GSK1322322 Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection
A Randomized, Double Blind, Double Dummy Multicenter Phase IIa Study to Assess Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of GSK1322322 Versus Linezolid in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection
1 other identifier
interventional
84
1 country
7
Brief Summary
This study will determine the safety, tolerability and efficacy of GSK1322322 verses Linezolid in subjects with Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection (ABSSSI).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Aug 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 17, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 14, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 24, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 18, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 18, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 4, 2017
CompletedDecember 4, 2017
September 1, 2017
5 months
September 14, 2010
September 22, 2017
October 25, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (24)
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, may jeopardize the participant or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in this definition, associated with liver injury and impaired liver function defined as alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \>=3 x upper limit of normal (ULN), and total bilirubin \>=2 x ULN or international normalised ratio \>1.5.
Up to Follow-up (28 Day Follow-up, Day 40)
Mean Clinical Chemistry Parameters of Albumin and Total Protein at Indicated Time Points
Blood samples were obtained for analysis of albumin and total protein at Day 1, Day 4, Day 8, Day 11, 7 Day Follow-up and 28 Day Follow-up. Baseline value was defined as the assessment done on Day 1.
Up to Follow-up (28 Day Follow-up, Day 40)
Mean Clinical Chemistry Parameters of ALT, Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) and Creatine Kinase at Indicated Time Points
Blood samples were obtained for analysis of ALT, ALP, AST, FSH, GGT, LDH and creatine kinase at Day 1, Day 4, Day 8, Day 11, 7 Day Follow-up and 28 Day Follow-up. Baseline value was defined as the assessment done on Day 1.
Up to Follow-up (28 Day Follow-up, Day 40)
Mean Clinical Chemistry Parameters of Creatinine, Uric Acid, Direct Bilirubin and Total Bilirubin at Indicated Time Points
Blood samples were obtained for analysis of creatinine, uric acid, direct bilirubin and total bilirubin at Day 1, Day 4, Day 8, Day 11, 7 Day Follow-up and 28 Day Follow-up. Baseline value was defined as the assessment done on Day 1.
Up to Follow-up (28 Day Follow-up, Day 40)
Mean Clinical Chemistry Parameters of Glucose, Sodium, Calcium, Potassium, Chloride, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Content /Bicarbonate and Urea/ Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) at Indicated Time Points
Blood samples were obtained for analysis of glucose, sodium, calcium, potassium, chloride, CO2 content /bicarbonate and urea/BUN at Day 1, Day 4, Day 8, Day 11, 7 Day Follow-up and 28 Day Follow-up. Baseline value was defined as the assessment done on Day 1.
Up to Follow-up (28 Day Follow-up, Day 40)
Mean Clinical Chemistry Parameter of Estradiol at Indicated Time Point
Blood samples were obtained for analysis of estradiol at Day 1.
Day 1
Mean Clinical Chemistry Parameter of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein at Indicated Time Points
Blood samples were obtained for analysis of high sensitivity C-Reactive protein at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 8, Day 11 and 7 Day Follow-up. Baseline value was defined as the assessment done on Day 1.
Up to Follow-up (7 Day Follow-up, Day 19)
Mean Hematology Parameters of Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Total Neutrophils, White Blood Cells (WBC) and Platelet Count at Indicated Time Points
Blood samples were obtained for analysis of basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, total neutrophils, WBC and platelet count at Day 1, Day 4, Day 8, Day 11, 7 Day Follow-up and 28 Day Follow-up. Baseline value was defined as the assessment done on Day 1.
Up to Follow-up (28 Day Follow-up, Day 40)
Mean Hematology Parameter of Mean Corpuscle Volume (MCV) at Indicated Time Points
Blood samples were obtained for analysis of MCV at Day 1, Day 4, Day 8, Day 11, 7 Day Follow-up and 28 Day Follow-up. Baseline value was defined as the assessment done on Day 1.
Up to Follow-up (28 Day Follow-up, Day 40)
Mean Hematology Parameter of Hemoglobin, Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) at Indicated Time Points
Blood samples were obtained for analysis of MCHC at Day 1, Day 4, Day 8, Day 11, 7 Day Follow-up and 28 Day Follow-up. Baseline value was defined as the assessment done on Day 1.
Up to Follow-up (28 Day Follow-up, Day 40)
Mean Hematology Parameter of Mean Corpuscle Hemoglobin (MCH) at Indicated Time Points
Blood samples were obtained for analysis of MCH at Day 1, Day 4, Day 8, Day 11, 7 Day Follow-up and 28 Day Follow-up. Baseline value was defined as the assessment done on Day 1.
