Efficacy and Tolerability of Riluzole in Treatment Resistant Depression
2 other identifiers
interventional
104
1 country
3
Brief Summary
This study aims to examine the antidepressant efficacy of riluzole, employing a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, adjunctive trial in treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (TRD).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2 depression
Started Jun 2011
Typical duration for phase_2 depression
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 16, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 17, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 8, 2018
CompletedMarch 6, 2020
March 1, 2020
3.9 years
September 16, 2010
October 10, 2017
March 4, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
This 10 item instrument is completed by the clinician by using a structured interview and defined anchor points, and aims to quantify the degree of depression over the past 7 days. The MADRS is a widely studied instrument for depression, and its reliability and validity are high. This instrument is administered at every study visit during the double-blind RCT, and at the screening, and baseline. Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60. Usual cutoff points are: 0 to 6 - normal/symptom absent 7 to 19 - mild depression 20 to 34 - moderate depression \>34 - severe depression
4 weeks of therapy (baseline to week 4)
Change in Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
This 10 item instrument is completed by the clinician by using a structured interview and defined anchor points, and aims to quantify the degree of depression over the past 7 days. The MADRS is a widely studied instrument for depression, and its reliability and validity are high. This instrument is administered at every study visit during the double-blind RCT, and at the screening, and baseline. Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60. Usual cutoff points are: 0 to 6 - normal/symptom absent 7 to 19 - mild depression 20 to 34 - moderate depression \>34 - severe depression
4 weeks of therapy (week 4 to week 8)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Responders Having at Least a 50% Improvement in MADRS Compared to the Baseline
8 weeks therapy
Systematic Assessment for Treatment Emergent Events (SAFTEE-SI)
8 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Riluzole addition to SSRI antidepressant
EXPERIMENTALRiluzole 100mg added to ongoing SSRI or SNRI antidepressant for 8 weeks
Placebo addition to standard SSRI antidepressant
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo will be added to ongoing SSRI or SNRI antidepressant treatment for 8 weeks
Riluzole/Placebo addition to SSRI antidepressant
EXPERIMENTALRiluzole 100mg added to ongoing SSRI or SNRI antidepressant for 4 weeks and placebo will added to ongoing SSRI or SNRI antidepressant treatment for 4 weeks
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-65
- Written informed consent
- Meets DSM-IV criteria (by Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV - SCID-I/P) for MDD, current
- Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Rated (IDS-SR30) score of \> 20 at screening, baseline and start of double-blind phase (Phase 2)
- Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score of 18 or higher at baseline and start of Phase 2.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant women or women of child bearing potential who are not using a medically accepted means of contraception (to include oral contraceptive or implant, condom, diaphragm, spermicide, intrauterine device, tubal ligation, or partner with vasectomy)
- Patients who no longer meet DSM-IV criteria for MDD during the baseline visit
- Patients who demonstrate \> 50% decrease in depressive symptoms as reflected by the IDS-SR total score from screen to baseline
- Serious suicide or homicide risk, as assessed by evaluating clinician A serious suicide risk will be considered an inability to control suicide attempts, imminent risk of suicide in the investigator's judgment, or a history of serious suicidal behavior, which is defined using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) as either (1) one or more actual suicide attempts in the 3 years before study entry with the lethality rated at 3 or higher, or (2) one or more interrupted suicide attempts with a potential lethality judged to result in serious injury or death.
- Unstable medical illness including cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, respiratory, endocrine, neurological, or hematological disease
- The following DSM-IV diagnoses: substance use disorders active within the last six months, any bipolar disorder (current or past), any psychotic disorder (current or past)
- History of a seizure disorder or clinical evidence of untreated hypothyroidism
- Patients requiring excluded medications (see Table 3 for details)
- Psychotic features in the current episode or a history of psychotic features, as assessed by SCID
- Any investigational psychotropic drug within the last 3 months
- Have failed 3 or more adequate antidepressant trials during the current Major Depressive Episode by MGH-ATRQ criteria.
- Patients with a history of antidepressant-induced hypomania.
- Patients with any evidence of clinically significant liver abnormalities, or any liver transaminase level \>1.5 X ULN at initial screening, or \>5 x ULN during Phase 2 treatment.
- Axis II personality disorders that are the primary purpose of treatment, or would interfere with a patient's safety or compliance.
- Patients currently being treated for a respiratory disorder (including asthma or COPD)
- +22 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Yale Universitylead
Study Sites (3)
Yale University, Yale Depression Research Program
New Haven, Connecticut, 06511, United States
Massachussettes General Hospital, Depression Clinical and Research Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Related Publications (5)
Sanacora G, Kendell SF, Levin Y, Simen AA, Fenton LR, Coric V, Krystal JH. Preliminary evidence of riluzole efficacy in antidepressant-treated patients with residual depressive symptoms. Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Mar 15;61(6):822-5. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.08.037. Epub 2006 Dec 4.
PMID: 17141740BACKGROUNDZarate CA Jr, Payne JL, Quiroz J, Sporn J, Denicoff KK, Luckenbaugh D, Charney DS, Manji HK. An open-label trial of riluzole in patients with treatment-resistant major depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Jan;161(1):171-4. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.1.171.
PMID: 14702270BACKGROUNDKheirkhah M, Hejazi NS, Nugent AC, Gilbert JR, Leistritz L, Walter M, Duncan WC Jr, Goldman D, Zarate CA Jr. Exploring the link between waking gamma and sleep delta power in healthy volunteers and individuals with treatment-resistant depression. J Affect Disord. 2025 Sep 15;385:119448. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.119448. Epub 2025 May 19.
PMID: 40398609DERIVEDKheirkhah M, Duncan WC Jr, Yuan Q, Wang PR, Jamalabadi H, Leistritz L, Walter M, Goldman D, Zarate CA Jr, Hejazi NS. REM density predicts rapid antidepressant response to ketamine in individuals with treatment-resistant depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2025 May;50(6):941-946. doi: 10.1038/s41386-025-02066-7. Epub 2025 Feb 15.
PMID: 39955416DERIVEDHejazi NS, Farmer CA, Oppenheimer M, Falodun TB, Park LT, Duncan WC Jr, Zarate CA Jr. The relationship between the HDRS insomnia items and polysomnographic (PSG) measures in individuals with treatment-resistant depression. J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Apr;148:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.01.022. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
PMID: 35092868DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Gerard Sanacora, PhD, MD: Professor of Psychiatry; Director, Yale Depression Research Program
- Organization
- Yale University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gerard Sanacora, MD PhD
Yale University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maurizio Fava, MD
Massachusettes General Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sanjay Matthew, MD
Baylor College of Medicine
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Carlos Zarate, MD
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 16, 2010
First Posted
September 17, 2010
Study Start
June 1, 2011
Primary Completion
May 1, 2015
Study Completion
August 1, 2015
Last Updated
March 6, 2020
Results First Posted
February 8, 2018
Record last verified: 2020-03