NCT01209091

Brief Summary

Introduction: Many reimbursement authorities use economic evaluation to help guide decisions regarding the adoption of new treatments in reimbursement systems. Survival and quality of life are often the main measure of benefit used in an economic evaluation - expressed as a quality adjusted life year (QALY). In addition though, some decision makers will also consider the impact of a treatment on a patient's ability to continue working (expressed in terms of productivity). The aim of the present study is to estimate quality of life weights (utilities) and productivity loss for women with metastatic breast cancer (Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 positive or HER 2+). Methods: Separate surveys will be used to assess utilities and productivity in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC). To capture utilities health state descriptions or vignettes describing progressive disease, stable disease, and seven grade 3/4 adverse events (diarrhoea, fatigue, anaemia, leukopenia, anorexia, decreases in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and skin rash) will be developed. The vignettes will be developed based on a literature review and in depth interviews with women with MBC in the Netherlands and Sweden. Clinical experts in both countries will review the health states for content validity. The health states will be translated using forward and back translation. Members of the general public will rate the states (100 men and women in NL; 100 women aged 50+ in Sweden) using the visual analogue scale and Time Trade Off method to determine utility values. In a separate survey women who are currently being treated or have recently completed their treatment for MBC will be surveyed regarding the impact of disease on their ability to work using a validated work productivity measure (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment) in women in the Netherlands and Sweden.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2009

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2009

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2009

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2009

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 30, 2010

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 27, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

February 3, 2016

Status Verified

February 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

August 30, 2010

Last Update Submit

February 1, 2016

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Health utility: is a measure of strength of preference that people have for particular health states. A year in full health is arbitrarily assigned a value of 1: a state that is considered equivalent to death is assigned a value of zero

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Productivity loss: productive working time lost due to health related inability to work. These include the costs of lost work due to absenteeism or early retirement, impaired productivity at work, and lost or impaired leisure activity.

Study Arms (1)

No treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

A hundred members of the general public will be recruited in the Netherlands and in Sweden to participate in time trade off (TTO) interviews. In Sweden in order to try to match the socio-demographic profile of women suffering from HER2+ MBC, recruitment will be aimed at females aged over 50. In the Netherlands participants will be from both genders, and of mixed age, ethnicity, education and employment status categories. In Sweden, interviews will be conducted in Stockholm, Tyresö and Malmo. In the Netherlands, interviews will be conducted in Rotterdam, Amsterdam and Colmschate.

You may qualify if:

  • Age \> 18

You may not qualify if:

  • N/A

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Officials

  • GSK Clinical Trials

    GlaxoSmithKline

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 30, 2010

First Posted

September 27, 2010

Study Start

August 1, 2009

Primary Completion

October 1, 2009

Study Completion

October 1, 2009

Last Updated

February 3, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-02