Up to Follow-up (28 Day Follow-up, Day 40)
Mean Hematology Parameter of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count and Reticulocyte Count at Indicated Time Points
Blood samples were obtained for analysis of RBC count and reticulocyte at Day 1, Day 4, Day 8, Day 11, 7 Day Follow-up and 28 Day Follow-up. Baseline value was defined as the assessment done on Day 1.
Up to Follow-up (28 Day Follow-up, Day 40)
Mean Vital Sign Value of Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Indicated Time Points
Vital sign assessments were conducted at Day 1 (pre-dose), Day 2 (pre-dose), Day 3 (pre-dose), Day 4 (4-12 hours post-dose), Day 8 (pre-dose) and Day 11. The assessments were made with the participant in a semi-supine position, having rested in that position for at least 10 minutes beforehand. Three BP measurements were taken at pre-dose on Day 1. The mean value recorded at pre-dose was classified as Baseline. Single BP was obtained at all other time points during the study.
Up to Day 11
Mean Vital Sign Value of Heart Rate (HR) at Indicated Time Points
Vital sign assessments were conducted at Day 1 (pre-dose), Day 2 (pre-dose), Day 3 (pre-dose), Day 4 (4-12 hours post-dose), Day 8 (pre-dose) and Day 11. The assessments were made with the participant in a semi-supine position, having rested in that position for at least 10 minutes beforehand. Three HR measurements were taken at pre-dose on Day 1. The mean value recorded at pre-dose was classified as Baseline. Single HR was obtained at all other time points during the study.
Up to Day 11
Mean Vital Sign Value of Respiratory Rate (RR) at Indicated Time Points
Vital sign assessments were conducted at Day 1 (pre-dose), Day 2 (pre-dose), Day 3 (pre-dose), Day 4 (4-12 hours post-dose), Day 8 (pre-dose) and Day 11. The assessments were made with the participant in a semi-supine position, having rested in that position for at least 10 minutes beforehand. Three RR measurements were taken at pre-dose on Day 1. The mean value recorded at pre-dose was classified as Baseline. Single RR was obtained at all other time points during the study.
Up to Day 11
Mean Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP at Indicated Time Points
Vital sign assessments were conducted at Day 1 (pre-dose), Day 2 (pre-dose), Day 3 (pre-dose), Day 4 (4-12 hours post-dose), Day 8 (pre-dose) and Day 11. The assessments were made with the participant in a semi-supine position, having rested in that position for at least 10 minutes beforehand. Three BP measurements were taken at pre-dose on Day 1. The mean value recorded at pre-dose was classified as Baseline. Single BP was obtained at all other time points during the study. The change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-Baseline (Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 8 and Day 11) values. If either the Baseline or post-Baseline value was missing, the change from Baseline was set to missing as well.
Day 1 (Baseline) up to Day 11
Mean Change From Baseline in HR at Indicated Time Points
Vital sign assessments were conducted at Day 1 (pre-dose), Day 2 (pre-dose), Day 3 (pre-dose), Day 4 (4-12 hours post-dose), Day 8 (pre-dose) and Day 11. The assessments were made with the participant in a semi-supine position, having rested in that position for at least 10 minutes beforehand. Three HR measurements were taken at pre-dose on Day 1. The mean value recorded at pre-dose was classified as Baseline. Single HR was obtained at all other time points during the study. The change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-Baseline (Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 8 and Day 11) values. If either the Baseline or post-Baseline value was missing, the change from Baseline was set to missing as well.
Day 1 (Baseline) up to Day 11
Mean Change From Baseline in RR at Indicated Time Points
Vital sign assessments were conducted at Day 1 (pre-dose), Day 2 (pre-dose), Day 3 (pre-dose), Day 4 (4-12 hours post-dose), Day 8 (pre-dose) and Day 11. The assessments were made with the participant in a semi-supine position, having rested in that position for at least 10 minutes beforehand. Three RR measurements were taken at pre-dose on Day 1. The mean value recorded at pre-dose was classified as Baseline. Single RR was obtained at all other time points during the study. The change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-Baseline (Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 8 and Day 11) values. If either the Baseline or post-Baseline value was missing, the change from Baseline was set to missing as well.
