Study Stopped
Study was not initiated, change in clinical development
Aggrastat Truncated Length Against Standard Therapies in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
ATLAST-PCI
A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Tirofiban HCl Versus Placebo in the Setting of Standard Therapies Among Subjects Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the efficacy of tirofiban (a 25mcg/kg i.v. bolus followed by a 0.15mcg/kg/min i.v. infusion during a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) plus two hours after the procedure) is more effective than placebo in the setting of standard therapies (e.g. aspirin, a thienopyridine, and unfractionated heparin or bivalirudin) among patients undergoing PCI, as assessed by the incidence of adverse cardiac ischemic events defined as death, myocardial infarction (MI), and urgent target vessel revascularization (uTVR) within 48 hours following study drug initiation. A secondary objective of this study is to assess whether tirofiban (a 25mcg/kg i.v. bolus followed by a 0.15mcg/kg/min i.v. infusion during a PCI plus two hours after the procedure) is safe compared to placebo in the setting of standard therapies (e.g. aspirin, a thienopyridine, and unfractionated heparin or bivalirudin) among patients undergoing PCI, as assessed by the incidence of non-CABG-related TIMI major bleeding within 48 hours following study drug initiation. Patient enrollment is pending.
Trial Health
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 12, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 22, 2010
CompletedMarch 13, 2018
March 1, 2018
November 12, 2010
March 9, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
A composite incidence of death, myocardial infarction and urgent target vessel revascularization.
48 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The occurrence of myocardial infarction.
48 hours
Study Arms (2)
Tirofiban (Aggrastat)
EXPERIMENTALPlacebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Tirofiban (Aggrastat) will be dosed as a 25mcg/kg i.v. bolus followed by a 0.15mcg/kg/min i.v. infusion during a percutaneous coronary intervention plus two hours after the procedure. Patients will receive tirofiban (Aggrastat) on a background of oral anti-platelet agent(s) and either unfractionated heparin (50U/kg and repeat dosing guided per guidelines) or bivalirudin as per local practice and physician discretion.
Placebo will be dosed as an i.v. bolus followed by an i.v. infusion during a percutaneous coronary intervention plus two hours after the procedure. Patients will receive placebo on a background of oral anti-platelet agent(s) and either unfractionated heparin (50U/kg and repeat dosing guided per guidelines) or bivalirudin as per local practice and physician discretion.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \>18 years of age
- Scheduled to undergo PCI with an approved device
- Written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Primary PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)
- Prior PCI within 30 days
- Prior GPIIb/IIIa use within 14 days
- Prior enoxaparin use within 4 days
- Prior STEMI within 30 days
- In non-elective subjects, a rising troponin defined as a most recent pre-PCI sample greater than the sample immediately preceding it, as long as the two samples are separated by four or more hours and have been analyzed in the same hospital laboratory.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Medicurelead
- SCRI Development Innovations, LLCcollaborator
Related Publications (6)
Topol EJ, Moliterno DJ, Herrmann HC, Powers ER, Grines CL, Cohen DJ, Cohen EA, Bertrand M, Neumann FJ, Stone GW, DiBattiste PM, Demopoulos L; TARGET Investigators. Do Tirofiban and ReoPro Give Similar Efficacy Trial. Comparison of two platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, tirofiban and abciximab, for the prevention of ischemic events with percutaneous coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2001 Jun 21;344(25):1888-94. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200106213442502.
PMID: 11419425BACKGROUNDValgimigli M, Percoco G, Barbieri D, Ferrari F, Guardigli G, Parrinello G, Soukhomovskaia O, Ferrari R. The additive value of tirofiban administered with the high-dose bolus in the prevention of ischemic complications during high-risk coronary angioplasty: the ADVANCE Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Jul 7;44(1):14-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.03.042.
PMID: 15234398BACKGROUNDValgimigli M, Campo G, de Cesare N, Meliga E, Vranckx P, Furgieri A, Angiolillo DJ, Sabate M, Hamon M, Repetto A, Colangelo S, Brugaletta S, Parrinello G, Percoco G, Ferrari R; Tailoring Treatment With Tirofiban in Patients Showing Resistance to Aspirin and/or Resistance to Clopidogrel (3T/2R) Investigators. Intensifying platelet inhibition with tirofiban in poor responders to aspirin, clopidogrel, or both agents undergoing elective coronary intervention: results from the double-blind, prospective, randomized Tailoring Treatment with Tirofiban in Patients Showing Resistance to Aspirin and/or Resistance to Clopidogrel study. Circulation. 2009 Jun 30;119(25):3215-22. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.833236. Epub 2009 Jun 15.
PMID: 19528337BACKGROUNDValgimigli M, Campo G, Percoco G, Bolognese L, Vassanelli C, Colangelo S, de Cesare N, Rodriguez AE, Ferrario M, Moreno R, Piva T, Sheiban I, Pasquetto G, Prati F, Nazzaro MS, Parrinello G, Ferrari R; Multicentre Evaluation of Single High-Dose Bolus Tirofiban vs Abciximab With Sirolimus-Eluting Stent or Bare Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Study (MULTISTRATEGY) Investigators. Comparison of angioplasty with infusion of tirofiban or abciximab and with implantation of sirolimus-eluting or uncoated stents for acute myocardial infarction: the MULTISTRATEGY randomized trial. JAMA. 2008 Apr 16;299(15):1788-99. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.15.joc80026. Epub 2008 Mar 30.
PMID: 18375998BACKGROUNDValgimigli M, Tebaldi M. Safety evaluation of tirofiban. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2010 Sep;9(5):801-19. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2010.507189.
PMID: 20670206BACKGROUNDMoliterno DJ; TENACITY Steering Committee and Investigators. A randomized two-by-two comparison of high-dose bolus tirofiban versus abciximab and unfractionated heparin versus bivalirudin during percutaneous coronary revascularization and stent placement: the tirofiban evaluation of novel dosing versus abciximab with clopidogrel and inhibition of thrombin (TENACITY) study trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jun 1;77(7):1001-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22876. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
PMID: 21598351BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Steven V Manoukian, MD
SCRI Development Innovations, LLC
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 12, 2010
First Posted
November 22, 2010
Last Updated
March 13, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03