Comparison of Tranexamic to Epsilon Aminocaproic Acid: a Prospective Analysis of Blood Conservation in Cardiac Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
We designed a prospective double-blinded randomized trial in an attempt to detect a difference between tranexamic acid (TXA) and epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) in reducing transfusion in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 15, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 25, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 26, 2020
CompletedOctober 19, 2020
September 1, 2020
3 years
November 15, 2010
October 11, 2016
September 22, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Total Transfusion Amounts
The outcome measure was the intergroup difference in total transfusion amounts up to post-operative day 2.
48 hours
Study Arms (2)
Tranexamic Acid
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe research pharmacist used computer randomization to assign patients to receive either TXA or EACA. The TXA group re- ceived a bolus of 10 mg / kg over 15 minutes fol- lowed by an infusion of 1 mg/kg/hr.
Aminocaproic Acid
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe research pharmacist used computer randomization to assign patients to receive either TXA or EACA. The EACA group received a bolus of 100 mg / kg given over 15 minutes shortly after induction of anesthesia followed by an infusion of 10 mg/kg/hr.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Is the subject 18 years of age or older?
- Is the subject scheduled for primary cardiac surgery utilizing cardiopulmonary bypass(CPB)?
- Is the subject more than 30 kg ( 66 lbs)?
- Does subject understand English?
You may not qualify if:
- Does the subject have existing coagulation defects (INR \> 1.5, platelets \< 100 ?
- Does the subject have renal failure (defined as BUN/Cr ratio 20:1 ?
- Does the subject have severe liver disease (AST \& ALT\> 3x normal) ?
- Is the subject having emergency cardiac surgery, complex aortic surgery, combination valve/CABG surgeries, or redo cardiac surgery?
- Is the subject having any procedure where CPB is not anticipated?
- Is the patient weight greater than 150 kg?
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Loma Linda University Medical Center
Loma Linda, California, 92354, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Jason Gatling
- Organization
- Loma Linda University Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jason Gatling, MD
Loma Linda University Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 15, 2010
First Posted
November 25, 2010
Study Start
March 1, 2010
Primary Completion
March 1, 2013
Study Completion
February 1, 2015
Last Updated
October 19, 2020
Results First Posted
August 26, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share