Study Stopped
the study was terminated for patient recruitment difficulty and interim power analysis
Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) vs. Inhaled Anesthesia for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.
Preliminary Study to Assess the Effects of Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Propofol/Remifentanyl Compared to Sevoflurane/Remifentanyl for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: Novel Approach.
1 other identifier
interventional
23
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare total intravenous anesthesia to inhaled anesthesia in endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic sinusitis. The investigators will compare bleeding during surgery, duration of surgery, blood flow to the nose and other parameters. The investigators hypothesize that total intravenous anesthesia decreases bleeding and improves the view during surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2010
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 4, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 4, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 1, 2021
CompletedNovember 1, 2021
October 1, 2021
2.4 years
August 4, 2010
October 1, 2021
October 1, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Volume of Blood Loss
Blood loss was determined by subtracting the volume of irrigation used intraoperatively from the total volume of fluid in the collection canisters.The Neptune Waste Management System will be used for this purpose. This is a closed suction system that digitally counts the amount of fluid suctioned.
during the surgery (from the moment of injection of local anesthetic in the nasal cavity to the end of application of local hemostatis agents, about 1 to 5 hours)
Number of Participants for Whom Surgical Field Visualization Was Deemed Severely Compromised
Surgeons rated the surgical field using the Boezaart score (which ranges from 0 to 5, with 5 indicating the most compromised surgical field), and this outcome measure reports the number of participants with a Boezaart score of 5. Boezaart scoring is as follows: 0 (No bleeding, cadaveric conditions); 1 (Slight bleeding, no suctioning required), 2 (Slight bleeding, occasional suctioning required; 3 (Slight bleeding, frequent suctioning required; bleeding threatens surgical field a few seconds after suction is removed); 4 (Moderate bleeding, frequent suctioning required, and bleeding threatens surgical field directly after suction is removed); 5 (Severe bleeding, constant suctioning required; bleeding appears faster than can be removed by suction; surgical field severely threatened and surgery usually not possible).
during the surgery (from the moment of injection of local anesthetic in the nasal cavity to the end of application of local hemostatis agents, about 1 to 5 hours)
Platelet Function as Assessed by Thromboelastography (TEG) Platelet Mapping (PM)
Thromboelastography-Platelet Mapping will be performed to assess the effect of the anesthetics on platelet function. Data are reported as Maximum Amplitude (MA) in millimeters (mm). A greater MA value indicates stronger clotting and greater platelet function.
baseline
Platelet Function as Assessed by Thromboelastography (TEG) Platelet Mapping (PM)
Thromboelastography-Platelet Mapping will be performed to assess the effect of the anesthetics on platelet function. Data are reported as Maximum Amplitude (MA) in millimeters (mm). A greater MA value indicates stronger clotting and greater platelet function.
During time in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (about 30 minutes to 1.5 hours)
Nasal Blood Flow to the Sinonasal Mucosa as Assessed by the Rhinolux System
The Rhinolux system was used to measure nasal blood flow (it assessed changes in the swelling of the nasal mucosa by a tissue light absorption technique similar to that used in pulse oximetry)--more negative optical density unit values indicate greater nasal blood flow and less light.
0-5 minutes after induction of anesthesia
Nasal Blood Flow to the Sinonasal Mucosa as Assessed by the Rhinolux System
The Rhinolux system was used to measure nasal blood flow (it assessed changes in the swelling of the nasal mucosa by a tissue light absorption technique similar to that used in pulse oximetry)--negative values indicate greater nasal blood flow and less light.
60-90 minutes after induction of anesthesia
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Duration of Surgery
during the surgery (from the moment of injection of local anesthetic in the nasal cavity to the end of application of local hemostatis agents, about 1 to 5 hours)
Quality of Recovery as Indicated by Pain Rating Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
During time in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (about 30 minutes to 1.5 hours)
Quality of Recovery as Indicated by Number of Participants With Nausea
During time in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (about 30 minutes to 1.5 hours)
Quality of Recovery as Indicated by Recovery Time in the PACU
During time in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (about 30 minutes to 1.5 hours)
Quality of Recovery as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Received an Analgesic Post-operatively
During time in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (about 30 minutes to 1.5 hours)
Study Arms (2)
Total Intravenous Anesthesia
EXPERIMENTALTotal Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and remifentanyl
Inhaled Anesthesia
ACTIVE COMPARATORInhaled anesthesia with sevoflurane and remifentanyl.
Interventions
Anesthesia will be induced with lidocaine 0.5 mg kg, propofol infusion at 250 mcg/kg/min (to reduce visual bias of propofol infusion) and total volume infused will be adjusted for an induction dose of 2-3 mg/kg before bolus of muscle relaxant, rocuronium 0.5 mg kg in both SR and PR groups. Remifentanil infusion will be started at a rate of 0.4 mcg/kg/min 1-2 minutes before the propofol infusion and a 100 ml 0.9% normal saline bag will be used to blind surgeons in the sevoflurane group. The target mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) will be maintained at 70-80 mm Hg by adjusting the propofol concentration within their range (100-150 mg ml for propofol) according to the anaesthesiologist's judgement and by surgeon request. If this failed, the remifentanil rate will be adjusted by 0.05 mg kg min.
Sevoflurane 1-3% will be administered in group SR, and the infusion of propofol will be stopped. After intubation remifentanil infusion will be changed to 0.2 mcg/kg/min. The target mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) will be maintained at 70-80 mm Hg by adjusting the sevoflurane concentration within their range (between 1-3 vol% for sevoflurane) according to the anaesthesiologist's judgement and by surgeon request.If this failed, the remifentanil rate will be adjusted by 0.05 mg kg min.In order to limit the amount of fluids remifentanil wil be diluted at a concentration of 4 mg in 100 ml.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis
- Indication by the surgeon of need for endoscopic sinus surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Memorial Hermann Hospital - Medical Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Davide Cattano, MD
- Organization
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Davide Cattano, MD PhD
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor - Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 4, 2010
First Posted
October 4, 2010
Study Start
May 1, 2010
Primary Completion
October 1, 2012
Study Completion
October 1, 2012
Last Updated
November 1, 2021
Results First Posted
November 1, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10