Capnography During Nurse Administered Propofol Sedation
Assessment of Capnography in Monitoring Patients During Nurse Administered Deep Sedation With Propofol
1 other identifier
interventional
440
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Rationale: The current standard of respiratory monitoring for patients during deep sedation is continuous pulse oximetry with visual assessment of the patient. Clinical research has demonstrated that depressed respiratory activity is a principal risk factor for hypoxemia during sedation. Capnography may provide early detection of alveolar hypoventilation before hypoxemia has occurred in nonintubated patients and thereby improve patient safety during sedation. Objective: At the Centre for Contraception, Sexuality and Abortion Leiden, abortion procedures are performed under deep sedation using propofol. Patient's monitoring is performed by nurses qualified in patient sedation management, using pulse oximetry and their clinical judgement. The aim of this study is to examine the effectiveness of capnography in early detection of alveolar hypoventilation during deep sedation in comparison to standard monitoring with pulse oximetry in abortion procedures. Study design: This protocol describes a prospective, open, randomized controlled trial with two study arms. All patients receive standard care of monitoring performed by the medical staff. The study investigates whether capnography prevents patients from having respiratory events during deep sedation in abortion procedures by early detection and therapy. Patients randomized to the standard care group receive standard of respiratory monitoring using pulse oximetry. In the capnography arm, respiratory monitoring is performed with pulse oximetry and capnography. Study population: The study population comprises female patients (≥ 18 years) undergoing abortion procedures during first or second trimester pregnancies. Abortion procedures are performed until 22 weeks of gestational age. Capnography: In addition application of capnography during deep sedation with propofol is performed. Before the trial starts, all nurses qualified in patient sedation management and abortion doctors will be trained in assessment of capnography. In the capnography arm, patients' breathing is additionally monitored with capnography. If alveolar hypoventilation is detected medical staff will intervene by arousing the patient, performing chin lift, repositioning the head, provision of oxygen, or abandon from giving additional propofol. These interventions represent the standard of care currently used by the clinical staff to respond to hypoventilation and hypoxemia. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome is the occurrence of oxygen saturations to ≤90% in the population, as measured by continuous pulse oximetry. Secondary study outcomes include occurrence of oxygen saturations \< 80%, dose of administered propofol, arousal or movement of the patient during the procedure, airway interventions, early termination of the procedure due to respiratory problems, episodes of bradycardia, and administration of atropine. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The risks related to the conduct of this study are negligible and the burden minimal. Patients in both groups receive the current standard of care. Patients randomized in the capnography group could get benefit from the addition of capnography to the monitoring by early detection of alveolar hypoventilation. Capnography is a noninvasive measurement by means of a cannula under the nose, which before the sedation may tickle, but during sedation no inconvenience is expected.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2010
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 12, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 14, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2011
CompletedJune 10, 2011
April 1, 2010
10 months
October 12, 2010
June 9, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of patients having saturations (SpO2 below 90%) in the two arms
Occurrence of oxygen saturations below 90% measured by continuous pulse oximetry in the two study arms; capnography vs. standard care
Desaturations during the sedation procedure, within 1 hour after administering the first propofol dose
Secondary Outcomes (2)
proportion of patients necessitating airway interventions
Airway interventions during the sedation procedure within 1 hour after the first propofol dose
Proportion of patients having deep desaturations (SpO2 below 80%) in the two study arms
Desaturations during the sedation procedure, within 1 hour after the first propofol dose
Study Arms (2)
Standard care
NO INTERVENTIONPatients randomized to the standard care group receive standard of care using pulse oximetry
Capnography
EXPERIMENTALIn the intervention group capnography is measured using a cannula under the nose connected to the capnograph. The capnographic device displays respiratory rate, end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) levels, and continuous waveforms.
Interventions
In the capnography arm, respiratory monitoring is performed with pulse oximetry and capnography. If the capnogram indicates sub-optimal ventilation and/or apnea, denoted as a flat line on the capnometer for ≥ 15 seconds, a respiratory rate ≤ 6, or a end-tidal CO2 \> 50 mmHg, medical staff will intervene by arousing the patient, performing chinlift or jawthrust, abandon from giving additional propofol, or provision of oxygen. The nurse qualified in sedation management will assess capnography him/ herself.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- UMC Utrechtlead
- CASA, Leidencollaborator
Study Sites (1)
CASA, Centre for Contraception, Sexuality and Abortion clinic,
Leiden, 2313 DH, Netherlands
Related Publications (7)
Vargo JJ, Zuccaro G Jr, Dumot JA, Shermock KM, Morrow JB, Conwell DL, Trolli PA, Maurer WG. Gastroenterologist-administered propofol versus meperidine and midazolam for advanced upper endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 2002 Jul;123(1):8-16. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.34232.
PMID: 12105827BACKGROUNDGriffin SM, Chung SC, Leung JW, Li AK. Effect of intranasal oxygen on hypoxia and tachycardia during endoscopic cholangiopancreatography. BMJ. 1990 Jan 13;300(6717):83-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6717.83. No abstract available.
PMID: 2105779BACKGROUNDColman Y, Krauss B. Microstream capnograpy technology: a new approach to an old problem. J Clin Monit Comput. 1999 Aug;15(6):403-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1009981115299.
PMID: 12578035BACKGROUNDLightdale JR, Goldmann DA, Feldman HA, Newburg AR, DiNardo JA, Fox VL. Microstream capnography improves patient monitoring during moderate sedation: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2006 Jun;117(6):e1170-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1709. Epub 2006 May 15.
PMID: 16702250BACKGROUNDQadeer MA, Vargo JJ, Dumot JA, Lopez R, Trolli PA, Stevens T, Parsi MA, Sanaka MR, Zuccaro G. Capnographic monitoring of respiratory activity improves safety of sedation for endoscopic cholangiopancreatography and ultrasonography. Gastroenterology. 2009 May;136(5):1568-76; quiz 1819-20. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.02.004.
PMID: 19422079BACKGROUNDGrobbee DE, Hoes AW. Randomized trials. In: Grobbee DE, Hoes AW, editors. Clinical Epidemiology. Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett; 2008. p. 270-287.
BACKGROUNDClarke JP. Sedation for endoscopy: the safe use of propofol by general practitioners. Med J Aust. 2002 Aug 5;177(3):163-4; author reply 165. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04712.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 12149092BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 12, 2010
First Posted
October 14, 2010
Study Start
April 1, 2010
Primary Completion
February 1, 2011
Study Completion
February 1, 2011
Last Updated
June 10, 2011
Record last verified: 2010-04