Non-dependent HFPPV Versus CPAP for Video-assisted Thoracoscopy
Comparative Study of the Non-dependent Continuous Positive Pressure Ventilation and High Frequency Positive Pressure Ventilation During One-lung Ventilation for Thoracoscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is usually performed using well-collapsed lung is essential for optimum surgical visualization and resection. However, one lung ventilation (OLV) is associated with deleterious impaired oxygenation secondary to the increases in shunt fraction.1 There are different approaches for the recruitment of the non-dependent lung (NL) during OLV such as the selective application of continuous positive pressure ventilation (CPAP) or high frequency positive pressure ventilation (HFPPV) to the non-dependent lung.2-4 These strategies may improve arterial oxygenation and reduce shunt fraction,2-4 However, the use of high CPAP levels impaired the surgical conditions during thoracotomy.2-3 On contrary, the application of HFPPV either to both lungs5or to the non-dependent lung permits adequate surgical conditions during thoracotomy.4 The investigators hypothesize that the application of volume-controlled HFPPV to the non-dependent lung during OLV for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery may provide better surgical field and adequate oxygenation than the use of CPAP 2 cm H2O. The investigators will evaluate the effects of the selective application of conventional one lung ventilation, HFPPV, or CPAP 2 cm H2O to the non-dependent lung on surgical field conditions, and arterial oxygen and carbon dioxide tensions (PaO2 and PaCO2, respectively) during OLV in the patients scheduled for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started May 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 22, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 7, 2010
CompletedDecember 8, 2010
December 1, 2010
6 months
November 22, 2010
December 6, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual Analog Scale rating of the surgical field conditions
Visual analog Scoring assesment of the surgical field conditions will be rated by the surgeons. VAS of 10 denotes the best surgical fied and VAS of 0 attributes inability to proceed with surgery
every 15 min from the start of surgery
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Hemodynamic variables
every 15 min from the start of surgery
Respiratory variables
every 15 min from the start of surgery
Study Arms (2)
CPAP2 - HFPPV group
ACTIVE COMPARATORthe non-dependent lung will be ventilated with CPAP of 2 cm H2O for 30 min followed with HFPPV for min.
HFPPV-CPAP2 group
ACTIVE COMPARATORthe non-dependent lung will be ventilated with HFPPV for 30 min followed with CPAP of 2 cm H2O for 30 min.
Interventions
the dependent lung will be ventilated with conventional ventilation (OLV) a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg (predicted body weight), whereas FiO2, I: E ratio, PEEP, frequency, peak inspiratory pressures, and a flow of fresh gas will be maintained as during two-lung ventilation for 15 min. Then the non-dependent lung will be allowed to deflate to a CPAP of 2 cm H2O, which will be connected to the flowmeter of an oxygen cylinder with a flow rate of 5 L/min and FiO2 of 1.0 for 30 min Then, the non-dependent lung will be connected to a second identical ventilator, 15 min after OLV, using a FiO2 of 1.0, VT 3 mL/kg (predicted body weight), I: E ratio \<0.3 and R.R 60 breaths/min for further 30 min.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- elective video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with at least one hour of one-lung ventilation (OLV)
You may not qualify if:
- decompensated cardiac diseases(\>New York Heart Association II)
- pulmonary diseases(vital capacity or FEV1% \< 50% of the predicted values)
- hepatic diseases
- renal diseases
- arrhythmias
- pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary artery pressure \>30 mm Hg)
- previous history of pneumonectomy
- bilobectomy
- lobectomy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
King Fahd hospital of the University of Dammam
Khobar, Eastern Province, 31952, Saudi Arabia
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohamed R El Tahan, M.D.
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 22, 2010
First Posted
December 7, 2010
Study Start
May 1, 2010
Primary Completion
November 1, 2010
Study Completion
November 1, 2010
Last Updated
December 8, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-12