NCT01205594

Brief Summary

Briefly, after the induction of anesthesia and the placement of TEE, hemodynamic variables (pulmonary and systemic blood pressure, central and pulmonary venous pressure, cardiac output, calculated SVR, etc.) will be collected. In addition, left ventricular performance (including estimates of LVEDV, LVESV, EF, FAC, etc.) will be assessed using TEE. Once these baseline data are recorded, the ITPR will be inserted in the anesthesia circuit and activated to provide -9 mmHg ETP. After the ITPR has been active for at least two minutes, the same hemodynamic and TEE data obtained above will be gathered. After the data is recorded, the ITPR will be disconnected and no further interventions will be made. In addition to the hemodynamic and echocardiographic data described above, an arterial blood gas will be obtained from the pre-existing radial artery catheter during the on- and off- states. Finally, the TEE examination will be recorded on videotape or DVD. A second echocardiographer, blinded to patient and ITPR status will review each echocardiogram and assess left ventricular performance. In addition to the data derived at the time of testing, the second echocardiographer will assess, if possible, changes in EF using Simpson's method of disks is used to calculate the LV volume. This is a proof of concept/feasibility study designed to test the primary hypothesis that use of the ITPR will result in increased systemic blood pressure and cardiac output in patients undergoing CABG surgery. The effect of the ITPR on other secondary indicators of cardiac performance will also be examined. These include but are not limited to left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV), ejection fraction (EF), left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV), and fractional area change (FAC) as assessed by echocardiography, pulmonary artery pressure, and calculated systemic vascular resistance (SVR).

Trial Health

80
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2 coronary-artery-disease

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2009

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2010

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 17, 2010

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 20, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

August 10, 2011

Status Verified

August 1, 2011

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

September 17, 2010

Last Update Submit

August 9, 2011

Conditions

Keywords

CABG surgery

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • hemodynamic variables

    hemodynamic variables (pulmonary and systemic blood pressure, central and pulmonary venous pressure, cardiac output, calculated SVR) will be collected at baseline \& 2 minutes post device activation

    baseline & 2 minutes post device activation

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • left ventricular performance

    baseline &2 minutes after activation of the device

Study Arms (1)

ITPR device

EXPERIMENTAL

the ITPR will be inserted in the anesthesia circuit and activated to provide -10 mmHg ETP.

Device: ITPR

Interventions

ITPRDEVICE

the ITPR will be inserted in the anesthesia circuit and activated to provide -10 mmHg ETP.

ITPR device

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \. patients presenting for elective CABG with planned intraoperative TEE 2. age 18 years of age and older 3. informed consent has been obtained

You may not qualify if:

  • \. Patients with planned valve surgery (valve or CABG + valve) 2. patients with a contraindication to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE); including patients with extensive esophageal or gastric disease. Relative contraindications include esophageal varices, Barrett's esophagus, Zenker's diverticulum, and postradiation therapy of the esophageal area.
  • \. patients requiring IABP or VAD pre-operatively 4. emergent CABG 5. pneumothorax 6. hemothorax 7. uncontrolled bleeding 8. uncontrolled hypertension defined as SBP \> 180 mmHg at the time of surgery

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Virginia Health System

Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908, United States

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Lurie KG, Zielinski TM, McKnite SH, Idris AH, Yannopoulos D, Raedler CM, Sigurdsson G, Benditt DG, Voelckel WG. Treatment of hypotension in pigs with an inspiratory impedance threshold device: a feasibility study. Crit Care Med. 2004 Jul;32(7):1555-62. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000131207.29081.a2.

    PMID: 15241102BACKGROUND
  • Lurie KG, Zielinski T, McKnite S, Aufderheide T, Voelckel W. Use of an inspiratory impedance valve improves neurologically intact survival in a porcine model of ventricular fibrillation. Circulation. 2002 Jan 1;105(1):124-9. doi: 10.1161/hc0102.101391.

    PMID: 11772887BACKGROUND
  • Lurie KG, Voelckel WG, Zielinski T, McKnite S, Lindstrom P, Peterson C, Wenzel V, Lindner KH, Samniah N, Benditt D. Improving standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation with an inspiratory impedance threshold valve in a porcine model of cardiac arrest. Anesth Analg. 2001 Sep;93(3):649-55. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200109000-00024.

    PMID: 11524335BACKGROUND
  • Lurie KG, Mulligan KA, McKnite S, Detloff B, Lindstrom P, Lindner KH. Optimizing standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation with an inspiratory impedance threshold valve. Chest. 1998 Apr;113(4):1084-90. doi: 10.1378/chest.113.4.1084.

    PMID: 9554651BACKGROUND
  • Yannopoulos D, McKnite S, Metzger A, Lurie KG. Intrathoracic pressure regulation improves 24-hour survival in a porcine model of hypovolemic shock. Anesth Analg. 2007 Jan;104(1):157-62. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000249047.80184.5a.

    PMID: 17179262BACKGROUND
  • Yannopoulos D, McKnite SH, Metzger A, Lurie KG. Intrathoracic pressure regulation for intracranial pressure management in normovolemic and hypovolemic pigs. Crit Care Med. 2006 Dec;34(12 Suppl):S495-500. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000246082.10422.7E.

    PMID: 17114984BACKGROUND
  • Yannopoulos D, Metzger A, McKnite S, Nadkarni V, Aufderheide TP, Idris A, Dries D, Benditt DG, Lurie KG. Intrathoracic pressure regulation improves vital organ perfusion pressures in normovolemic and hypovolemic pigs. Resuscitation. 2006 Sep;70(3):445-53. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.02.005. Epub 2006 Aug 9.

    PMID: 16901611BACKGROUND
  • Yannopoulos D, Nadkarni VM, McKnite SH, Rao A, Kruger K, Metzger A, Benditt DG, Lurie KG. Intrathoracic pressure regulator during continuous-chest-compression advanced cardiac resuscitation improves vital organ perfusion pressures in a porcine model of cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2005 Aug 9;112(6):803-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.541508. Epub 2005 Aug 1.

    PMID: 16061732BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Edward C Nemergut, MD

    University of Virginia Anesthesiology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 17, 2010

First Posted

September 20, 2010

Study Start

May 1, 2009

Primary Completion

May 1, 2010

Last Updated

August 10, 2011

Record last verified: 2011-08

Locations