A Comparison of Aspheric Toric Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation Versus Aspheric Non-Toric Lens Implantation
A Randomized, Prospective, Multi-Center, Patient-Masked, Bilateral Comparison of Aspheric Toric Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation Versus Aspheric Non-Toric Lens Implantation
1 other identifier
interventional
24
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare uncorrected distance visual acuity measurement in pseudophakic subjects with bilateral implantation of an AcrySof IQ Toric Intraocular Lens (IOL) versus bilateral implantation of an AcrySof IQ IOL.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2011
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 20, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 21, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 24, 2013
CompletedOctober 29, 2013
September 1, 2013
1.3 years
October 20, 2010
July 22, 2013
September 24, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Monocular Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (Monocular UCDVA) at Month 3
Uncorrected visual acuity (i.e., visual acuity measured without spectacles or other visual corrective devices) was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts at 100% contrast and measured in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). Each eye was assessed, and both eyes contributed to the mean. LogMAR 0.00 is equivalent of 20/20 and LogMAR 1.0 is equivalent of 20/200. A more negative logMAR value would indicate a greater improvement in visual acuity.
Month 3
Study Arms (2)
Toric T3 - T9
EXPERIMENTALAcrySof IQ Toric IOL surgically implanted in the capsular bag of the eye following cataract removal. Both eyes were implanted, with the second eye implanted at least 1 week after and within 1 month of the first eye.
IQ SN60WF
ACTIVE COMPARATORAcrySof IQ IOL surgically implanted in the capsular bag of the eye following cataract removal. Both eyes were implanted, with the second eye implanted at least 1 week after and within 1 month of the first eye.
Interventions
Commercially available, acrylic, multifocal IOL intended to provide visual correction over the lifetime of the cataract patient
Commercially available, acrylic, monofocal IOL intended to provide visual correction over the lifetime of the cataract patient
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Willing and able to understand and sign an informed consent;
- Willing and able to attend post-operative examinations per protocol schedule;
- In good ocular health, with the exception of cataracts;
- Age-related cataracts in both eyes that require extraction followed by implantation of an intraocular lens;
- Pre-operative corneal cylinder of greater than or equal to 0.75 diopter as determined by auto keratometry;
- In good ocular health, with the exception of cataracts;
- Free of diseases/conditions listed in the precautions of the AcrySof® Toric and AcrySof® IQ package inserts;
You may not qualify if:
- Previous corneal surgery;
- Corneal abnormality that would prevent stable and reliable visual acuity and refractive measures;
- Planned multiple procedures during cataract/IOL implantation surgery;
- Ocular disease and/or condition that may compromise study results;
- Ocular trauma, infections or nasolacrimal drainage system malfunction within 3 months of enrolment;
- Pregnant or planning pregnancy during course of study;
- Participation in any other investigational study within 30 days prior to enrolment;
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Alcon Researchlead
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This study was considered a pilot study and did not have an expectation to meet any of the study endpoints.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Manoj Venkiteshwar, Brand Lead, Global Medical Affairs
- Organization
- Alcon Research, Ltd.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 20, 2010
First Posted
October 21, 2010
Study Start
March 1, 2011
Primary Completion
June 1, 2012
Study Completion
June 1, 2012
Last Updated
October 29, 2013
Results First Posted
September 24, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-09