C, Bergqvist L, Lilja H, Berg M. Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Dec 10;10:81. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-81.
PMID: 21143961RESULTBergqvist L, Dencker A, Taft C, Lilja H, Ladfors L, Skaring-Thorsen L, Berg M. Women's experiences after early versus postponed oxytocin treatment of slow progress in first childbirth--a randomized controlled trial. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2012 Jun;3(2):61-5. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 Mar 24.
PMID: 22578752RESULT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 17, 2010
First Posted
December 20, 2010
Study Start
October 1, 1998
Study Completion
December 1, 2003
Last Updated
August 11, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-08