NCT01255839

Brief Summary

The use of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) for induction of labour in women with unfavourable cervices is well-established1. There are, however, potential side effects to prostaglandins, in particular the risk of uterine hypertonicity which may affect fetal outcome. In theory a mechanical ripening based on dilatation of the cervix as well as induction of production of endogenous prostaglandin has potentially less influence on the fetal outcome but a Cochrane review from 2001 scrutinized studies on mechanical ripening versus placebo/no treatment or prostaglandin E2. They conclude there is insufficient data to evaluate the effectiveness in terms of likelihood of vaginal delivery in 24 hours, and emphasise the need for large sample size studies and substantive outcomes. Two later randomised studies compared mechanical ripening to PGE2 and found discrepant results regarding time from induction to delivery. The primary purpose of the present study was in a randomized design to compare the efficacy of double-balloon catheter versus vaginal PGE2 (minprostin 3 mg) on induction of labour, duration of birth and fetal outcome. Secondary analyses were to evaluate the results for various subgroups, i.e. primipara/multipara, gemelli, vaginal birth after caesarean, preterm birth and intra uterine growth restriction.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
825

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2002

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2002

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2005

Completed
5.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2010

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 6, 2010

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 8, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

December 8, 2010

Status Verified

January 1, 2002

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

December 6, 2010

Last Update Submit

December 7, 2010

Conditions

Keywords

double-balloonballoon catheterprostaglandinminprostininduction of labourfetal outcome

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • success of induction of labour, duration of birth and fetal outcome

    The primary purpose of the present study was in a randomized design to compare the efficacy of double-balloon catheter versus vaginal PGE2 (minprostin 3 mg) .

    at birth

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • the results for various subgroups, i.e. primipara/multipara, gemelli, vaginal birth after caesarean, preterm birth and intra uterine growth restriction

    at birth

Study Arms (2)

Double-balloon

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The Double Balloon Catheter was applied (Atad 5) with 80 ml NaCl installed intrauterine above the intern orificium and 80 ml below in cervix/vagina.

Device: Double Balloon

Prostglandin E2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The prostaglandin 2 minprostin (3mg) was applied vaginally

Drug: Minprostin

Interventions

The Double Balloon Catheter was applied (Atad 5) with 80 ml NaCl installed intrauterine above the intern orificium and 80 ml below in cervix/vagina.

Double-balloon

The prostaglandin 2 minprostin (3mg) was applied vaginally

Prostglandin E2

Eligibility Criteria

Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • pregnancies with intact fetal membranes
  • vertex position
  • unripe cervix Bishop score \< 6)
  • usual indications for induction of labour, i.e. prolonged pregnancy, pre-eclampsia/ hyper-tension, placental insufficiency, diabetes mellitus and twins

You may not qualify if:

  • Spontaneous labour or rupture of membranes
  • placenta previa
  • acute fetal distress
  • specific infections vagina/cervix (GBS, condyloma, acute herpes)
  • asthma
  • glaucoma
  • allergy to latex

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Glostrup University Hospital

Glostrup Municipality, Glostrup, 2600, Denmark

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Double-Balloon Enteroscopydinoprost tromethamine

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Balloon EnteroscopyEndoscopy, GastrointestinalEndoscopy, Digestive SystemDiagnostic Techniques, Digestive SystemDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisEndoscopyDiagnostic Techniques, SurgicalDigestive System Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativeMinimally Invasive Surgical Procedures

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2010

First Posted

December 8, 2010

Study Start

December 1, 2002

Primary Completion

September 1, 2005

Study Completion

December 1, 2010

Last Updated

December 8, 2010

Record last verified: 2002-01

Locations