Safety and Efficacy of QD Versus BID Silodosin With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Suggestive of BPH
Safety and Efficacy of 8mg Once-daily Versus 4mg Twice-daily Silodosin With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Suggestive of BPH ; 12-week, Double-blind, Randomized, Comparison, Multi-center Study
1 other identifier
interventional
424
1 country
14
Brief Summary
Korea has newly adopted 8mg Silodosin once daily. Against these backdrops, this clinical study is designed to demonstrate that the newly adopted dose is not inferior to the existing dose in its efficacy and safety.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Oct 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
14 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 28, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 15, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2011
CompletedMarch 30, 2012
March 1, 2012
1 month
October 28, 2010
March 28, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
I-PSS
Change in I-PSS total score from baseline
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
I-PSS, Qmax, QoL, ICS Male Questionnaire, goal achievement, Treatment satisfaction question
12 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Silodosin 8 mg
EXPERIMENTALSilodosin 4 mg
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who have been diagnosed with BPH through digital rectal exam or ultrasonographic findings and meet the following criteria.
- Outpatients aged 50 or over
- Patients with a total I-PSS score of 8 or higher and a QoL score of 3 or higher
- Patients with a prostate volume measured by transabdominal ultrasonography, or TRUS of 20 ml or greater
- Patients with a maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax\_) of 15ml/sec or below (whose a void urinary volume of 120ml or greater)
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a residual urinary volume of 200ml or greater
- Patients with a history of prostatectomy
- Patients with a history of intrapelvic radiation therapy
- Patients with a history of prostatic hyperthermia
- Patients with prostate cancer or suspected prostate cancer
- Patients with complications considered likely to affect urinary passing such as neurogenic bladder, bladder calculus and active urinary tract infection. UTI
- Patients conducting self-catheterization
- Patients with renal impairment (serum creatinine of 3.0 mg/dl or greater)
- Patients with severe heptic disorders (hepatic insufficiency, cirrhosis, jaundice, hepatoma) or with a total bilirubin of 3.0mg/dL or greater or AST/ALT 2.5 times higher than normal level
- Patients with history of severe arrhythmia, cardiac failure, cardiac infarction, unstable angina, cerebral infarction within 6 months
- Patients with a history of an allergy to α-blockers
- Patients with orthostatic hypotension at around screening visit
- Patients with an experience of other investigational product treatments within 4 weeks form screening visit.
- Patients with a PSA of 10 or over, Patients with tumor identified by a prostate biopsy with a PSA of 4 or over (For patients taking 5α-reductase inhibitors for more than 3 months are presumed to have double than their actual PSA levels.)
- Patients who have taken unstable doses of antidepressants within the 3 months or who are expected to take unstable doses during the study
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (14)
The Catholic Univ., Bucheon ST.Mary's Hospital
Bucheon-si, South Korea
Busan National Univ. Hospital
Busan, South Korea
Konkuk Univ, Chungju Hospital
Chungju, South Korea
Choongnam National Univ. Hospital
Daejeon, South Korea
Eulji Univ. Hospital
Daejeon, South Korea
Chonnam Univ. Hospital
Hwasun, South Korea
Inha Univ. Hosipital
Incheon, South Korea
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, South Korea
Chungang Univ. Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
Korea Univ. Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, South Korea
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
Severance Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
The Catholic Univ., Seoul ST.Mary's Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jae Seung Paick, ph.D
Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 28, 2010
First Posted
December 15, 2010
Study Start
October 1, 2010
Primary Completion
November 1, 2010
Study Completion
October 1, 2011
Last Updated
March 30, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-03