NCT01211158

Brief Summary

When patients come to the Emergency Department with injuries and infections they often need to have painful procedures performed that are essential to allowing them to recover. To accomplish this, doctors often use "procedural sedation". This involves giving medications through an intravenous line in order to relieve the patient's pain and to make them drowsy while the painful procedure is being performed. This allows the medical staff to perform necessary procedures to patients without causing pain and anguish. There are several types of medications and combinations of medications that are used for procedural sedation. Each medication has its advantages and its disadvantages. Consequently, research is necessary to determine which medication or combination of medications is the most effective and the safest. This study will compare the use of one drug (Propofol) versus the use of a combination of Propofol with another drug (Ketamine). Both of these drugs are already used for procedural sedations in the emergency department but it is not known which of them is the best or the safest. The investigators believe that the combination of ketamine and propofol together will work as good or better than propofol alone and be a safer option as well. Propofol is a well known sedative that is used in many emergency departments and the clinical experience with it has been very good because it acts quickly and wears off quickly. However, propofol is not a good pain-killer and it can also cause patients to stop breathing. This is why monitoring a patient's breathing and vital signs is essential for any procedural sedation. It is known that ketamine is a good pain-killer and helps patients to maintain their breathing. Doctors sometimes use ketamine alone for procedural sedation but patients take a very long time to wake up when ketamine only is used. Thus, the investigators think that by combining ketamine with propofol the investigators can perform painful procedures using procedural sedation without causing patients to stop breathing as often as with propofol alone. Also, the ketamine the investigators use will help treat their pain and make them more comfortable. The investigators plan to enroll 284 patients over the course of about one year. The primary outcome of adverse respiratory events, as well as the secondary outcomes will be assessed during the course of the sedation and recovery period, approximately one hour. Quality of life score and pain will be assessed by telephone interview 3 days after the procedure.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
284

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2010

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 28, 2010

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 29, 2010

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2010

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

November 17, 2011

Status Verified

November 1, 2011

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

September 28, 2010

Last Update Submit

November 16, 2011

Conditions

Keywords

emergency departmentprocedural sedationketofolketaminepropofolconscious sedation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number and proportion of patients experiencing a respiratory adverse event as described by the Quebec Criteria

    Oxygen desaturation, central apnea, partial upper airway obstruction, complete upper airway obstruction, laryngospasm, clinically apparent pulmonary aspiration.

    1 hour

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • Quality of sedation

    During procedure - average time 5 - 10 minutes

  • Sedation complications

    During procedure and recovery period and before discharge - average time 1-2 hours

  • Post-procedural patient comfort

    72 hours post sedation

  • Hypotension

    During sedation and recovery - average time 30-45 minutes

  • Recovery agitation requiring treatment

    During recovery period - average time 30 - 45 minutes

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Propofol alone

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients receiving propofol alone.

Drug: Propofol alone

Ketofol

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

0.375 mg/kg each of ketamine and propofol (mixed in the same syringe) as an initial bolus and 0.188 mg/kg each of ketamine and propofol as necessary until reaching deep sedation (Ramsay score = 5 or greater).

Drug: Ketofol

Interventions

Syringes containing ketofol (mixed propofol-ketamine) will contain propofol 5mg/ml and ketamine 5 mg/ml. Patients will receive an initial intravenous dose of 0.075 millilitres per kilogram of pre-prepared medication. Patients in the propofol-ketamine group will receive 0.375 mg/kg each of ketamine and propofol as an initial bolus and 0.188 mg/kg each of ketamine and propofol as necessary until reaching deep sedation (Ramsay score = 5 or greater).

Also known as: single-syringe ketamine-propofol 1:1 combination
Ketofol

Propofol-only syringes will contain propofol 10 mg/ml. Patients in each group will receive an initial intravenous dose of 0.075 millilitres per kilogram of pre-prepared medication (0.75 mg/kg). One minute after the initial dose of sedative, and every minute thereafter, the attending physician will assess the patient's level of sedation using the Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS). If the attending physician determines the level of sedation to be inadequate (RSS\<5), additional study drug will be administered at a dose of 0.0375 millilitres per kilogram (0.375 mg/kg) every minute until deep sedation is achieved (RSS=5 or greater).

Also known as: Diprivan
Propofol alone

Eligibility Criteria

Age14 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • age 14 years or greater
  • deemed to require emergency department procedural sedation by the attending physician

You may not qualify if:

  • unable to give informed consent
  • hemodynamic instability
  • pregnancy
  • known allergy to either study medication

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Lions Gate Hospital

North Vancouver, British Columbia, V7L 2L7, Canada

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Bhatt M, Kennedy RM, Osmond MH, Krauss B, McAllister JD, Ansermino JM, Evered LM, Roback MG; Consensus Panel on Sedation Research of Pediatric Emergency Research Canada (PERC) and the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN). Consensus-based recommendations for standardizing terminology and reporting adverse events for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia in children. Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Apr;53(4):426-435.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.09.030. Epub 2008 Nov 20.

    PMID: 19026467BACKGROUND
  • Messenger DW, Murray HE, Dungey PE, van Vlymen J, Sivilotti ML. Subdissociative-dose ketamine versus fentanyl for analgesia during propofol procedural sedation: a randomized clinical trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Oct;15(10):877-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00219.x. Epub 2008 Aug 27.

    PMID: 18754820BACKGROUND
  • Miner JR, Gray RO, Stephens D, Biros MH. Randomized clinical trial of propofol with and without alfentanil for deep procedural sedation in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Sep;16(9):825-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00487.x.

    PMID: 19845550BACKGROUND
  • Miner JR. The surgical stress response, preemptive analgesia, and procedural sedation in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Oct;15(10):955-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00249.x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 18851717BACKGROUND
  • Arora S. Combining ketamine and propofol ("ketofol") for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia: a review. West J Emerg Med. 2008 Jan;9(1):20-3. No abstract available.

    PMID: 19561698BACKGROUND
  • Sharieff GQ, Trocinski DR, Kanegaye JT, Fisher B, Harley JR. Ketamine-propofol combination sedation for fracture reduction in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007 Dec;23(12):881-4. doi: 10.1097/pec.0b013e31815c9df6.

    PMID: 18091596BACKGROUND
  • Andolfatto G, Willman E. A prospective case series of pediatric procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department using single-syringe ketamine-propofol combination (ketofol). Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;17(2):194-201. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00646.x.

  • Willman EV, Andolfatto G. A prospective evaluation of "ketofol" (ketamine/propofol combination) for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Jan;49(1):23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.08.002. Epub 2006 Oct 23.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Emergencies

Interventions

Propofol

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Disease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic Chemicals

Study Officials

  • Gary Andolfatto, MD

    Lions Gate Hospital, University of British Columbia Department of Emergency Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 28, 2010

First Posted

September 29, 2010

Study Start

December 1, 2010

Primary Completion

September 1, 2011

Study Completion

September 1, 2011

Last Updated

November 17, 2011

Record last verified: 2011-11

Locations