An Open-Label Long-Term Study Of Pregabalin For The Treatment Of Central Neuropathic Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
104
1 country
26
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety of the long-term use of pregabalin at doses up to 600 mg/day in patients with central neuropathic pain (post spinal cord injury pain, post stroke pain, and multiple sclerosis pain).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Sep 2010
26 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 31, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 15, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 17, 2013
CompletedJanuary 28, 2021
April 1, 2013
1.5 years
August 31, 2010
January 10, 2013
January 26, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (12)
Number of Participants With Peripheral Edema
Number of participants who had peripheral edema in lower extremities. Edema was categorized as follows: trace, pitting 1 (lower leg), 2 (lower leg to knee), and 3 (above knee and /or presacral edema).
Baseline, Weeks 4, 20, 36, 52, and 53
Number of Participants With Facial/Periorbital Edema
Number of participants who had facial or periorbital edema.
Baseline, Weeks 4, 20, 36, 52, and 53
Number of Participants With Generalized or Abdominal Edema
Number of participants who had generalized or abdominal edema.
Baseline, Weeks 4, 20, 36, 52, and 53
Number of Participants With Localized Pain Related to Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)
DVT was defined if a segment of the deep vein of the lower limb was not compressible or a previous compressive vein became non compressive or there was no flow in the underlying vessel. Symptoms of DVT included pain in the lower limb, localized tenderness, swelling, pitting edema, collateral superficial veins (non-varicose), and skin redness. The symptom was assessed as mild, moderate or severe.
Baseline, Weeks 4, 20, 36, 52, and 53
Number of Participants With Localized Tenderness Related to Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)
DVT was defined if a segment of the deep vein of the lower limb was not compressible or a previous compressive vein became non compressive or there was no flow in the underlying vessel. Symptoms of DVT included pain in the lower limb, localized tenderness, swelling, pitting edema, collateral superficial veins (non-varicose), and skin redness. The symptom was assessed as mild, moderate or severe.
Baseline, Weeks 4, 20, 36, 52, and 53
Number of Participants With Swelling Related to Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)
DVT was defined if a segment of the deep vein of the lower limb was not compressible or a previous compressive vein became non compressive or there was no flow in the underlying vessel. Symptoms of DVT included pain in the lower limb, localized tenderness, swelling, pitting edema, collateral superficial veins (non-varicose), and skin redness. The symptom was assessed as mild, moderate or severe.
Baseline, Weeks 4, 20, 36, 52, and 53
Number of Participants With Pitting Edema Related to Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)
DVT was defined if a segment of the deep vein of the lower limb was not compressible or a previous compressive vein became non compressive or there was no flow in the underlying vessel. Symptoms of DVT included pain in the lower limb, localized tenderness, swelling, pitting edema, collateral superficial veins (non-varicose), and skin redness. The symptom was assessed as mild, moderate or severe.
Baseline, Weeks 4, 20, 36, 52, and 53
Number of Participants With Collateral Superficial Veins (Non-varicose) Related to Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)
DVT was defined if a segment of the deep vein of the lower limb was not compressible or a previous compressive vein became non compressive or there was no flow in the underlying vessel. Symptoms of DVT included pain in the lower limb, localized tenderness, swelling, pitting edema, collateral superficial veins (non-varicose), and skin redness. The symptom was assessed as mild, moderate or severe.
Baseline, Weeks 4, 20, 36, 52, and 53
Number of Participants With Skin Redness Related to Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)
DVT was defined if a segment of the deep vein of the lower limb was not compressible or a previous compressive vein became non compressive or there was no flow in the underlying vessel. Symptoms of DVT included pain in the lower limb, localized tenderness, swelling, pitting edema, collateral superficial veins (non-varicose), and skin redness. The symptom was assessed as mild, moderate or severe.
Baseline, Weeks 4, 20, 36, 52, and 53
Number of Participants With Visual Field Deteriorated
Number of participants who had normal visual field at baseline and showed abnormal result after the study treatment, assessed by confrontational visual field test (neurological examination).
53 weeks
Number of Participants With Deterioration in Neurological Examination Findings
Worsening of the condition relative to baseline was reported as deteriorated. Assessment categories are as follows: normal or abnormal for Cranial Nerve Function, Mental State, and Coordination; normal, mild, moderate, or severe ataxia for Gait; none/absent, normal, or hyper-reflexic for Deep Tendon Reflexes; absent or present for Abnormal Reflexes; normal, mild, moderate, or severe weakness for Muscle Strength; slight, more marked, or considerable increase, or affected parts rigid in flexion or extension for Muscle Tone; absent or present for Sensory Function.
