Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Placulumab (CEP-37247) Administered by the Transforaminal Epidural Route for the Treatment of Patients With Lumbosacral Radicular Pain Associated With Disk Herniation
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Ascending-Dose Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CEP-37247 Administered at Single Doses of 0.5, 1, 3, 6, or 12 mg by the Transforaminal Epidural Route for the Treatment of Patients With Lumbosacral Radicular Pain Associated With Disk Herniation
1 other identifier
interventional
98
2 countries
24
Brief Summary
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CEP-37247 compared with placebo as assessed by the occurrence of adverse events, and the mean change in average pain intensity (API) in the affected leg.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Jan 2011
Typical duration for phase_1
24 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 10, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 15, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2013
CompletedJuly 21, 2016
July 1, 2016
2.2 years
November 10, 2010
July 19, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Occurrence of adverse events compared to placebo
throughout the 28-week double-blind treatment period
Mean change in the weekly average of daily average pain intensity (API) in the affected leg on the 11-Point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11)
The average pain intensity over the past 24 hours on the NRS-11 will be collected daily by electronic diary.
at week 4 compared with baseline
Secondary Outcomes (19)
Weekly average of daily leg API score as assessed by the NRS-11 from electronic diary entries
at each of the first 6 weeks
Weekly average of daily back API score as assessed by the NRS-11 from electronic diary entries
at each of the first 6 weeks
Weekly average of daily worst leg pain score as assessed by the NRS-11 from electronic diary entries
at each of the first 6 weeks
Weekly average of daily worst back pain score as assessed by the NRS-11 from electronic diary entries
at each of the first 6 weeks
Patients with 30% and 50% reductions in average pain over the previous 24 hours as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF)
at 1, 2, 4, 6, 14, and 28 weeks
- +14 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
CEP-37247
EXPERIMENTALMatching placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Over the 4 days prior to the randomization visit, the patient has a mean score greater than or equal to 5 (of 10) for "Average Pain Over the Past 24 Hours" for the pain in the affected leg as assessed by the 11-Point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11) captured in the electronic diaries. The patient must have valid (non-missing) data for at least 3 out of the 4 days, and the mean score must be at least 5 without rounding.
- The patient has a current diagnosis of lumbosacral radicular pain. Pain must radiate into the leg in a dermatomal/myotomal distribution consistent with the diagnosis of lumbosacral radicular pain in the suspected involved nerve root. Based on history and medical records (if available), the duration of the current episode of pain must be between 6 and 52 weeks duration.
- Diagnosis must be confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (or existing computed tomography \[CT\] or MRI related to the symptoms present at screening) performed within 6 months prior to screening and demonstrating disk herniation at a location consistent with the clinical symptoms of radicular pain. Other incidental pathology is permitted as long as it is asymptomatic and believed not causal of the primary diagnosis of lumbosacral radicular pain at the specific spinal level as described below.
- The patient must have at least 1 of the following: a positive straight leg raise (L5-S1), positive femoral stretch test (L3-L4), or other positive test result upon physical examination that is consistent with the presence of nerve root irritation at the nerve root suspected to be involved in the diagnosed lumbosacral radicular pain at screening.
- Herniation must affect L3-L4, L4-L5, or L5-S1 and must be consistent with clinical presentation of the current episode of lumbosacral radicular pain as described above.
- Patients with significant or progressive sensory impairment or motor impairment (such as foot drop) must be assessed on a case-by-case basis by the investigator, and must in each case receive written approval of the Sponsor prior to randomization.
- There must be confirmation that the patient does not have an active tuberculosis infection at screening. The patient should have either a negative QuantiFERON®-TB Gold blood test or negative tuberculin skin test (TST) result at screening; however if QuantiFERON®-TB Gold test or TST is positive, a chest radiogram may be used to determine whether a patient has an active infection.
