Study to Compare Self-administered and Nurse-administered Intradermal Influenza Vaccine
A Randomized Controlled Trial To Compare The Immunogenicity Of Self-Administered And Nurse-Administered Intradermal Influenza Vaccine
1 other identifier
interventional
276
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of self-administered intradermal influenza vaccine (Intanza)to nurse-administered.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Nov 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 14, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 20, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2011
CompletedJune 15, 2011
June 1, 2011
2 months
October 14, 2010
June 14, 2011
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Immunogenicity
That the immunogenicity of self-administered intradermal 2010/11 seasonal influenza vaccine (Intanza) is non-inferior to that of nurse administered intradermal 2010/11 seasonal influenza vaccine. Specifically, that ratio of increase in geometric mean titres between day 0 and day 21 post-vaccination are greater than 2/3 (i.e. GMT (IDS)/GMT (IDN) \> 0.65).
21 days post-vaccination
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Reactogenicity
7 days post-vaccination
Observational
at vaccination
Study Arms (2)
Intanza - self-administered
ACTIVE COMPARATORSelf-administered intradermal influenza vaccine
Intanza - nurse-administered
ACTIVE COMPARATORNurse-administered intradermal influenza vaccine
Interventions
0.1 mL of Intanza intradermally at visit # 1
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Medically stable persons between age of 18-60
- Available during the trial period and for follow-up
- Able to read, understand, and sign informed consent
- Able to be contacted by telephone for follow-up of adverse events
You may not qualify if:
- Use of experimental vaccines within the month prior to study entry, or expected use of experimental or licensed vaccines or blood/blood products during the duration of the study.
- Receipt of immunoglobulin or other blood product within 3 months prior to enrollment
- Receipt of other licensed vaccines within the preceding 4 weeks
- History of a severe reaction following influenza vaccination
- Use of cytotoxic therapy or biologic modifiers in the previous 2 years.
- Plans to receive cytotoxic therapy during the study period.
- Concurrent acute moderate to severe illness. (Vaccination will be deferred until recovery. Subjects with mild illnesses with fever ≤37.8ºC orally may be enrolled).
- History of medical disorder associated with immunosuppression (eg. including HIV-infected individuals, transplant recipients)
- History of chronic lung, cardiac, renal or liver disease, which has required hospitalization in the last year.
- Receipt of any high-dose daily systemic corticosteroids (inhaled steroids are acceptable) within two weeks of study entry. High dose is defined as a dose of 20 mg of prednisone daily or its equivalent. Topical steroids are allowed.
- Failure to give written, informed consent
- History of febrile illness (\>37.8ºC orally) within the past 72 hours (immunization may be deferred).
- Known allergy to eggs or other components of vaccine (i.e., thimerosal)
- History of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Dalhousie Universitylead
- IWK Health Centrecollaborator
- MCM Vaccines B.V.collaborator
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Canadacollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Canadian Center for Vaccinology
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3K 6R8, Canada
Mount Sinai Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5K 1X5, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Coleman BL, McGeer AJ, Halperin SA, Langley JM, Shamout Y, Taddio A, Shah V, McNeil SA. A randomized control trial comparing immunogenicity, safety, and preference for self- versus nurse-administered intradermal influenza vaccine. Vaccine. 2012 Sep 28;30(44):6287-93. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.08.006. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
PMID: 22902784DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shelly McNeil, MD
Canadian Center for Vaccinology
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 14, 2010
First Posted
October 20, 2010
Study Start
November 1, 2010
Primary Completion
January 1, 2011
Study Completion
February 1, 2011
Last Updated
June 15, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-06