Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Magnesium and Fentanyl Added to Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgery
The Effects of Intrathecal Magnesium and Fentanyl Added to Bupivacaine on Postoperative Analgesic Requirement in Patients Undergoing Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Magnesium has been suggested that NMDA (N-methyl D-aspartate)receptor antagonists induce preemptive analgesia when administrated before tissue injury , thus decreasing the subsequent sensation of pain. Following Ethics Committee approval and informed patients consent, Ninety patients 20-60 yr old ASA physical status I or II, scheduled for femur surgery under spinal anesthesia, were studied in a prospective, double-blinded, randomized way. The patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups of 30 each. The magnesium group (groupM) received bupivacaine 15mg combined with 0.5ml magnesium 10%,the fentanyl group (group F) received bupivacaine 15mg combined with0.5 ml fentanyl\[25microgram\] and the placebo group (group P) received bupivacaine 15mg combined with 0.5ml distilled water intrathecally . Time to first requirement of analgesic supplement, Sensory block onset time, maximum sensory level , onset of motor block, duration of blockade, hemodynamics variables, the incidence of hypotension, ephedrine requirements, bradycardia ,hypoxemia \[Saturation of peripheral oxygen (SpO2)\<90\], postoperative analgesic requirements and Adverse events, such as sedation, dizziness , Pruritus and postoperative nausea and vomiting were recorded. Patients were instructed preoperatively in the use of the verbal rating scale (VRS) from 0 to 10 (0no pain, 10maximum imaginable pain) for pain assessment. If the VRS exceeded four and the patient requested a supplement analgesic, methadon5 mg intravenously , was to be given for post-operative pain relief as needed .
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Aug 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 20, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 21, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2011
CompletedOctober 11, 2012
October 1, 2012
4 months
September 20, 2010
October 10, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Time to first requirement of analgesic supplement
analgesic administration was initiated by patient request(verbal rating scale\[ VRS\]\>4)
time to first requirement of analgesic supplement from the time of injection intrathecal anesthetic solution
postoperative analgesic requirements
postoperative analgesic requirements will be assessed by verbal rating scale (VRS) from 0 to 10 (0no pain, 10maximum imaginable pain).Each administration was initiated by patient request( VRS\>4)
12 hours postoperative
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Sensory block onset time will be assessed by a pinprick test
sensory block will be assessed by pinprick test every 10 seconds following intrathecal injection
duration of sensory block will be assessed by a pinprick test
sensory block will be assessed by pinprick test every 5 minuts following intrathecal injection
the onset of motor block will be assessed by the modified Bromage score
every10 seconds following intrathecal injection
duration of motor block will be assessed by the modified Bromage score
every 5 minuts following intrathecal injection
hemodynamic variables is assessed by noninvasive automatic blood pressure measurement and electrocardiogram monitoring
5min before the intrathecal injection
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
fentanyl
ACTIVE COMPARATORNinety patients 20-60 yr old American Society of Anesthesiologists ( ASA) physical status I or II, scheduled for femur surgery under spinal anesthesia, were studied in a prospective, double-blinded, randomized way. The patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups of 30 each. The magnesium group (groupM) received bupivacaine 15mg combined with 0.5ml magnesium 10%,The fentanyl group (group F) received bupivacaine 15mg combined with0.5 ml fentanyl\[25microgram\] and The placebo group (group P) received bupivacaine 15mg combined with 0.5ml distilled water(intrathecally) for each three groups 5 minutes prior to surgery)
placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORNinety patients 20-60 yr old American Society of Anesthesiologists ( ASA) physical status I or II, scheduled for femur surgery under spinal anesthesia, were studied in a prospective, double-blinded, randomized way. The patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups of 30 each. The magnesium group (groupM) received bupivacaine 15mg combined with 0.5ml magnesium 10%,The fentanyl group (group F) received bupivacaine 15mg combined with0.5 ml fentanyl\[25microgram\] and The placebo group (group P) received bupivacaine 15mg combined with 0.5ml distilled water(intrathecally) for each three groups 5 minutes prior to surgery)
magnesium sulphate
ACTIVE COMPARATORNinety patients 20-60 yr old American Society of Anesthesiologists ( ASA) physical status I or II, scheduled for femur surgery under spinal anesthesia, were studied in a prospective, double-blinded, randomized way. The patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups of 30 each. The magnesium group (groupM) received bupivacaine 15mg combined with 0.5ml magnesium 10%,The fentanyl group (group F) received bupivacaine 15mg combined with0.5 ml fentanyl\[25microgram\] and The placebo group (group P) received bupivacaine 15mg combined with 0.5ml distilled water(intrathecally) for each three groups 5 minutes prior to surgery)
Interventions
Ninety patients 20-60 yr old American Society of Anesthesiologists ( ASA) physical status I or II, scheduled for femur surgery under spinal anesthesia, were studied in a prospective, double-blinded, randomized way. The patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups of 30 each. The magnesium group (groupM) received bupivacaine 15mg combined with 0.5ml magnesium 10%,The fentanyl group (group F) received bupivacaine 15mg combined with0.5 ml fentanyl\[25microgram\] and The placebo group (group P) received bupivacaine 15mg combined with 0.5ml distilled water(intrathecally) for each three groups 5 minutes prior to surgery)
Ninety patients 20-60 yr old American Society of Anesthesiologists ( ASA) physical status I or II, scheduled for femur surgery under spinal anesthesia, were studied in a prospective, double-blinded, randomized way. The patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups of 30 each. The magnesium group (groupM) received bupivacaine 15mg combined with 0.5ml magnesium 10%,The fentanyl group (group F) received bupivacaine 15mg combined with0.5 ml fentanyl\[25microgram\] and The placebo group (group P) received bupivacaine 15mg combined with 0.5ml distilled water(intrathecally) for each three groups 5 minutes prior to surgery)
Ninety patients 20-60 yr old American Society of Anesthesiologists ( ASA) physical status I or II, scheduled for femur surgery under spinal anesthesia, were studied in a prospective, double-blinded, randomized way. The patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups of 30 each. The magnesium group (groupM) received bupivacaine 15mg combined with 0.5ml magnesium 10%,The fentanyl group (group F) received bupivacaine 15mg combined with0.5 ml fentanyl\[25microgram\] and The placebo group (group P) received bupivacaine 15mg combined with 0.5ml distilled water(intrathecally) for each three groups 5 minutes prior to surgery)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) physical status I and
- II, undergoing elective femur surgery
You may not qualify if:
- significant coexisting disease such as hepato-renal and cardiovascular disease
- any contraindication to regional anesthesia such as local infection or ''''bleeding disorders
- allergy to opioids
- long-term opioid use
- history of chronic pain.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Qazvin university of medical science
Qazvin, Qazvin Province, 34197/59811, Iran
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marzieh Beigom Khezri, assistant professor
Qazvin medical science university
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Qazvin University Of Medical Sciences
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 20, 2010
First Posted
September 21, 2010
Study Start
August 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2010
Study Completion
January 1, 2011
Last Updated
October 11, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-10