Loading search results
TOACT
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
67
6 countries
15
Study Start
September 2011
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Primary Completion
December 2016
Actual (reported)Study Completion
October 2017
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Background: Endovascular thrombolysis, with or without mechanical clot removal (ET), may be beneficial for a subgroup of patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVT), who have a poor prognosis despite treatment with heparin. Published experience with ET is promising, but only based on case series and not on controlled trials. Objective: The main objective of the TO-ACT trial is to determine if ET improves the functional outcome of patients with a severe form of CVT Study design: The TO-ACT trial will be designed as a multi-centre, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) trial. Study population: Patients are eligible if they have a radiologically proven CVT, a high probability of poor outcome (defined by presence of one or more of the following risk factors: mental status disorder, coma, intracranial hemorrhagic lesion or thrombosis of the deep cerebral venous system) and the responsible physician is uncertain if ET or standard anti-coagulant treatment is better. Intervention: Patients will be randomized to receive either ET or standard therapy (therapeutic doses of heparin). ET consists of local application of alteplase or urokinase within the thrombosed sinuses, and/or mechanical thrombectomy. Glasgow coma score, NIH stroke scale and relevant laboratory parameters will be assessed at baseline. Endpoints: The primary endpoint is the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 12 months. The most important secondary outcomes are the mRS, mortality and recanalization rate at 6 months. Major intra- and extracranial hemorrhagic complications within one week following the intervention are the principal safety outcome. Results will be analyzed according to the "intention-to-treat" principle. Assessment of study endpoints will be carried out according to standardized questionnaires by a blinded neurologist or research nurse who is not involved in the treatment of the patient. Study size: To detect a 50% relative reduction in mRS≥2 (from 40 to 20%), 164 patients (82 in each treatment arm) have to be included (two-sided alpha, 80% power). Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Included patients may benefit directly from ET. Complications of ET, most notably intracranial hemorrhages, constitute the most important risk of the study.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
October 2017
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
September 15, 2010
Actual (reported)September 17, 2010
Actual (reported)September 2011
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
December 2016
Actual (reported)October 2017
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Favorable clinical outcome (modified Rankin score 0-1)
Outcome on the modified Rankin Scale (mortality included) at 12 months after randomization is considered the primary study outcome to determine the efficacy of thrombolytic treatment. For the primary endpoint the mRS will be dichotomized between 1 and 2 (i.e. incomplete recovery is defined as a score of 2 or higher, including death).
12 months after randomization
Favorable clinical outcome (modified Rankin score 0-1)
6 months after randomization
Recanalization rate of cerebral venous system
6 months
All cause mortality
6 months
Required surgical intervention in relation to CVT
6 months
Major extracranial and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhagic complications
1 week after randomization
Interim analyses: Favorable clinical outcome (modified Rankin score 0-1)
After inclusion of 1/3rd and 2/3rd of patients
Endovascular thrombolysis consists of local application of alteplase or urokinase within the thrombosed sinuses. Standard endovascular techniques to mechanically remove clot material, such as thrombosuction, are allowed, but not mandatory.
The patients randomized to standard care will receive (or continue) either intravenous adjusted dose unfractionated heparin (aPTT value kept within 1.5 to 2.5 times the normal value), or any type of body-weight adjusted low molecular weight heparin in therapeutic dose, according to local custom and international guidelines
Centre hospitalier de l'université de Montréal (CHUM)
Montreal, Canada
XuanWu Hospital
Beijing, China
Hôpital Lariboisière
Paris, France
Academic Medical Centre
Amsterdam, Netherlands
University Medical Centre Groningen
Groningen, Netherlands
St. Antonius hospital
Nieuwegein, Netherlands
Erasmus Medical Centre
Rotterdam, Netherlands
Coutinho JM, Stam J. How to treat cerebral venous and sinus thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost. 2010 May;8(5):877-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03799.x. Epub 2010 Feb 9.
Canhao P, Falcao F, Ferro JM. Thrombolytics for cerebral sinus thrombosis: a systematic review. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;15(3):159-66. doi: 10.1159/000068833.
Ciccone A, Canhao P, Falcao F, Ferro JM, Sterzi R. Thrombolysis for cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2004(1):CD003693. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003693.pub2.
Jan Stam, MD, PhD
University of Amsterdam
Jose M Ferro, MD, PhD
Hospital Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal
Marie-Germaine Bousser, MD, PhD
Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France
Patricia Canhão, MD, PhD
Hospital Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal
67 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
September 15, 2010
First Posted
September 17, 2010
Study Start
September 2011
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Haga hospital
The Hague, Netherlands
Medical Centre Haaglanden
The Hague, Netherlands
Hospital de Braga
Braga, Portugal
Hospital da Universidade de Coimbra
Coimbra, Portugal
Hospital Santa Maria
Lisbon, Portugal
Hospital Sao Jose hospital
Lisbon, Portugal
Hospital de Santo António
Porto, Portugal
Inselspital, University Hospital
Bern, Switzerland
Stam J, Majoie CB, van Delden OM, van Lienden KP, Reekers JA. Endovascular thrombectomy and thrombolysis for severe cerebral sinus thrombosis: a prospective study. Stroke. 2008 May;39(5):1487-90. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.502658. Epub 2008 Mar 13.
Coutinho JM, Zuurbier SM, Bousser MG, Ji X, Canhao P, Roos YB, Crassard I, Nunes AP, Uyttenboogaart M, Chen J, Emmer BJ, Roosendaal SD, Houdart E, Reekers JA, van den Berg R, de Haan RJ, Majoie CB, Ferro JM, Stam J; TO-ACT investigators. Effect of Endovascular Treatment With Medical Management vs Standard Care on Severe Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: The TO-ACT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2020 Aug 1;77(8):966-973. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1022.
Coutinho JM, Ferro JM, Zuurbier SM, Mink MS, Canhao P, Crassard I, Majoie CB, Reekers JA, Houdart E, de Haan RJ, Bousser MG, Stam J. Thrombolysis or anticoagulation for cerebral venous thrombosis: rationale and design of the TO-ACT trial. Int J Stroke. 2013 Feb;8(2):135-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2011.00753.x. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
Isabelle Crassard, MD, PhD
Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France
Charles BL Majoie, MD, PhD
University of Amsterdam
Jim A Reekers, MD, PhD
University of Amsterdam
E Houdart, MD, PhD
Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France
Rob J de Haan, PhD
University of Amsterdam
Primary Completion
December 2016
Actual (reported)Study Completion
October 2017
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Last Updated
February 14, 2017
Record last verified: 2016-11
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: