NCT01217333

Brief Summary

The investigators community based resource center has implemented visit preparation by prompting patients to write down their questions. This is a proven approach to increasing the number of questions and concerns that patients voice during their visits with doctors. The resource center's usual practice is to provide their visit preparation intervention, called Consultation Planning, through in-person counseling sessions. This study asks whether telephone delivery of Consultation Planning would be almost as effective in terms of increasing patient's decision self-efficacy, or confidence in their ability to navigate decisions effectively with their physicians. The study also asks about the cost-effectiveness of telephone delivery compared to in-person delivery. The investigators are answering these questions through a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial with two arms: in-person versus telephone delivery of Consultation Planning. The investigators are measuring self-reported psychological outcomes such as decision self-efficacy (primary outcome), preparation for decision making, anxiety, and distress, along with economic outcomes such as health resource utilization and willingness to pay. The investigators hypothesize that Tele-CP can be delivered at a lower patient and resource center cost than in-person CP, and that it will be as effective in terms of impact on a patient's decisional self-efficacy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
74

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable breast-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2007

Typical duration for not_applicable breast-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2007

Completed
3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 28, 2010

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 8, 2010

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2010

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

October 18, 2012

Status Verified

October 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

September 28, 2010

Last Update Submit

October 16, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

TelephonesCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchParticipation, PatientRural health services

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Decisional Self-Efficacy (DSE)

    -1 hour (1 hour prior to intervention)

  • Decisional Self-Efficacy (DSE)

    5 min after intervention

Secondary Outcomes (17)

  • CRCMC Client Intake Form

    Immediately upon consent

  • STAI Form Y-1 (Anxiety)

    -1 hour (1 hour prior to intervention)

  • Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS)

    -1 hour (1 hour prior to intervention)

  • Critical Incident Survey

    5 min (5 minutes after intervention)

  • Patient Intervention Costs

    5 min (5 minutes after intervention)

  • +12 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

In-person

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants in this arm have been randomized to receive Consultation Planning in-person

Behavioral: In-person CP

Telephone

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants in this arm have been randomized to receive Consultation Planning by telephone.

Behavioral: Tele-CP

Interventions

In-person CPBEHAVIORAL

CP is a structured interview in which a lay health worker prompts a patient to articulate questions and concerns about decision issues in preparation for a treatment discussion with a provider. The Consultation Planner (CPer) then completes and prints out a word-processed template, paraphrasing and summarizing the patient's questions and concerns. The patient takes away the printed Consultation Plan to serve as a visual aid and agenda during the meeting with the doctor. CPers are trained to avoid providing medical advice or information. Arrangements will be made for participants who do not have transportation to the CRCMC.

Also known as: SCOPED Model, Question listing
In-person
Tele-CPBEHAVIORAL

Participants in the Tele-CP arm will receive CP by telephone. Arrangements will be made for participants who do not have access to a telephone.

Also known as: SCOPED Model, Question listing
Telephone

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Females age 18 or older
  • Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) or local recurrence of DCIS
  • New (stage 1, 2, 3, 4) invasive breast cancer or recurrence
  • Upcoming appointment to see a surgeon or oncologist to discuss treatment options
  • Surgeons or oncologists whom the patient is consulting
  • Able to speak, read, and understand English or Spanish

You may not qualify if:

  • Females less than 18 years of age
  • Males with breast cancer
  • Females with breast cancer who are also pregnant (pregnancy changes the breast cancer treatment)
  • Clients who are determined to have "diminished mental capacity" according to the standards of the CRCMC Policy on Mental Competence

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Cancer Resource Centers of Mendocino County

Mendocino, California, 95460, United States

Location

Cancer Resource Centers of Mendocino County

Ukiah, California, 95482, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Belkora J, Stupar L, O'Donnell S, Loucks A, Moore D, Jupiter C, Johnson N, Wilson L. Decision support by telephone: randomized controlled trial in a rural community setting. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Oct;89(1):134-42. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.009. Epub 2012 Jul 7.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast NeoplasmsPatient Participation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesPatient Acceptance of Health CareTreatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Study Officials

  • Jeff Belkora, Ph.D.

    University of California, San Francisco

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor, Surgery and Health Policy Director, Decision Services

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 28, 2010

First Posted

October 8, 2010

Study Start

October 1, 2007

Primary Completion

December 1, 2010

Study Completion

June 1, 2011

Last Updated

October 18, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-10

Locations