Study Stopped
The protocol finished.
Study of the Effect of FLUTTER® VRP1 (PEP and Oscillating High Frequency).
FLUTTER®VRP1
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The research sought to assess the effects of Flutter ® VRP1 in patients with bronchiectasis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started Jul 2007
Typical duration for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 12, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 27, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2010
CompletedJune 28, 2012
September 1, 2010
6 months
July 12, 2010
June 26, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Effect of FLUTTER VRP1 on respiratory mucus transport
30 patients with bronchiectasis will receive sessions with the Flutter®VRP1 or PEP for 30 minutes daily in a randomized, crossover study. Weekly secretion samples will be collected and evaluated for mucociliary relative transport velocity(RTV), displacement in a simulated cough machine(SCM) and contact angle measurement(CAM).
five years
Study Arms (4)
Flutter group
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn Flutter group the exercise used the Flutter ®VRP1 (VarioRaw SA, Switzerland).
PEP group
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn PEP group the exercise used the Flutter ®VRP1 (VarioRaw SA, Switzerland) without the steel ball inside, with the closure of so many holes as necessary to produce a positive expiratory pressure equivalent to pressure achieved by patients during the performance with the ball in the Flutter®VRP1.
control group
PLACEBO COMPARATORIn placebo patients were assessed as pulmonary function, respiratory muscle strength and transport properties of respiratory secretions
Group Sham
SHAM COMPARATORExercise with Flutter®VRP1 without the ball inside
Interventions
In placebo patients were assessed and were not subjected to any respiratory physical therapy technique.
Patients have done exercise sessions with Flutter ®VRP1 for 30 minutes daily in a randomized, crossover, with four weeks of treatment with a therapy, a week of wash-out followed by four more weeks with the other modality (PEP).
Patients have done exercise sessions with Flutter® VRP1 without the steel ball inside, with the closure of so many holes as necessary to produce a positive expiratory pressure equivalent to pressure achieved by patients during the performance with the ball in the Flutter®VRP1 for 30 minutes daily in a randomized, crossover, with four weeks of treatment with a therapy, a week of wash-out followed by four more weeks with the other modality (Flutter®VRP1).
Patients have done exercise sessions with Flutter ®VRP1 for 30 minutes without the ball inside daily in a randomized, crossover, with four weeks of treatment with a therapy, a week of wash-out followed by four more weeks with the other modality (PEP)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Non Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis
- Amount of secretion sufficient for analysis
- Capable of fulfilling the experimental protocol
You may not qualify if:
- Acute pulmonary disease
- Presence of any respiratory infection in the last four weeks
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of Sao Paulo
Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14049-900, Brazil
Related Publications (4)
App EM, Kieselmann R, Reinhardt D, Lindemann H, Dasgupta B, King M, Brand P. Sputum rheology changes in cystic fibrosis lung disease following two different types of physiotherapy: flutter vs autogenic drainage. Chest. 1998 Jul;114(1):171-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.114.1.171.
PMID: 9674466RESULTFahy JV, Schuster A, Ueki I, Boushey HA, Nadel JA. Mucus hypersecretion in bronchiectasis. The role of neutrophil proteases. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992 Dec;146(6):1430-3. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/146.6.1430.
PMID: 1280928RESULTThompson CS, Harrison S, Ashley J, Day K, Smith DL. Randomised crossover study of the Flutter device and the active cycle of breathing technique in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Thorax. 2002 May;57(5):446-8. doi: 10.1136/thorax.57.5.446.
PMID: 11978924RESULTTambascio J, de Souza HCD, Martinez R, Baddini-Martinez JA, Barnes PJ, Gastaldi AC. Effects of an Airway Clearance Device on Inflammation, Bacteriology, and Mucus Transport in Bronchiectasis. Respir Care. 2017 Aug;62(8):1067-1074. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05214.
PMID: 28733314DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Ada C. Gastaldi, doctor
University of Sao Paulo
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor Ada Clarice Gastaldi
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 12, 2010
First Posted
September 27, 2010
Study Start
July 1, 2007
Primary Completion
January 1, 2008
Study Completion
December 1, 2010
Last Updated
June 28, 2012
Record last verified: 2010-09