- The patient is willing to keep all analgesic medication and other therapy usage (such as physiotherapy, acupuncture, or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation \[TENS\]) stable or decreased during the study and use only the rescue pain medication as needed and as specified by the protocol.
- The patient is in good health (with the exception of the condition under study) as determined by a medical and psychiatric history, medical examination, ECG, serum chemistry, hematology, urinalysis, and serology.
- Women of childbearing potential (ie, not surgically sterile or 2 years postmenopausal), must use a medically accepted method of contraception and must agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study, and have a negative pregnancy test at screening.
You may not qualify if:
- The patient:
- has a documented history of an allergic reaction (hives, rash, etc.) or a clinically significant intolerance to study drug or ingredients.
- has a body mass index (BMI) greater than 40 kg/m2.
- the patient has an established history of a major psychiatric disorder, not controlled with medication or appears to have anxiety that would interfere with clinical pain scores or participation in the trial.
- has clinically significant abnormalities in clinical chemistry, hematology or urinalysis, including serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase/aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) greater than or equal to 3 times the upper limit of the reference range or an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than or equal to 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease \[MDRD\] study formula) at screening.
- has received an intra-epidural steroid injection for the treatment of the current episode of sciatica during the last 3 months prior to screening.
- has significant pain unrelated to the disk herniation that would significantly compromise assessment of the radicular back and leg pain related to the disk herniation.
- has radiologic evidence of disk herniation at more than 1 spinal level, and clinical evidence of lumbosacral radicular pain at more than 1 spinal nerve corresponding to the levels of the multiple disk herniations.
- has received any investigational drug within 30 days prior to screening, or is scheduled to receive an investigational drug other than blinded study drug during the course of this study.
- has had lumbar or sacral back surgery related to the specific disk that is the cause of the radicular pain upon presentation to the study, or currently plans to undergo spine surgical intervention while in the study.
- has received epidural corticosteroid injections in the back within 3 months of screening.
- is involved in an ongoing worker's compensation claim, disability claim, or litigation related to any pain problem.
- has any active infection that is not self-limiting and not resolved prior to study drug administration.
- has a history of malignancy or evidence of malignancy or lymphoproliferative or neoplastic disease with the exception of successfully treated basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia within 5 years of the screening visit.
- has a history of systemic fungal infection.
- +13 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cephalonlead
Study Sites (24)
Teva Investigational Site 22
La Mesa, California, United States
Teva Investigational Site 18
Laguna Hills, California, United States
Teva Investigational Site 19
Pasadena, California, United States
Teva Investigational Site 2
Pasadena, California, United States
Teva Investigational Site 14
Orlando, Florida, United States
Teva Investigational Site 5
Sarasota, Florida, United States
Teva Investigational Site 10
Marietta, Georgia, United States
Teva Investigational Site 13
Marietta, Georgia, United States
Teva Investigational Site 9
Bloomington, Illinois, United States
Teva Investigational Site 15
Overland Park, Kansas, United States
Teva Investigational Site 8
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
Teva Investigational Site 20
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Teva Investigational Site 16
Dayton, Ohio, United States
Teva Investigational Site 21
Eugene, Oregon, United States
Teva Investigational Site 17
Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States
Teva Investigational Site 1
Greenville, South Carolina, United States
Teva Investigational Site 11
North Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Teva Investigational Site 6
Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States
Teva Investigational Site 4
Orem, Utah, United States
Teva Investigational Site 3
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Teva Investigational Site 103
Caulfied South, Australia
Teva Investigational Site 102
Malvern East, Australia
Teva Investigational Site 100
North Terrace, Australia
Teva Investigational Site 101
St Leonards, Australia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Sponsor's Medical Expert, Associate Director, Clinical Research, MD, PhD
Cephalon
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 10, 2010
First Posted
November 15, 2010
Study Start
January 1, 2011
Primary Completion
March 1, 2013
Study Completion
April 1, 2013
Last Updated
July 21, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-07