53 weeks
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation According to Sheehan Suicidality Tracking Scale (Sheehan-STS)
The Sheehan-STS is an 8-item prospective rating scale that tracks treatment-emergent suicidal ideation and behaviors. Participants who reported a score of ≥1 (5-point scale ranging from 0: not at all to 4: extremely) for Item 2, 3, 4 or 5 of the Sheehan-STS prognostic scale is considered to have suicidal ideation as the scores are mapped to Category 4 (suicide ideation) of the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment.
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 20, 28, 36, 44, and 52
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change From Baseline in Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) at Each Time Point: Total Scores
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 20, 28, 36, 44, and 52
Change From Baseline in Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) at Each Time Point: Sensory Scores
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 20, 28, 36, 44, and 52
Change From Baseline in Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) at Each Time Point: Affective Scores
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 20, 28, 36, 44, and 52
Change From Baseline in the Modified Brief Pain Inventory (10 Item) (mBPI-10)Total Scores at Last Evaluation Score
Baseline, Week 52
Study Arms (1)
Pregabalin
EXPERIMENTALFlexible dosing in 4 weeks followed by 48 weeks maintenance and one week taper period
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects who completed the 18-week study period in Study A0081107 conducted for chronic neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury;
- Subjects who completed assessments of all efficacy endpoints until the end of the treatment phase of the preceding Study A0081107 (V7);
- Subjects with central neuropathic pain after stroke or multiple sclerosis;
- At least 6 months have passed after the onset of central neuropathic pain;
- Pain VAS at least 40mm in Visit 1 and Visit 2;
You may not qualify if:
- Creatinine clearance \< 60 mL/min;
- Platelet count \< 100 × 103/mm3 ; White blood cell (WBC) count \< 2500 / mm3; Neutrophil count \< 1500/ mm3;
- Subjects who are expected to require surgery during the trial;
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (26)
Chubu Rosai Hospital
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan
Kimura Clinic
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan
Nagoya Kyoritsu Clinic
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan
Senboku Kumiai General Hospital
Daisen, Akita, Japan
Go neurosurgical clinic
Chikushi-gun, Fukuoka, Japan
Spinal Injuries Center
Iizuka, Fukuoka, Japan
Brain Attack Center Ota Memorial Hospital
Fukuyama, Hiroshima, Japan
Hokkaido Chuo Rosai Hospital Sekison Center
Bibai, Hokkaido, Japan
Hakodate Central General Hospital
Hakodate, Hokkaido, Japan
Kobe Tokushukai Hospital
Kobe, Hyōgo, Japan
Aida Kinen Rehabilitation Hospital
Moriya, Ibaraki, Japan
General Hanamaki Hospital
Hanamaki, Iwate, Japan
Uchida Rehabilitation Orthopedic Clinic
Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
Kumamoto Rehabilitation Hospital
Kikuchi-gun, Kumamoto, Japan
Kohnan Hospital
Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
Sendai Pain Clinic
Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
National Hospital Organization Niigata National Hospital
Kashiwazaki, Niigata, Japan
Nakamura Hospital
Beppu, Oita Prefecture, Japan
Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Medical Center Hospital
Kitamoto, Saitama, Japan
Kamitsuga General Hospital
Kanuma, Tochigi, Japan
Juntendo University Hospital
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Jukoukai hospital
Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan
National Hospital Organization, Murayama Medical Center
Musashimurayama-shi, Tokyo, Japan
Okitama Public General Hospital
Higashiokitama-gun, Yamagata, Japan
Tokushima University Hospital
Tokushima, Japan
National Hospital Organization Yamagata Hospital
Yamagata, Japan
Related Publications (1)
Onouchi K, Koga H, Yokoyama K, Yoshiyama T. An open-label, long-term study examining the safety and tolerability of pregabalin in Japanese patients with central neuropathic pain. J Pain Res. 2014 Jul 28;7:439-47. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S63028. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 25114584DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
- Organization
- Pfizer, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Pfizer
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 31, 2010
First Posted
September 15, 2010
Study Start
September 1, 2010
Primary Completion
March 1, 2012
Study Completion
March 1, 2012
Last Updated
January 28, 2021
Results First Posted
May 17, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-04