Comparing Outcomes of Elbow Extension Tendon Transfers
A Comparison of Two Surgical Procedures That Restore Elbow Extension
1 other identifier
observational
14
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Active elbow extension has significant functional benefits for individuals with tetraplegia. The proposed work will provide information to assess how effectively people are using their elbow extension tendon transfers, and whether one surgery works more effectively than the other. This study will provide recommendations to clinicians about the possibility of improving function after surgery using rehab techniques.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Aug 2011
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 15, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 17, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 7, 2016
CompletedMarch 8, 2016
February 1, 2016
3.3 years
September 15, 2010
December 2, 2015
February 8, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Elbow Extension Strength
Elbow extension strength was measured as the maximum elbow extension moment that subject's could generate. We used an elbow moment transducer to measure elbow moments under isometric (no change in arm posture) conditions. Subjects performed three trials at maximum effort, holding maximum elbow extension for 5 to 7 seconds. The maximum moment was computed as the maximum average moment sustained over a 0.5 second window.
At least one year post surgery
Study Arms (4)
Group 1
Subjects with posterior deltoid-to-triceps tendon transfers
Group 2
Subjects with biceps-to-triceps tendon transfers
Group 3
Subjects with cervical SCI who have not had tendon transfers
Group 4
Unimpaired control subjects
Eligibility Criteria
Three groups of subjects will be recruited to participate in the experiments: individuals that have had the posterior deltoid to triceps tendon transfer, individuals that have the biceps to triceps tendon transfer, and individuals with SCI between C5-C7 who have not had tendon transfers. Nominally, we plan to recruit 15 subjects from each group.
You may qualify if:
- Cervical Spinal Cord Injury (C5-C7)
- Posterior Deltoid to Triceps Tendon Transfer at least one year post-surgery
- Biceps to Triceps Tendon Transfer at least one year post-surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects will be excluded from the studies if there is presence of concurrent severe medical illness, including:
- unhealed decubiti
- use of baclofen pumps
- existing infection
- cardiovascular disease
- significant osteoporosis (as indicated by a history of fractures following injury)
- or a history of pulmonary complications or autonomic dysreflexia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- VA Office of Research and Developmentlead
- Shirley Ryan AbilityLabcollaborator
- Northwestern Universitycollaborator
- Case Western Reserve Universitycollaborator
- Loyola Universitycollaborator
- MetroHealth System, Ohiocollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL
Hines, Illinois, 60141-5000, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Wendy Murray
- Organization
- Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wendy M Murray, PhD
Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 15, 2010
First Posted
September 17, 2010
Study Start
August 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
March 8, 2016
Results First Posted
January 7, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-02