Comparing the Efficacy of Methylphenidate, Dextroamphetamine and Placebo in Children Diagnosed With ADHD
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The study compares the efficacy of methylphenidate, dextroamphetamine and placebo on neuropsychological functioning and behavioral symptoms in 36 children diagnosed with ADHD within a double-blind cross-over design over six weeks. The assessment of ADHD followed formalized guidelines and a diagnosis of ADHD was based on DSM-IV criteria. A neuropsychological testbattery and four behavioral questionnaires were selected as efficacy variables. The neuropsychological testbattery includes Qb-test (visual attention, inhibitory control, motor activity), Score (auditory attention), Stroop Test (processing speed, inhibitory control) and Grooved Pegboard (motor speed). The participants were tested once on each type of medication. The four questionnaires are: a)Side-Effects Rating Scale (completed by a parent at the end of each of the six weeks), b)Self-Report Questionnaire (completed by the child at the end of each of the six weeks), c)Parent and Teacher Questionnaire(completed by a parent and a teacher Monday till Friday through every week), Test Performance Questionnaire (completed by the child immediately after each of the three test sessions). Main hypothesis: A trial including both dextroamphetamine(Dex) and methylphenidate(Met) will provide better results than a trial including only Met. a)Met and Dex are efficient as treatment for ADHD compared to placebo, albeit Dex has moderately better effect compared to Met. b)At an individual level some of the participants will show positive response to one type of stimulants and no response, mixed response or adverse response to the other type of stimulant. c)Neuropsychological tests and behavioral questionnaires are moderately in agreement but also add unique information in the assessment of the effect of stimulants. d)Qb-test is sensitive and valid as a measure of the effect of stimulants.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Jan 2006
Typical duration for phase_4
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 28, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 14, 2010
CompletedOctober 14, 2010
October 1, 2010
2.9 years
September 28, 2010
October 13, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in ADHD and ODD symptoms
Parent and Teacher Questionnaire (completed monday till friday every week) Self-Report Questionnaire (completed once every week) Test Performance Questionnaire (completed by the child after each testsession)
Every week for six weeks
Change in attention, motor activity and executive functioning
QB test is a computer based continuous performance test (visual attention and motor activity). Score!from Test of Everyday Attention - Childrens Edition (auditory attention). C. Golden version of Stroop Test(prosessing-speed and inhibitory control). Grooved Pegboard from the Hallstead battery (motor speed).
The neuropsychological tests are administered once on each type of medication during the six week trial
Change in side-effects
Side-Effects Rating Scale (R. Barkley)
Once every week through the six week trial
Study Arms (1)
Methylphenidate, Dexamphetamine, Placebo
EXPERIMENTALThe 36 participants received each of the three medications for two weeks. Six different medication sequences are possible. The participants are randomly chosen for each of the six sequences in a way that allow six participants into each of the six sequences to balance the sequences.
Interventions
Placebo: 1 pill x 2 for one week, 2 pills x 2 for one week.
Dextroamphetamine: 5mg x 2 for one week, 10mg x 2 for one week
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age from 9.0 to 14.0.
- ADHD diagnosis following assessment at a child \& adolescent outpatient clinic.
- Clarification for stimulant treatment.
You may not qualify if:
- Moderate or severe mental retardation.
- Psychosis.
- Proven brain damage.
- Sensory deficits and/or motor impairments that make the individual in question unsuitable for the relevant tests.
- Epilepsy.
- The child has previously been prescribed stimulant medication or is being treated with such medication.
- The child commutes between parents or there are other factors that substantially reduce the possibility of obtaining reliable observations from parents (The child needs to live in one place through out the whole trial since otherwise might severely influence the child's behaviour and the observations).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ostfold Hospital Trustlead
- University of Oslocollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Ostfold Hospital Neuropsychiatric Unit
Fredrikstad, Østfold fylke, 1605, Norway
Østfold Hospital Neuropsychiatric Unit
Fredrikstad, Østfold fylke, 1605, Norway
Related Publications (2)
Ramtvedt BE, Aabech HS, Sundet K. Minimizing adverse events while maintaining clinical improvement in a pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder crossover trial with dextroamphetamine and methylphenidate. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2014 Apr;24(3):130-9. doi: 10.1089/cap.2013.0114. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
PMID: 24666268DERIVEDRamtvedt BE, Roinas E, Aabech HS, Sundet KS. Clinical gains from including both dextroamphetamine and methylphenidate in stimulant trials. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2013 Nov;23(9):597-604. doi: 10.1089/cap.2012.0085. Epub 2013 May 9.
PMID: 23659360DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Arne K. Henriksen, Phd
Ostfold Hospital Trust
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 28, 2010
First Posted
October 14, 2010
Study Start
January 1, 2006
Primary Completion
December 1, 2008
Study Completion
December 1, 2008
Last Updated
October 14, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-10