NCT01199757

Brief Summary

Previous publications have indicated that Allergic Rhinitis (AR) patients suffering from both ocular and nasal symptoms have a greater burden of illness and lower quality of life than patients suffering from nasal symptoms alone. Fluticasone furoate (FF) acts against both nasal and ocular symptoms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences in symptom control (both perceptually and objectively) and resource use for patients with current seasonal AR.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
540

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2009

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 10, 2009

Completed
22 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2009

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2009

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 9, 2010

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 13, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

August 14, 2017

Status Verified

August 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

22 days

First QC Date

September 9, 2010

Last Update Submit

August 11, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

ocular symptomsnasal symptomsAllergic RhinitisSymptom Free DaysQuality of Life

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Evaluate the differences in Symtom Free Days (SFD) in patients receiving FF, MF or FP

    4 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Evaluate the differences in Quality of Life (mini-Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire) in patients receiving FF, MF or FP

    4 weeks

  • Evaluate the differences in the number of AR treatments used by patients receiving FF, MF or FP

    4 weeks

  • Evaluate the differences in the number of non-prescribed treatments used by patients receiving FF, MF or FP

    4 weeks

  • Evaluate the differences in the cost of non-prescribed treatments used by patients receiving FF, MF or FP

    4 weeks

  • Evaluate the differences in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index in patients receiving FF, MF or FP

    4 weeks

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

FF

Cohort of patients receiving fluticasome furoate

Drug: Fluticasone furoate

MF

cohort of patients on mometasone furoate

Drug: mometasone furoate

FP

cohort of patients receiving fluticasone propionate

Drug: fluticasone propionate

Interventions

cohort of patients receiving fluticasone furate

Also known as: AVAMYS™
FF

cohort receiving mometasone furoate

Also known as: NASONEX™
MF

cohort of patients on fluticasone propionate

Also known as: FLIXONASE™
FP

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Inclusion criteria for physicians: * Qualified after 1965 * See 3 or more AR patients per week * Personally responsible for treatment decisions for patients with AR * Gave consent to participate to complete all tasks for the study duration 90 Primary Care Physicians and 45 allergists, each prospectively recruit 4 consecutive patients with SAR who provided consent to participate, for a total of 540 patients. Each physician completed a patient record form for 2 patients on fluticasone furate, 1 patient on mometasone furate and 1 patient on fluticasone propionate.

You may qualify if:

  • Current Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis sufferer (based on physician judgement)
  • Currently receiving prescribed INS treatment (no other treatment restrictions apply)
  • Have consumed at least one full prescription on the specified INS treatment
  • No comorbid Asthma or COPD diagnosis
  • Informed Consent

You may not qualify if:

  • None specified

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (3)

  • Higgins V, Kay S, Small M. Physician and patient survey of allergic rhinitis: methodology. Allergy. 2007;62 Suppl 85:6-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01547.x.

    PMID: 17927672BACKGROUND
  • Gueron B; Demoly P; Piercy J; Small M. A comparison of patients on Avamys vs Nasonex and Flixonase for Quality of Life and Symptoms Free Days in 3 European countries [Poster 380]. Presented at: XXIXth Congress of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, June 2010, London

    RESULT
  • Small M, Piercy J, Demoly P, Marsden H. Burden of illness and quality of life in patients being treated for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a cohort survey. Clin Transl Allergy. 2013 Oct 9;3(1):33. doi: 10.1186/2045-7022-3-33.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rhinitis, Allergic, PerennialRhinitis, Allergic

Interventions

fluticasone furoateMometasone FuroateFluticasone

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RhinitisNose DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesRespiratory HypersensitivityOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesHypersensitivity, ImmediateHypersensitivityImmune System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PregnadienediolsPregnadienesPregnanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic CompoundsAndrostadienesAndrostenesAndrostanes

Study Officials

  • GSK Clinical Trials

    GlaxoSmithKline

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 9, 2010

First Posted

September 13, 2010

Study Start

July 10, 2009

Primary Completion

August 1, 2009

Study Completion

August 1, 2009

Last Updated

August 14, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-08