NCT01263158

Brief Summary

Slow labour progress is common in nulliparous women and is associated with childbirth complications and negative birth experiences. Oxytocin augmentation is widely used to treat slow labour despite associated risks for the fetus. An ongoing debate concerns whether oxytocin should be administered directly or postponed after arrested labour. The overall aim is to study labour progress in healthy nulliparous women and to compare childbirth outcomes and experiences in women randomised to expectant versus early oxytocin augmentation for slow labour progress. The hypothesis is that it is to early to start oxytocin treatment when labour progress has been slow for 2 to 3 hours in healthy women having their first baby and therefore beneficial for childbirth outcomes to postpone oxytocin for another 3 hours. In this randomised controlled trial nulliparous women with a normal pregnancy, spontaneous onset of active labor at term, and a cervical dilatation of 4 - 9 centimetres on admission to the delivery ward were included (n=2,072). All women whose labour did not progress after amniotomy (n=630) were randomly allocated either to labour augmentation by oxytocin infusion (Early oxytocin, n=314) or to postponement of oxytocin augmentation for another three hours (Expectant, n=316). One month postpartum the women received a postal questionnaire concerning their experiences of labour and birth. All participating women gave their informed consent. Maternal and neonatal outcomes like mode of delivery, postpartum haemorrhage, perinatal lacerations, low Apgar score, need of neonatal intensive care and maternal experiences of childbirth were compared between the randomised groups.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
2,072

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 1998

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 1998

Completed
5.2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2003

Completed
7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 17, 2010

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 20, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

August 11, 2015

Status Verified

August 1, 2015

First QC Date

December 17, 2010

Last Update Submit

August 10, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

randomised controlled trialnulliparous womenslow labour progressprolonged labouroxytocin augmentationoperative deliverychildbirth experience

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Mode of delivery (spontaneous vaginal, instrumental vaginal or caesarean delivery)

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Postpartum haemorrhage

  • Sphincter lacerations

  • Need of neonatal intensive care

  • Maternal experiences of childbirth

Study Arms (2)

Expectant group

EXPERIMENTAL

Arrest in labour progress for 2-3 hours and no progress after amniotomy. Expectancy of standard oxytocin treatment for 3 hours.

Other: Expectancy of standard oxytocin treatment

Early oxytocin group

NO INTERVENTION

Arrest in labour progress for 2-3 hours and no progress after amniotomy. Oxytocin treatment started within 20 minutes.

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 48 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Nulliparity Normal pregnancy 37+0 - 41+6 weeks Single foetus Cephalic presentation Spontaneous onset of active labour Informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Prelabour rupture of membranes Serious maternal disease Fetal intrauterine death

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Institute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg

Gothenburg, 40530, Sweden

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Dencker A, Berg M, Bergqvist L, Ladfors L, Thorsen LS, Lilja H. Early versus delayed oxytocin augmentation in nulliparous women with prolonged labour--a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2009 Mar;116(4):530-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01962.x.

  • Dencker A, Berg M, Bergqvist L, Lilja H. Identification of latent phase factors associated with active labor duration in low-risk nulliparous women with spontaneous contractions. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010 Aug;89(8):1034-9. doi: 10.3109/00016349.2010.499446.

  • Dencker A, Taft C, Bergqvist L, Lilja H, Berg M. Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Dec 10;10:81. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-81.

  • Bergqvist L, Dencker A, Taft C, Lilja H, Ladfors L, Skaring-Thorsen L, Berg M. Women's experiences after early versus postponed oxytocin treatment of slow progress in first childbirth--a randomized controlled trial. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2012 Jun;3(2):61-5. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 Mar 24.

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2010

First Posted

December 20, 2010

Study Start

October 1, 1998

Study Completion

December 1, 2003

Last Updated

August 11, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-08

Locations