Day 1 (Baseline) up to Day 11
Mean Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values at Indicated Time Points
12-lead ECGs were obtained during the study using an ECG machine that automatically calculated the heart rate and measured PR, QRS, RR, QT, and QTc intervals. It was performed with the participant in a semi-supine position having rested in that position for at least 10 minutes beforehand. Three measurements were taken at pre-dose on Day 1 at least 5 minutes apart. The mean PR interval, RR interval, QRS duration, uncorrected QT interval (UncQT) and QTcB (QT corrected by Bazett's formula) and QTcF (corrected by Friedericia's formula) was calculated from automated ECG readings. The assessments were done at Day 1 (pre-dose, 0.25-1.5 hours post-initial dose and 1.5-3 hours post-initial dose), Day 4 (4-12 hours post-morning dose), Day 8 (pre-morning dose) and Day 11 (0 hour). The mean value recorded pre-dose on Day 1 was classified as Baseline.
Up to Day 11
Mean Change From Baseline in ECG Values at Indicated Time Points
12-lead ECGs were obtained during the study using an ECG machine that automatically calculated the heart rate and measured PR, QRS, RR, QT, and QTc intervals. It was performed with the participant in a semi-supine position having rested in that position for at least 10 minutes beforehand. Three measurements were taken at pre-dose on Day 1 at least 5 minutes apart. The mean PR interval, RR interval, QRS duration, uncorrected QT interval (UncQT) and QTcB (QT corrected by Bazett's formula) and QTcF (corrected by Friedericia's formula) was calculated from automated ECG readings. The assessments were done at Day 1 (pre-dose, 0.25-1.5 hours post-initial dose and 1.5-3 hours post-initial dose), Day 4 (4-12 hours post-morning dose), Day 8 (pre-morning dose) and Day 11 (0 hour). Mean value recorded pre-dose on Day 1 was classified as Baseline. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from individual post-Baseline (Day 1 post-dose, Day 4, Day 8 and Day 11) values.
Day 1 (pre-dose, Baseline) up to Day 11
Mean ECG Rhythms at Indicated Time Points
12-lead ECGs were obtained during the study using an ECG machine that automatically calculated the heart rhythm and measured PR, QRS, RR, QT, and QTc intervals. It was performed with the participant in a semi-supine position having rested in that position for at least 10 minutes beforehand. Three measurements were taken at pre-dose on Day 1 at least 5 minutes apart and the mean of the three measurements was calculated. The assessments were done at Day 1 (pre-dose, 0.25-1.5 hours post-initial dose and 1.5-3 hours post-initial dose), Day 4 (4-12 hours post-morning dose), Day 8 (pre-morning dose) and Day 11 (0 hour).
Up to Day 11
Mean Change From Baseline in ECG Rhythms at Indicated Time Points
12-lead ECGs were obtained during the study using an ECG machine that automatically calculated the heart rhythm and measured PR, QRS, RR, QT, and QTc intervals. It was performed with the participant in a semi-supine position having rested in that position for at least 10 minutes beforehand. Three measurements were taken at pre-dose on Day 1 at least 5 minutes apart and the mean of the three measurements was calculated. The assessments were done at Day 1 (pre-dose, 0.25-1.5 hours post-initial dose and 1.5-3 hours post-initial dose), Day 4 (4-12 hours post-morning dose), Day 8 (pre-morning dose) and Day 11 (0 hour). The value recorded pre-dose on Day 1 was the Baseline. The change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-Baseline (Day 1 post-dose, Day 4, Day 8 and Day 11) values.
Day 1 (pre-dose, Baseline) up to Day 11
Number of Participants With Abnormal Transition From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Values Relative to Normal Range
The parameters of clinical chemistry included albumin, total protein, ALT, ALP, AST, GGT, LDH and creatine kinase, creatinine, uric acid, direct bilirubin, total bilirubin, glucose, sodium, calcium, potassium, chloride, CO2 content /bicarbonate and urea/BUN and high sensitivity C-Reactive protein. The assessments were done at Day 1, Day 4, Day 8, Day 11, 7 Day Follow-up and 28 Day Follow-up. Baseline was defined as the assessment done on Day 1 (pre-dose). Data is reported for number of participants with abnormal transition from Baseline 'to high' or 'to low' relative to normal range. Only those parameters for which at least one value of abnormal transition was reported are summarized.
Day 1 (pre-dose, Baseline) up Follow-up (28 Day Follow-up, Day 40)
Number of Participants With Abnormal Transition From Baseline in Hematology Values Relative to Normal Range
The parameters of clinical chemistry included basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, total neutrophils, WBC count, platelet count, MCV, hemoglobin, MCHC, MCH, RBC count and reticulocyte count. The assessments were done at Day 1, Day 4, Day 8, Day 11, 7 Day Follow-up and 28 Day Follow-up. Baseline was defined as the assessment done on Day 1 (pre-dose). Data is reported for number of participants with abnormal transition from Baseline 'to high' or 'to low' relative to normal range. Only those parameters for which at least one value of abnormal transition was reported are summarized.
