Telephone-Based Decision Support for Rural Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
74
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The investigators community based resource center has implemented visit preparation by prompting patients to write down their questions. This is a proven approach to increasing the number of questions and concerns that patients voice during their visits with doctors. The resource center's usual practice is to provide their visit preparation intervention, called Consultation Planning, through in-person counseling sessions. This study asks whether telephone delivery of Consultation Planning would be almost as effective in terms of increasing patient's decision self-efficacy, or confidence in their ability to navigate decisions effectively with their physicians. The study also asks about the cost-effectiveness of telephone delivery compared to in-person delivery. The investigators are answering these questions through a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial with two arms: in-person versus telephone delivery of Consultation Planning. The investigators are measuring self-reported psychological outcomes such as decision self-efficacy (primary outcome), preparation for decision making, anxiety, and distress, along with economic outcomes such as health resource utilization and willingness to pay. The investigators hypothesize that Tele-CP can be delivered at a lower patient and resource center cost than in-person CP, and that it will be as effective in terms of impact on a patient's decisional self-efficacy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable breast-cancer
Started Oct 2007
Typical duration for not_applicable breast-cancer
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 28, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 8, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2011
CompletedOctober 18, 2012
October 1, 2012
3.2 years
September 28, 2010
October 16, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Decisional Self-Efficacy (DSE)
-1 hour (1 hour prior to intervention)
Decisional Self-Efficacy (DSE)
5 min after intervention
Secondary Outcomes (17)
CRCMC Client Intake Form
Immediately upon consent
STAI Form Y-1 (Anxiety)
-1 hour (1 hour prior to intervention)
Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS)
-1 hour (1 hour prior to intervention)
Critical Incident Survey
5 min (5 minutes after intervention)
Patient Intervention Costs
5 min (5 minutes after intervention)
- +12 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
In-person
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this arm have been randomized to receive Consultation Planning in-person
Telephone
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this arm have been randomized to receive Consultation Planning by telephone.
Interventions
CP is a structured interview in which a lay health worker prompts a patient to articulate questions and concerns about decision issues in preparation for a treatment discussion with a provider. The Consultation Planner (CPer) then completes and prints out a word-processed template, paraphrasing and summarizing the patient's questions and concerns. The patient takes away the printed Consultation Plan to serve as a visual aid and agenda during the meeting with the doctor. CPers are trained to avoid providing medical advice or information. Arrangements will be made for participants who do not have transportation to the CRCMC.
Participants in the Tele-CP arm will receive CP by telephone. Arrangements will be made for participants who do not have access to a telephone.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Females age 18 or older
- Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) or local recurrence of DCIS
- New (stage 1, 2, 3, 4) invasive breast cancer or recurrence
- Upcoming appointment to see a surgeon or oncologist to discuss treatment options
- Surgeons or oncologists whom the patient is consulting
- Able to speak, read, and understand English or Spanish
You may not qualify if:
- Females less than 18 years of age
- Males with breast cancer
- Females with breast cancer who are also pregnant (pregnancy changes the breast cancer treatment)
- Clients who are determined to have "diminished mental capacity" according to the standards of the CRCMC Policy on Mental Competence
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Cancer Resource Centers of Mendocino County
Mendocino, California, 95460, United States
Cancer Resource Centers of Mendocino County
Ukiah, California, 95482, United States
Related Publications (1)
Belkora J, Stupar L, O'Donnell S, Loucks A, Moore D, Jupiter C, Johnson N, Wilson L. Decision support by telephone: randomized controlled trial in a rural community setting. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Oct;89(1):134-42. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.009. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
PMID: 22776761RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeff Belkora, Ph.D.
University of California, San Francisco
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor, Surgery and Health Policy Director, Decision Services
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 28, 2010
First Posted
October 8, 2010
Study Start
October 1, 2007
Primary Completion
December 1, 2010
Study Completion
June 1, 2011
Last Updated
October 18, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-10