The Balloon Project for Birth Induction
A Prospective Multi-centre Randomised Comparison on Induction of Labour With Double-balloon Installation Device Versus Prostaglandin E2 Minprostin
1 other identifier
interventional
825
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The use of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) for induction of labour in women with unfavourable cervices is well-established1. There are, however, potential side effects to prostaglandins, in particular the risk of uterine hypertonicity which may affect fetal outcome. In theory a mechanical ripening based on dilatation of the cervix as well as induction of production of endogenous prostaglandin has potentially less influence on the fetal outcome but a Cochrane review from 2001 scrutinized studies on mechanical ripening versus placebo/no treatment or prostaglandin E2. They conclude there is insufficient data to evaluate the effectiveness in terms of likelihood of vaginal delivery in 24 hours, and emphasise the need for large sample size studies and substantive outcomes. Two later randomised studies compared mechanical ripening to PGE2 and found discrepant results regarding time from induction to delivery. The primary purpose of the present study was in a randomized design to compare the efficacy of double-balloon catheter versus vaginal PGE2 (minprostin 3 mg) on induction of labour, duration of birth and fetal outcome. Secondary analyses were to evaluate the results for various subgroups, i.e. primipara/multipara, gemelli, vaginal birth after caesarean, preterm birth and intra uterine growth restriction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Dec 2002
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2002
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 6, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 8, 2010
CompletedDecember 8, 2010
January 1, 2002
2.8 years
December 6, 2010
December 7, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
success of induction of labour, duration of birth and fetal outcome
The primary purpose of the present study was in a randomized design to compare the efficacy of double-balloon catheter versus vaginal PGE2 (minprostin 3 mg) .
at birth
Secondary Outcomes (1)
the results for various subgroups, i.e. primipara/multipara, gemelli, vaginal birth after caesarean, preterm birth and intra uterine growth restriction
at birth
Study Arms (2)
Double-balloon
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe Double Balloon Catheter was applied (Atad 5) with 80 ml NaCl installed intrauterine above the intern orificium and 80 ml below in cervix/vagina.
Prostglandin E2
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe prostaglandin 2 minprostin (3mg) was applied vaginally
Interventions
The Double Balloon Catheter was applied (Atad 5) with 80 ml NaCl installed intrauterine above the intern orificium and 80 ml below in cervix/vagina.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- pregnancies with intact fetal membranes
- vertex position
- unripe cervix Bishop score \< 6)
- usual indications for induction of labour, i.e. prolonged pregnancy, pre-eclampsia/ hyper-tension, placental insufficiency, diabetes mellitus and twins
You may not qualify if:
- Spontaneous labour or rupture of membranes
- placenta previa
- acute fetal distress
- specific infections vagina/cervix (GBS, condyloma, acute herpes)
- asthma
- glaucoma
- allergy to latex
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Glostrup University Hospital
Glostrup Municipality, Glostrup, 2600, Denmark
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 6, 2010
First Posted
December 8, 2010
Study Start
December 1, 2002
Primary Completion
September 1, 2005
Study Completion
December 1, 2010
Last Updated
December 8, 2010
Record last verified: 2002-01