NCT01213420

Brief Summary

This study is a prospective, randomized controlled, double blinded, study in a multi centre setting. Three burn centres will include 60 patients in total. If suited for the study (= two equal donor sites) and after informed consent, patients will be observed starting the day of skin prelevation. A coded file will be made for each patient and these files should contain the localization of both donor sites, their depth as determined by the setting of the dermatome and the treatment. Treatment for both donor sites will always be equal. The date of wound healing of each donor site, which may only differ by a maximum of five days, will be noted. Digital photographs of the healed donor sites will be taken and the scars will be evaluated by the local researchers using the Adapted Vancouver Scar Scale prior to the start of hydration. From that moment on one donor site will be treated with Aruba Aloe formula F-BC-096 while one of the control products will be applied to the second site. Per group of five patients per centre a different control product will be applied to the second donor site. The tubes containing these products will be colour and numerical coded. Nor the treating personnel, nor the patients will be informed which colour tubes contain the control products and which contain the Aruba Aloe formula F-BC-096. If it is necessary to apply pressure garments for one donor site, the garments will be applied for both sites. Follow-Ups will be performed on one, three and six months after wound closure. Objective methods will be used during these follow-ups to evaluate elasticity and colour of the scar, this by using the Dermalab, the Cutometer®, the Derma Spectrometer and the Mexameter®. The evaporation, permeability and hydration of the scar will be measured by using the Tewameter® and the Corneometer®. The Reviscometer® will measure the direction of collagen and elastin. The Adapted Vancouver Scar Scale will be used as a subjective method. Also different scales for evaluation of donor site pain, patient satisfaction, product comfort, itching etc. have to be completed by the patient.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2010

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2010

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 30, 2010

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 4, 2010

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2011

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

June 14, 2012

Status Verified

June 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

September 30, 2010

Last Update Submit

June 13, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

Donor sites after wound closure

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • improvement in patients treated with Aruba Aloe Formula F-BC-096 compared to patients treated with the three comparators

    * The adapted Vancouver Scar Scale (1, 3 and 6 months after wound closure) * Measurement of the Trans Epidermal Water Loss with the Tewameter (1, 3 and 6 months after wound closure) * Measurement of the hydration of the stratum corneum with the Corneometer (1, 3 and 6 months after wound closure)

    after 6 months of scar hydration

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • improvement of overall scar quality in patients treated with Aruba Aloe Formula F-BC-096 compared to patients treated with the three comparators:

    after 6 months of scar hydration

  • improvement of overall product satisfaction in patients treated with Aruba Aloe Formula F-BC-096 compared to patients treated with the three comparators

    after 6 months of scar hydration

  • improvement of scar colour in patients treated with Aruba Aloe Formula F-BC-096 compared to patients treated with the three comparators

    after 6 months of scar hydration

  • improvement of scar elasticity in patients treated with Aruba Aloe Formula F-BC-096 compared to patients treated with the three comparators

    after 6 months of scar hydration

  • improvement of collagen and elastin direction in patients treated with Aruba Aloe Formula F-BC-096 compared to patients treated with the three comparators

    after 6 months of scar hydration

Study Arms (4)

Aloë Vera FORMULA F-BC-096

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: Aloë Vera FORMULA F-BC-096 for scar hydration

Aloë Vera FORMULA F-BC-096 with modified preservative

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Other: Aloë Vera with modified preservative for scar hydration

Eucerin Calming cream

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Other: Eucerin Calming cream for scar hydration

Nivea Cream

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Other: Nivea Cream for scar hydration

Interventions

3 applications per day during 6 months

Nivea Cream

3 applications per day during 6 months.

Aloë Vera FORMULA F-BC-096

3 applications per day during 6 months

Eucerin Calming cream

3 applications per day during 6 months

Aloë Vera FORMULA F-BC-096 with modified preservative

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients must have two similar donor sites regarding location, depth and wound treatment.
  • Healing time of both donor sites may differ by 5 days maximum.
  • Patient compliance with therapy in relation to the protocol is necessary. In case of paediatric patients this depends on the collaboration of the parents.
  • For the two donor sites to be compared, the entire after-treatment concerning pressure garments or eventual silicone sheets must be equal for both donor sites. Pressure garments and/or silicone sheets are used only in case of burn wounds within the same location.
  • Patients must be available for regular and necessary follow-up (up to 6 months post healing).
  • Possibility to finish all measurements during follow-up visits.
  • Written authorisation of the patient, family or parents is required.

You may not qualify if:

  • Donor sites are not similar (not identical in: depth, wound treatment, healing time).
  • The patient has a known allergy to Aloe Vera and/or to preservatives in cosmetic products.
  • The patient is not able to follow the complete treatment schedule.
  • The patient has any condition(s) that seriously compromises the patient's ability to complete this study.
  • The occurrence of a traumatic wound over the healed donor site (e.g. abrasion, skin tear, …)
  • The patient wishes to terminate the study.
  • No informed consent before start of the trial.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Hospital Network Antwerp

Antwerp, Belgium

Location

University Hospital Ghent

Ghent, Belgium

Location

Military Hospital

Neder-Over-Heembeek, Belgium

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Wounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Stan Monstrey, MD, PhD

    University Hospital Ghent, Belgium

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2010

First Posted

October 4, 2010

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion

January 1, 2011

Study Completion

September 1, 2011

Last Updated

June 14, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-06

Locations