Day 1 (pre-dose, Baseline) up Follow-up (28 Day Follow-up, Day 40)
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Number of Participants With Clinical Success of Clinical Response
Up to Follow-up (28 Day Follow-up, Day 40)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success of Clinical Outcome
Day 11 (end of therapy) and Follow-up (7 Day Follow-up, Day 19)
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success of Microbiological Outcome at End of Therapy
Day 11 (end of therapy)
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success of Microbiological Outcome at Follow-up
Follow-up (7 Day Follow-up, Day 19)
Percentage of Participants With Therapeutic Success of Therapeutic Outcome
Follow-up (7 day Follow-up, Day 19)
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Regimen 1
EXPERIMENTALGSK1322322 1500mg and Placebo Linezolid given twice a day (BID) for 10 days
Regimen 2
ACTIVE COMPARATORLinezolid 600mg and placebo GSK1322322 given BID for 10 days
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female subject age 18 years or older at the time of signing the informed consent
- Male subjects must agree to use one of the contraception methods listed
- A female is eligible to enter and participate in this study if she is of non-childbearing potential
- The subject has a diagnosis of ABSSSI defined as one of the following: wound infection with cellulitis that has developed within 30 days of surgery or trauma; abscess with cellulitis, or cellulitis that has developed in no more than 7 days before enrollment with worsening over the past 48 hours OR in the investigator's opinion the patient's condition warrants systemic oral antibiotic therapy
- The subject has at least 2 additional signs and symptoms of skin infection: purulence, erythema with or without induration, fluctuation, heat/localized warmth, and pain/tenderness
- The subject has at least 1 systemic marker of infection: Lymphadenopathy, Fever (\>38 degrees Celsius), White Blood Cell elevation, or Creatinine Reactive Protein (CRP) \>Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
- The subject has given written, informed, dated consent to participate in the study
- QTcB or QTcF \< 450 msec; or QTc \< 480 msec in subjects with Bundle Branch Block
- Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \< 2xULN; and bilirubin \< 1.0xULN
You may not qualify if:
- Current or chronic history of liver disease, or known hepatic or biliary abnormalities
- The subject has been diagnosed with Acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS)
- Body mass index (BMI) \>40 kg/m2
- The subject has demonstrated a previous hypersensitivity reaction to GSK1322322, or to oxazolidinones
- The subject has a secondarily infected animal/human bite
- The subject has a chronic ulcerative lesion that is likely to be polymicrobial or caused by anaerobic organisms and unlikely to have Staphylococcus aureus or Streptococcus pyogenes as the causative agent
- The subject has an underlying skin disease, such as pre-existing eczematous dermatitis, with clinical evidence of secondary infection
- The subject has an infection that would normally have a high cure rate after surgical incision alone
- The subject has a bacterial skin infection which, due to the extent, depth or severity of clinical presentation, in the opinion of the investigator, cannot be appropriately treated by an oral antibiotic
- The subject has received more than one dose of treatment with a systemic and/or topical antibacterial within 7 days
- The subject is currently receiving vasopressors
- The subject is currently receiving adrenergic agents
- The subject is currently receiving serotonergic reuptake inhibitors
- The subject is currently receiving monoamine oxidase inhibitors
- The subject has a documented clinical history of pseudomembranous colitis
- +8 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKlinelead
Study Sites (7)
GSK Investigational Site
Anniston, Alabama, 36207, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Chula Vista, California, 91911, United States
GSK Investigational Site
La Mesa, California, 91942, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Long Beach, California, 90813, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Oceanside, California, 92056, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813, United States
GSK Investigational Site
West Reading, Pennsylvania, 19611, United States
Related Publications (1)
Corey R, Naderer OJ, O'Riordan WD, Dumont E, Jones LS, Kurtinecz M, Zhu JZ. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of GSK1322322 in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Nov;58(11):6518-27. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03360-14. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
PMID: 25136015DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- GSK Response Center
- Organization
- GlaxoSmithKline
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
GSK Clinical Trials
GlaxoSmithKline
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 14, 2010
First Posted
September 24, 2010
Study Start
August 17, 2010
Primary Completion
January 18, 2011
Study Completion
January 18, 2011
Last Updated
December 4, 2017
Results First Posted
December 4, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.