Inter-rater and Intra-rater Reliability Study of the Global Eyelash Assessment Scale for Assessment of Overall Eyelash Prominence
1 other identifier
observational
68
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will evaluate the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the Global Eyelash Assessment (GEA) scale with photonumeric guide in Japanese subjects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Dec 2010
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 2, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 28, 2012
CompletedSeptember 28, 2012
August 1, 2012
Same day
December 1, 2010
November 30, 2011
August 24, 2012
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Overall Inter-Rater Reliability of Assessing Overall Eyelash Prominence Using the Japanese Global Eyelash Assessment Scale (GEA-J) at Day 1
Inter-rater agreement (among raters) of the GEA-J scores (1=minimum,2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked) to assess eyelash prominence was evaluated using Kendall's coefficient of concordance (Kendall's W). Each of 7 raters who scored 68 subjects' eyelashes using GEA-J Scale with photonumeric guide at 2 different time points at day 1. The overall inter-rater agreement for Kendall's W for all raters combined was estimated based on the average of the scores from those 2 different time points. The degree of agreement of the point estimates of Kendall's W was interpreted according to the reference range scale that was pre-defined as: \<=0: poor, 0.00-0.20: slightly, 0.21-0.40: fair, 0.41-0.60: moderate, 0.61-0.80: substantial, 0.81-1:00: almost perfect. The 95% confidence interval for Kendall's W is provided.
Day 1
Overall Intra-Rater Reliability of Assessing Overall Eyelash Prominence Using the Japanese Global Eyelash Assessment Scale (GEA-J) at Day 1
Intra-rater (within raters) agreement of the GEA-J scores (1=minimum, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked) to assess eyelash prominence was evaluated by weighted Kappa statistics. Weighted Kappa statistics were calculated for each of 7 rater who evaluated 68 subjects using GEA-J scale with photonumeric guide, assessing agreement between 2 different time points at day 1. The overall intra-rater agreement for Kappa statistics for all raters combined was estimated by pooling Kappa statistics for each rater using a chi-square statistic. The degree of agreement of the point estimates of Kappa statistics was interpreted according to the reference range scale that was pre-defined as: \<=0: poor, 0.00-0.20: slightly, 0.21-0.40: fair, 0.41-0.60: moderate, 0.61-0.80: substantial, 0.81-1:00: almost perfect. The 95% confidence interval for Kappa statistics is provided.
Day 1
Interventions
No treatment (intervention) will be provided in this study
Eligibility Criteria
Japanese adults
You may qualify if:
- Able and willing to remove all eye makeup and facial jewelry during study
You may not qualify if:
- Permanent eyelid makeup or eyelash implants of any kind
- Eyelash tint or dye application within 2 months
- Eyelash extensions within 3 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Allerganlead
Study Sites (1)
Unknown Facility
Ueno, Tokyo, Japan
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Therapeutic Area Head
- Organization
- Allergan, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Medical Director
Allergan
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 1, 2010
First Posted
December 2, 2010
Study Start
December 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2010
Study Completion
December 1, 2010
Last Updated
September 28, 2012
Results First Posted
September 28, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-08